CKX Lands Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CKX Lands Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. CKX Lands Inc (CKX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.86x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $242.27K could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($281.10K) in one year. Check CKX cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of CKX Lands Inc (1995–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of CKX Lands Inc from 1995 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for CKX Lands Inc across 30 annual periods. Check CKX Lands Inc (CKX) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CKX Lands Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2024)
CKX Lands Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CKX Lands Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does CKX Lands Inc generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.78x | $204.76K | $264.18K | ▼ -56.2% |
| 2023 | 1.77x | $876.95K | $495.35K | ▲ +14.3% |
| 2022 | 1.55x | $413.69K | $267.18K | ▲ +363.6% |
| 2021 | -0.59x | $-263.67K | $448.90K | ▼ -322.0% |
| 2020 | 0.26x | $140.16K | $529.86K | ▼ -43.6% |
| 2019 | 0.47x | $194.71K | $415.07K | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2018 | 0.60x | $241.56K | $404.48K | ▼ -39.7% |
| 2017 | 0.99x | $404.25K | $408.18K | ▲ +52.1% |
| 2016 | 0.65x | $280.81K | $431.38K | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2015 | 1.27x | $441.97K | $347.17K | ▼ -74.8% |
| 2014 | 5.04x | $1.44 Million | $285.66K | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2013 | 4.57x | $1.18 Million | $258.01K | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2012 | 8.92x | $1.99 Million | $222.69K | ▲ +194.5% |
| 2011 | 3.03x | $1.01 Million | $333.05K | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2010 | 3.22x | $774.57K | $240.81K | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2009 | 3.98x | $971.19K | $244.32K | ▼ -28.2% |
| 2008 | 5.54x | $1.43 Million | $258.12K | ▲ +457.4% |
| 2007 | 0.99x | $1.82 Million | $1.83 Million | ▲ +41.8% |
| 2006 | 0.70x | $1.69 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -81.8% |
| 2005 | 3.85x | $1.52 Million | $395.02K | ▼ -43.6% |
| 2004 | 6.83x | $1.47 Million | $215.27K | ▲ +19.1% |
| 2003 | 5.73x | $1.16 Million | $202.00K | ▲ +57.3% |
| 2002 | 3.64x | $830.91K | $227.97K | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2001 | 3.45x | $788.87K | $228.60K | ▼ -47.4% |
| 2000 | 6.56x | $1.58 Million | $241.20K | ▲ +18.2% |
| 1999 | 5.55x | $1.56 Million | $281.54K | ▲ +4165.6% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | $157.15K | $1.21 Million | ▼ -58.3% |
| 1997 | 0.31x | $287.01K | $920.15K | ▼ -37.9% |
| 1996 | 0.50x | $170.45K | $339.47K | ▼ -70.3% |
| 1995 | 1.69x | $681.83K | $403.50K | — |