Nokia Corp ADR (NOK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Nokia Corp ADR (NOK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $370.36 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($16.53 Billion) in one year. See Nokia Corp ADR free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Nokia Corp ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Nokia Corp ADR across 31 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Nokia Corp ADR to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Nokia Corp ADR (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Nokia Corp ADR. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see NOK company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $1.99 Billion | $16.53 Billion | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $2.49 Billion | $18.40 Billion | ▲ +97.8% |
| 2023 | 0.07x | $1.32 Billion | $19.23 Billion | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.07x | $1.47 Billion | $21.52 Billion | ▼ -41.1% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | $2.63 Billion | $22.59 Billion | ▲ +106.0% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $1.76 Billion | $31.17 Billion | ▲ +312.7% |
| 2019 | 0.01x | $390.00 Million | $28.52 Billion | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2018 | 0.01x | $360.00 Million | $24.16 Billion | ▼ -79.6% |
| 2017 | 0.07x | $1.81 Billion | $24.81 Billion | ▲ +220.1% |
| 2016 | -0.06x | $-1.46 Billion | $23.93 Billion | ▼ -224.8% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | $507.00 Million | $10.40 Billion | ▼ -52.6% |
| 2014 | 0.10x | $1.27 Billion | $12.39 Billion | ▲ +2547.7% |
| 2013 | 0.00x | $72.00 Million | $18.53 Billion | ▲ +122.5% |
| 2012 | -0.02x | $-354.00 Million | $20.50 Billion | ▼ -133.8% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | $1.14 Billion | $22.29 Billion | ▼ -75.5% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $4.77 Billion | $22.89 Billion | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | $3.25 Billion | $20.99 Billion | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | $3.20 Billion | $23.13 Billion | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2007 | 0.39x | $7.89 Billion | $20.29 Billion | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2006 | 0.42x | $4.48 Billion | $10.56 Billion | ▲ +1.7% |
| 2005 | 0.42x | $4.14 Billion | $9.93 Billion | ▼ -20.7% |
| 2004 | 0.53x | $4.34 Billion | $8.26 Billion | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2003 | 0.61x | $5.24 Billion | $8.59 Billion | ▼ -7.0% |
| 2002 | 0.66x | $5.82 Billion | $8.88 Billion | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2001 | 0.65x | $6.56 Billion | $10.04 Billion | ▲ +65.7% |
| 2000 | 0.39x | $3.52 Billion | $8.93 Billion | ▼ -13.9% |
| 1999 | 0.46x | $3.11 Billion | $6.80 Billion | ▲ +31.9% |
| 1998 | 0.35x | $1.68 Billion | $4.84 Billion | ▼ -31.9% |
| 1997 | 0.51x | $1.71 Billion | $3.36 Billion | ▲ +6.1% |
| 1996 | 0.48x | $1.44 Billion | $2.99 Billion | ▲ +1486.4% |
| 1995 | -0.03x | $-114.26 Million | $3.30 Billion | — |