Nu Skin Enterprises Inc (NUS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc (NUS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $10.62 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($578.79 Million) in one year. See Nu Skin Enterprises Inc (NUS) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Nu Skin Enterprises Inc across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see NUS cash generation efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Nu Skin Enterprises Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Nu Skin Enterprises Inc. Check NUS cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.13x | $80.29 Million | $600.07 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $111.74 Million | $817.46 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $118.64 Million | $984.50 Million | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $108.06 Million | $923.67 Million | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $141.58 Million | $993.71 Million | ▼ -60.1% |
| 2020 | 0.36x | $379.14 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +79.2% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $177.93 Million | $893.72 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $202.74 Million | $912.58 Million | ▼ -35.0% |
| 2017 | 0.34x | $302.56 Million | $885.28 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2016 | 0.34x | $275.26 Million | $809.98 Million | ▼ -28.2% |
| 2015 | 0.47x | $322.11 Million | $680.22 Million | ▲ +663.6% |
| 2014 | -0.08x | $-56.46 Million | $672.00 Million | ▼ -115.3% |
| 2013 | 0.55x | $530.18 Million | $962.44 Million | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2012 | 0.55x | $310.98 Million | $562.29 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2011 | 0.54x | $224.31 Million | $416.72 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2010 | 0.45x | $187.88 Million | $420.98 Million | ▲ +24.2% |
| 2009 | 0.36x | $133.94 Million | $372.76 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2008 | 0.26x | $103.31 Million | $393.59 Million | ▲ +120.2% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $48.65 Million | $408.23 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2006 | 0.22x | $75.80 Million | $345.87 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2005 | 0.35x | $114.10 Million | $324.24 Million | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2004 | 0.42x | $130.35 Million | $313.50 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $109.03 Million | $333.50 Million | ▼ -33.7% |
| 2002 | 0.49x | $111.12 Million | $225.35 Million | ▲ +34.1% |
| 2001 | 0.37x | $74.42 Million | $202.46 Million | ▲ +89.8% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | $43.39 Million | $224.07 Million | ▲ +113.3% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $30.30 Million | $333.80 Million | ▼ -73.1% |
| 1998 | 0.34x | $118.60 Million | $351.80 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 1997 | 0.53x | $92.70 Million | $174.90 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 1996 | 0.54x | $121.20 Million | $223.90 Million | ▼ -53.0% |
| 1995 | 1.15x | $65.00 Million | $56.40 Million | — |