ONEOK Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
ONEOK Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. ONEOK Inc (OKE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.62 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($44.46 Billion) in one year. Check how aggressively does ONEOK Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of ONEOK Inc (1994–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of ONEOK Inc from 1994 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for ONEOK Inc across 31 annual periods. Check ONEOK Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
ONEOK Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2024)
ONEOK Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for ONEOK Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see OKE cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.12x | $4.89 Billion | $41.94 Billion | ▼ -26.8% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $4.42 Billion | $27.78 Billion | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2022 | 0.16x | $2.91 Billion | $17.89 Billion | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $2.55 Billion | $17.61 Billion | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $1.90 Billion | $17.04 Billion | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $1.95 Billion | $15.59 Billion | ▼ -33.4% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | $2.19 Billion | $11.65 Billion | ▲ +59.2% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $1.32 Billion | $11.16 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | $1.35 Billion | $12.71 Billion | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $1.01 Billion | $11.68 Billion | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $1.29 Billion | $11.30 Billion | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $1.29 Billion | $12.86 Billion | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $990.94 Million | $11.62 Billion | ▼ -38.0% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $1.36 Billion | $9.90 Billion | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $834.04 Million | $8.58 Billion | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | $1.45 Billion | $9.38 Billion | ▲ +224.2% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $475.68 Million | $9.96 Billion | ▼ -61.5% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $1.03 Billion | $8.29 Billion | ▲ +6.5% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $873.39 Million | $7.49 Billion | ▲ +633.6% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | $-179.66 Million | $8.22 Billion | ▼ -159.6% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $204.81 Million | $5.59 Billion | ▲ +4455.5% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | $4.08 Million | $5.07 Billion | ▼ -99.6% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | $812.28 Million | $4.37 Billion | ▲ +111.8% |
| 2001 | 0.09x | $405.35 Million | $4.61 Billion | ▲ +305.0% |
| 2000 | -0.04x | $-263.33 Million | $6.14 Billion | ▼ -1172.6% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $-7.03 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▼ -101.2% |
| 1998 | 0.28x | $346.53 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▲ +40.8% |
| 1997 | 0.20x | $152.10 Million | $774.80 Million | ▲ +48.7% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $105.10 Million | $796.20 Million | ▼ -6.9% |
| 1995 | 0.14x | $109.50 Million | $771.90 Million | ▲ +33.8% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $80.30 Million | $757.50 Million | — |