ONEOK Inc (OKE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
ONEOK Inc (OKE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.62 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($44.46 Billion) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of ONEOK Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
ONEOK Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for ONEOK Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore ONEOK Inc total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for ONEOK Inc (1994–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for ONEOK Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see ONEOK Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.12x | $4.89 Billion | $41.94 Billion | ▼ -26.8% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $4.42 Billion | $27.78 Billion | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2022 | 0.16x | $2.91 Billion | $17.89 Billion | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $2.55 Billion | $17.61 Billion | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $1.90 Billion | $17.04 Billion | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $1.95 Billion | $15.59 Billion | ▼ -33.4% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | $2.19 Billion | $11.65 Billion | ▲ +59.2% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $1.32 Billion | $11.16 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | $1.35 Billion | $12.71 Billion | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $1.01 Billion | $11.68 Billion | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $1.29 Billion | $11.30 Billion | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $1.29 Billion | $12.86 Billion | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $990.94 Million | $11.62 Billion | ▼ -38.0% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $1.36 Billion | $9.90 Billion | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $834.04 Million | $8.58 Billion | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | $1.45 Billion | $9.38 Billion | ▲ +224.2% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $475.68 Million | $9.96 Billion | ▼ -61.5% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $1.03 Billion | $8.29 Billion | ▲ +6.5% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $873.39 Million | $7.49 Billion | ▲ +633.6% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | $-179.66 Million | $8.22 Billion | ▼ -159.6% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $204.81 Million | $5.59 Billion | ▲ +4455.5% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | $4.08 Million | $5.07 Billion | ▼ -99.6% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | $812.28 Million | $4.37 Billion | ▲ +111.8% |
| 2001 | 0.09x | $405.35 Million | $4.61 Billion | ▲ +305.0% |
| 2000 | -0.04x | $-263.33 Million | $6.14 Billion | ▼ -1172.6% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $-7.03 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▼ -101.2% |
| 1998 | 0.28x | $346.53 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▲ +40.8% |
| 1997 | 0.20x | $152.10 Million | $774.80 Million | ▲ +48.7% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $105.10 Million | $796.20 Million | ▼ -6.9% |
| 1995 | 0.14x | $109.50 Million | $771.90 Million | ▲ +33.8% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $80.30 Million | $757.50 Million | — |