United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.48x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.86 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.13 Million) in one year. Explore United States Antimony Corporation long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
United States Antimony Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for United States Antimony Corporation across 29 annual periods. Also explore total assets of United States Antimony Corporation for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for United States Antimony Corporation (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for United States Antimony Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see UAMY company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.37x | $2.22 Million | $6.04 Million | ▲ +119.9% |
| 2023 | -1.85x | $-4.75 Million | $2.57 Million | ▼ -1995.9% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-249.28K | $2.83 Million | ▲ +90.5% |
| 2021 | -0.92x | $-2.43 Million | $2.63 Million | ▼ -332.2% |
| 2020 | -0.21x | $-1.31 Million | $6.11 Million | ▼ -9731.5% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | $-11.36K | $5.23 Million | ▲ +98.0% |
| 2018 | -0.11x | $-656.63K | $6.13 Million | ▼ -200.9% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $716.71K | $6.75 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $425.84K | $6.42 Million | ▲ +7.3% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $358.45K | $5.80 Million | ▲ +121.2% |
| 2014 | -0.29x | $-1.04 Million | $3.55 Million | ▼ -583.6% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $234.82K | $3.89 Million | ▼ -64.5% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $526.42K | $3.10 Million | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | $564.04K | $2.23 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2010 | 0.32x | $307.35K | $974.23K | ▲ +192.9% |
| 2009 | -0.34x | $-358.19K | $1.05 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2008 | -0.25x | $-378.58K | $1.49 Million | ▼ -91.8% |
| 2007 | -0.13x | $-347.30K | $2.62 Million | ▼ -319.0% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $137.46K | $2.27 Million | ▲ +146.8% |
| 2005 | -0.13x | $-302.53K | $2.34 Million | ▲ +35.3% |
| 2004 | -0.20x | $-426.04K | $2.13 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2003 | -0.17x | $-449.46K | $2.70 Million | ▼ -768.2% |
| 2002 | -0.02x | $-44.49K | $2.32 Million | ▲ +85.5% |
| 2001 | -0.13x | $-251.41K | $1.89 Million | ▲ +56.3% |
| 2000 | -0.30x | $-791.09K | $2.60 Million | ▼ -1697.4% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $59.99K | $3.15 Million | ▲ +332.2% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | $16.60K | $3.77 Million | ▼ -60.5% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $40.41K | $3.63 Million | ▲ +127.1% |
| 1996 | -0.04x | $-211.49K | $5.14 Million | — |