Nu Skin Enterprises Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Nu Skin Enterprises Inc (NUS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $10.62 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($578.79 Million) in one year. Check NUS capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Nu Skin Enterprises Inc (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Nu Skin Enterprises Inc from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Nu Skin Enterprises Inc across 31 annual periods. Check earnings quality score of Nu Skin Enterprises Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Nu Skin Enterprises Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Nu Skin Enterprises Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | $80.29 Million | $600.07 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $111.74 Million | $817.46 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $118.64 Million | $984.50 Million | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $108.06 Million | $923.67 Million | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $141.58 Million | $993.71 Million | ▼ -60.1% |
| 2020 | 0.36x | $379.14 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +79.2% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $177.93 Million | $893.72 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $202.74 Million | $912.58 Million | ▼ -35.0% |
| 2017 | 0.34x | $302.56 Million | $885.28 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2016 | 0.34x | $275.26 Million | $809.98 Million | ▼ -28.2% |
| 2015 | 0.47x | $322.11 Million | $680.22 Million | ▲ +663.6% |
| 2014 | -0.08x | $-56.46 Million | $672.00 Million | ▼ -115.3% |
| 2013 | 0.55x | $530.18 Million | $962.44 Million | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2012 | 0.55x | $310.98 Million | $562.29 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2011 | 0.54x | $224.31 Million | $416.72 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2010 | 0.45x | $187.88 Million | $420.98 Million | ▲ +24.2% |
| 2009 | 0.36x | $133.94 Million | $372.76 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2008 | 0.26x | $103.31 Million | $393.59 Million | ▲ +120.2% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $48.65 Million | $408.23 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2006 | 0.22x | $75.80 Million | $345.87 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2005 | 0.35x | $114.10 Million | $324.24 Million | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2004 | 0.42x | $130.35 Million | $313.50 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $109.03 Million | $333.50 Million | ▼ -33.7% |
| 2002 | 0.49x | $111.12 Million | $225.35 Million | ▲ +34.1% |
| 2001 | 0.37x | $74.42 Million | $202.46 Million | ▲ +89.8% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | $43.39 Million | $224.07 Million | ▲ +113.3% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $30.30 Million | $333.80 Million | ▼ -73.1% |
| 1998 | 0.34x | $118.60 Million | $351.80 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 1997 | 0.53x | $92.70 Million | $174.90 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 1996 | 0.54x | $121.20 Million | $223.90 Million | ▼ -53.0% |
| 1995 | 1.15x | $65.00 Million | $56.40 Million | — |