United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.48x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.86 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.13 Million) in one year. See United States Antimony Corporation free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
United States Antimony Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for United States Antimony Corporation across 29 annual periods. Also explore United States Antimony Corporation net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for United States Antimony Corporation (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for United States Antimony Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see UAMY market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.37x | $2.22 Million | $6.04 Million | ▲ +119.9% |
| 2023 | -1.85x | $-4.75 Million | $2.57 Million | ▼ -1995.9% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-249.28K | $2.83 Million | ▲ +90.5% |
| 2021 | -0.92x | $-2.43 Million | $2.63 Million | ▼ -332.2% |
| 2020 | -0.21x | $-1.31 Million | $6.11 Million | ▼ -9731.5% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | $-11.36K | $5.23 Million | ▲ +98.0% |
| 2018 | -0.11x | $-656.63K | $6.13 Million | ▼ -200.9% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $716.71K | $6.75 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $425.84K | $6.42 Million | ▲ +7.3% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $358.45K | $5.80 Million | ▲ +121.2% |
| 2014 | -0.29x | $-1.04 Million | $3.55 Million | ▼ -583.6% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $234.82K | $3.89 Million | ▼ -64.5% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $526.42K | $3.10 Million | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | $564.04K | $2.23 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2010 | 0.32x | $307.35K | $974.23K | ▲ +192.9% |
| 2009 | -0.34x | $-358.19K | $1.05 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2008 | -0.25x | $-378.58K | $1.49 Million | ▼ -91.8% |
| 2007 | -0.13x | $-347.30K | $2.62 Million | ▼ -319.0% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $137.46K | $2.27 Million | ▲ +146.8% |
| 2005 | -0.13x | $-302.53K | $2.34 Million | ▲ +35.3% |
| 2004 | -0.20x | $-426.04K | $2.13 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2003 | -0.17x | $-449.46K | $2.70 Million | ▼ -768.2% |
| 2002 | -0.02x | $-44.49K | $2.32 Million | ▲ +85.5% |
| 2001 | -0.13x | $-251.41K | $1.89 Million | ▲ +56.3% |
| 2000 | -0.30x | $-791.09K | $2.60 Million | ▼ -1697.4% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $59.99K | $3.15 Million | ▲ +332.2% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | $16.60K | $3.77 Million | ▼ -60.5% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $40.41K | $3.63 Million | ▲ +127.1% |
| 1996 | -0.04x | $-211.49K | $5.14 Million | — |