Nu Skin Enterprises Inc (NUS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc (NUS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $27.48 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($624.61 Million) in one year. Explore Nu Skin Enterprises Inc (NUS) long-term investment share to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Nu Skin Enterprises Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Nu Skin Enterprises Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore Nu Skin Enterprises Inc balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Nu Skin Enterprises Inc (1995–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Nu Skin Enterprises Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Nu Skin Enterprises Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.14x | $111.74 Million | $817.46 Million | ▲ +13.4% |
| 2023 | 0.12x | $118.64 Million | $984.50 Million | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $108.06 Million | $923.67 Million | ▼ -17.9% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $141.58 Million | $993.71 Million | ▼ -60.1% |
| 2020 | 0.36x | $379.14 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +79.2% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $177.93 Million | $893.72 Million | ▼ -10.4% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | $202.74 Million | $912.58 Million | ▼ -35.0% |
| 2017 | 0.34x | $302.56 Million | $885.28 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2016 | 0.34x | $275.26 Million | $809.98 Million | ▼ -28.2% |
| 2015 | 0.47x | $322.11 Million | $680.22 Million | ▲ +663.6% |
| 2014 | -0.08x | $-56.46 Million | $672.00 Million | ▼ -115.3% |
| 2013 | 0.55x | $530.18 Million | $962.44 Million | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2012 | 0.55x | $310.98 Million | $562.29 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2011 | 0.54x | $224.31 Million | $416.72 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2010 | 0.45x | $187.88 Million | $420.98 Million | ▲ +24.2% |
| 2009 | 0.36x | $133.94 Million | $372.76 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2008 | 0.26x | $103.31 Million | $393.59 Million | ▲ +120.2% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $48.65 Million | $408.23 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2006 | 0.22x | $75.80 Million | $345.87 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2005 | 0.35x | $114.10 Million | $324.24 Million | ▼ -15.4% |
| 2004 | 0.42x | $130.35 Million | $313.50 Million | ▲ +27.2% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $109.03 Million | $333.50 Million | ▼ -33.7% |
| 2002 | 0.49x | $111.12 Million | $225.35 Million | ▲ +34.1% |
| 2001 | 0.37x | $74.42 Million | $202.46 Million | ▲ +89.8% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | $43.39 Million | $224.07 Million | ▲ +113.3% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $30.30 Million | $333.80 Million | ▼ -73.1% |
| 1998 | 0.34x | $118.60 Million | $351.80 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 1997 | 0.53x | $92.70 Million | $174.90 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 1996 | 0.54x | $121.20 Million | $223.90 Million | ▼ -53.0% |
| 1995 | 1.15x | $65.00 Million | $56.40 Million | — |