CKX Lands Inc (CKX) — Net Asset Quality Index
CKX Lands Inc (CKX) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 98.5% as of September 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of $19.16 Million minus total liabilities of $281.10K yields net assets of $18.88 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check CKX Lands Inc (CKX) asset resilience to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
CKX Lands Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1995–2024)
This chart shows how CKX Lands Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 30 annual periods from 1995 to 2024. As of September 2025, the index stands at 98.5%, representing net assets of $18.88 Million against total assets of $19.16 Million USD. See CKX current assets to equity ratio to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for CKX Lands Inc (1995–2024)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for CKX Lands Inc from 1995 to 2024, covering 30 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see CKX market cap overview.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (USD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 98.6% | $18.58 Million | $18.85 Million | $264.18K | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 2023 | 97.4% | $18.32 Million | $18.81 Million | $495.35K | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2022 | 98.5% | $17.42 Million | $17.69 Million | $267.18K | ▲ +1.1 pp |
| 2021 | 97.4% | $16.61 Million | $17.06 Million | $448.90K | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2020 | 96.8% | $15.79 Million | $16.32 Million | $529.86K | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 2019 | 97.4% | $15.45 Million | $15.86 Million | $415.07K | ▼ 0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 97.4% | $15.20 Million | $15.60 Million | $404.48K | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2017 | 97.2% | $14.32 Million | $14.72 Million | $408.18K | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2016 | 97.0% | $13.99 Million | $14.42 Million | $431.38K | ▼ -0.5 pp |
| 2015 | 97.5% | $13.81 Million | $14.16 Million | $347.17K | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 2014 | 97.9% | $13.54 Million | $13.83 Million | $285.66K | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2013 | 98.0% | $12.79 Million | $13.05 Million | $258.01K | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2012 | 98.2% | $12.36 Million | $12.59 Million | $222.69K | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2011 | 97.0% | $10.66 Million | $10.99 Million | $333.05K | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 2010 | 97.7% | $10.25 Million | $10.49 Million | $240.81K | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2009 | 97.6% | $9.90 Million | $10.15 Million | $244.32K | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2008 | 97.4% | $9.56 Million | $9.82 Million | $258.12K | ▲ +14.0 pp |
| 2007 | 83.4% | $9.19 Million | $11.03 Million | $1.83 Million | ▲ +7.1 pp |
| 2006 | 76.3% | $7.72 Million | $10.13 Million | $2.40 Million | ▼ -19.4 pp |
| 2005 | 95.7% | $8.77 Million | $9.17 Million | $395.02K | ▼ -1.7 pp |
| 2004 | 97.4% | $7.97 Million | $8.18 Million | $215.27K | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2003 | 97.2% | $6.92 Million | $7.12 Million | $202.00K | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2002 | 96.6% | $6.42 Million | $6.65 Million | $227.97K | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2001 | 96.4% | $6.18 Million | $6.41 Million | $228.60K | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2000 | 96.0% | $5.79 Million | $6.04 Million | $241.20K | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 1999 | 94.6% | $4.93 Million | $5.21 Million | $281.54K | ▲ +20.0 pp |
| 1998 | 74.6% | $3.55 Million | $4.76 Million | $1.21 Million | ▼ -4.0 pp |
| 1997 | 78.6% | $3.39 Million | $4.31 Million | $920.15K | ▼ -11.5 pp |
| 1996 | 90.1% | $3.11 Million | $3.45 Million | $339.47K | ▲ +3.5 pp |
| 1995 | 86.6% | $2.62 Million | $3.02 Million | $403.50K | — |