United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.48x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-3.86 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.13 Million) in one year. Check UAMY cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
United States Antimony Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for United States Antimony Corporation across 29 annual periods. Check United States Antimony Corporation cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for United States Antimony Corporation (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for United States Antimony Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.37x | $2.22 Million | $6.04 Million | ▲ +119.9% |
| 2023 | -1.85x | $-4.75 Million | $2.57 Million | ▼ -1995.9% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-249.28K | $2.83 Million | ▲ +90.5% |
| 2021 | -0.92x | $-2.43 Million | $2.63 Million | ▼ -332.2% |
| 2020 | -0.21x | $-1.31 Million | $6.11 Million | ▼ -9731.5% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | $-11.36K | $5.23 Million | ▲ +98.0% |
| 2018 | -0.11x | $-656.63K | $6.13 Million | ▼ -200.9% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $716.71K | $6.75 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $425.84K | $6.42 Million | ▲ +7.3% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $358.45K | $5.80 Million | ▲ +121.2% |
| 2014 | -0.29x | $-1.04 Million | $3.55 Million | ▼ -583.6% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $234.82K | $3.89 Million | ▼ -64.5% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $526.42K | $3.10 Million | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | $564.04K | $2.23 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2010 | 0.32x | $307.35K | $974.23K | ▲ +192.9% |
| 2009 | -0.34x | $-358.19K | $1.05 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2008 | -0.25x | $-378.58K | $1.49 Million | ▼ -91.8% |
| 2007 | -0.13x | $-347.30K | $2.62 Million | ▼ -319.0% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $137.46K | $2.27 Million | ▲ +146.8% |
| 2005 | -0.13x | $-302.53K | $2.34 Million | ▲ +35.3% |
| 2004 | -0.20x | $-426.04K | $2.13 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2003 | -0.17x | $-449.46K | $2.70 Million | ▼ -768.2% |
| 2002 | -0.02x | $-44.49K | $2.32 Million | ▲ +85.5% |
| 2001 | -0.13x | $-251.41K | $1.89 Million | ▲ +56.3% |
| 2000 | -0.30x | $-791.09K | $2.60 Million | ▼ -1697.4% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $59.99K | $3.15 Million | ▲ +332.2% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | $16.60K | $3.77 Million | ▼ -60.5% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $40.41K | $3.63 Million | ▲ +127.1% |
| 1996 | -0.04x | $-211.49K | $5.14 Million | — |