ArcelorMittal SA ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
ArcelorMittal SA ADR cash flow-to-debt ratio. ArcelorMittal SA ADR (MT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $952.94 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($42.33 Billion) in one year. Check MT cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of ArcelorMittal SA ADR (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of ArcelorMittal SA ADR from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for ArcelorMittal SA ADR across 29 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of ArcelorMittal SA ADR to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
ArcelorMittal SA ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
ArcelorMittal SA ADR cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for ArcelorMittal SA ADR. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see MT cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $4.81 Billion | $41.17 Billion | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2024 | 0.13x | $4.85 Billion | $38.10 Billion | ▼ -37.0% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | $7.64 Billion | $37.85 Billion | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2022 | 0.26x | $10.20 Billion | $38.96 Billion | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2021 | 0.25x | $9.90 Billion | $39.17 Billion | ▲ +164.3% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $4.08 Billion | $42.66 Billion | ▼ -24.6% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $6.02 Billion | $47.42 Billion | ▲ +42.5% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $4.20 Billion | $47.14 Billion | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $4.56 Billion | $44.44 Billion | ▲ +62.3% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $2.71 Billion | $42.82 Billion | ▲ +44.9% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | $2.15 Billion | $49.28 Billion | ▼ -39.1% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $3.87 Billion | $54.02 Billion | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $4.30 Billion | $59.13 Billion | ▼ -18.5% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $5.29 Billion | $59.38 Billion | ▲ +208.1% |
| 2011 | 0.03x | $1.78 Billion | $61.40 Billion | ▼ -53.3% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $4.01 Billion | $64.80 Billion | ▼ -47.0% |
| 2009 | 0.12x | $7.28 Billion | $62.30 Billion | ▼ -41.1% |
| 2008 | 0.20x | $14.65 Billion | $73.86 Billion | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2007 | 0.23x | $16.53 Billion | $72.09 Billion | ▲ +99.6% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | $7.12 Billion | $61.98 Billion | ▼ -44.9% |
| 2005 | 0.21x | $3.97 Billion | $19.06 Billion | ▼ -47.7% |
| 2004 | 0.40x | $4.61 Billion | $11.56 Billion | ▲ +1057.4% |
| 2003 | 0.03x | $189.00 Million | $5.49 Billion | ▲ +10.4% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | $168.00 Million | $5.38 Billion | ▲ +288.1% |
| 2001 | 0.01x | $40.00 Million | $4.97 Billion | ▼ -89.3% |
| 2000 | 0.07x | $381.00 Million | $5.09 Billion | ▼ -36.2% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $599.00 Million | $5.11 Billion | ▲ +137.4% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $253.00 Million | $5.13 Billion | ▼ -56.7% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $259.00 Million | $2.27 Billion | — |