CKX Lands Inc (CKX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
CKX Lands Inc (CKX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.86x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $242.27K could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($281.10K) in one year. See CKX Lands Inc free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
CKX Lands Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for CKX Lands Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore CKX Lands Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for CKX Lands Inc (1995–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for CKX Lands Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see CKX stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.78x | $204.76K | $264.18K | ▼ -56.2% |
| 2023 | 1.77x | $876.95K | $495.35K | ▲ +14.3% |
| 2022 | 1.55x | $413.69K | $267.18K | ▲ +363.6% |
| 2021 | -0.59x | $-263.67K | $448.90K | ▼ -322.0% |
| 2020 | 0.26x | $140.16K | $529.86K | ▼ -43.6% |
| 2019 | 0.47x | $194.71K | $415.07K | ▼ -21.5% |
| 2018 | 0.60x | $241.56K | $404.48K | ▼ -39.7% |
| 2017 | 0.99x | $404.25K | $408.18K | ▲ +52.1% |
| 2016 | 0.65x | $280.81K | $431.38K | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2015 | 1.27x | $441.97K | $347.17K | ▼ -74.8% |
| 2014 | 5.04x | $1.44 Million | $285.66K | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2013 | 4.57x | $1.18 Million | $258.01K | ▼ -48.8% |
| 2012 | 8.92x | $1.99 Million | $222.69K | ▲ +194.5% |
| 2011 | 3.03x | $1.01 Million | $333.05K | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2010 | 3.22x | $774.57K | $240.81K | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2009 | 3.98x | $971.19K | $244.32K | ▼ -28.2% |
| 2008 | 5.54x | $1.43 Million | $258.12K | ▲ +457.4% |
| 2007 | 0.99x | $1.82 Million | $1.83 Million | ▲ +41.8% |
| 2006 | 0.70x | $1.69 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -81.8% |
| 2005 | 3.85x | $1.52 Million | $395.02K | ▼ -43.6% |
| 2004 | 6.83x | $1.47 Million | $215.27K | ▲ +19.1% |
| 2003 | 5.73x | $1.16 Million | $202.00K | ▲ +57.3% |
| 2002 | 3.64x | $830.91K | $227.97K | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2001 | 3.45x | $788.87K | $228.60K | ▼ -47.4% |
| 2000 | 6.56x | $1.58 Million | $241.20K | ▲ +18.2% |
| 1999 | 5.55x | $1.56 Million | $281.54K | ▲ +4165.6% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | $157.15K | $1.21 Million | ▼ -58.3% |
| 1997 | 0.31x | $287.01K | $920.15K | ▼ -37.9% |
| 1996 | 0.50x | $170.45K | $339.47K | ▼ -70.3% |
| 1995 | 1.69x | $681.83K | $403.50K | — |