Miller Industries Inc (MLR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Miller Industries Inc (MLR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.11x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $19.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($183.69 Million) in one year. Check Miller Industries Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Miller Industries Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Miller Industries Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore MLR total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Miller Industries Inc (1994–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Miller Industries Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Miller Industries Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.06x | $16.87 Million | $265.99 Million | ▲ +73.1% |
| 2023 | 0.04x | $10.96 Million | $299.29 Million | ▲ +139.8% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-19.16 Million | $207.97 Million | ▼ -192.3% |
| 2021 | 0.10x | $15.27 Million | $153.03 Million | ▼ -80.9% |
| 2020 | 0.52x | $60.71 Million | $115.96 Million | ▲ +99.8% |
| 2019 | 0.26x | $35.13 Million | $134.04 Million | ▲ +68.3% |
| 2018 | 0.16x | $21.90 Million | $140.62 Million | ▲ +27.4% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $13.95 Million | $114.14 Million | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2016 | 0.19x | $20.93 Million | $112.84 Million | ▼ -10.3% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | $20.06 Million | $96.99 Million | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $9.91 Million | $93.90 Million | ▲ +475.3% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $1.19 Million | $64.96 Million | ▼ -86.5% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $6.11 Million | $44.86 Million | ▼ -71.6% |
| 2011 | 0.48x | $28.34 Million | $59.19 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2010 | 0.36x | $17.52 Million | $49.31 Million | ▼ -44.3% |
| 2009 | 0.64x | $19.72 Million | $30.88 Million | ▲ +486.0% |
| 2008 | 0.11x | $4.61 Million | $42.31 Million | ▼ -78.4% |
| 2007 | 0.51x | $28.57 Million | $56.55 Million | ▲ +134.2% |
| 2006 | 0.22x | $18.13 Million | $84.05 Million | ▲ +28.9% |
| 2005 | 0.17x | $13.36 Million | $79.81 Million | ▲ +337.4% |
| 2004 | -0.07x | $-5.71 Million | $81.04 Million | ▼ -154.7% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $13.38 Million | $103.82 Million | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $19.59 Million | $122.48 Million | ▲ +22.9% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | $21.87 Million | $168.12 Million | ▲ +220.5% |
| 2000 | 0.04x | $8.52 Million | $209.87 Million | ▲ +138.0% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $3.50 Million | $205.20 Million | ▲ +116.8% |
| 1998 | -0.10x | $-20.30 Million | $200.00 Million | ▼ -20.7% |
| 1997 | -0.08x | $-11.00 Million | $130.80 Million | ▼ -1312.8% |
| 1996 | -0.01x | $-300.00K | $50.40 Million | ▲ +32.1% |
| 1995 | -0.01x | $-300.00K | $34.20 Million | ▲ +92.4% |
| 1994 | -0.12x | $-3.70 Million | $32.00 Million | — |