ONEOK Inc (OKE) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
ONEOK Inc (OKE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.62 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($44.46 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of ONEOK Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
ONEOK Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for ONEOK Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore OKE shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for ONEOK Inc (1994–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for ONEOK Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is ONEOK Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.12x | $4.89 Billion | $41.94 Billion | ▼ -26.8% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $4.42 Billion | $27.78 Billion | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2022 | 0.16x | $2.91 Billion | $17.89 Billion | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $2.55 Billion | $17.61 Billion | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $1.90 Billion | $17.04 Billion | ▼ -10.8% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $1.95 Billion | $15.59 Billion | ▼ -33.4% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | $2.19 Billion | $11.65 Billion | ▲ +59.2% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $1.32 Billion | $11.16 Billion | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | $1.35 Billion | $12.71 Billion | ▲ +23.3% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $1.01 Billion | $11.68 Billion | ▼ -24.2% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | $1.29 Billion | $11.30 Billion | ▲ +13.0% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | $1.29 Billion | $12.86 Billion | ▲ +18.1% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $990.94 Million | $11.62 Billion | ▼ -38.0% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $1.36 Billion | $9.90 Billion | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2010 | 0.10x | $834.04 Million | $8.58 Billion | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | $1.45 Billion | $9.38 Billion | ▲ +224.2% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | $475.68 Million | $9.96 Billion | ▼ -61.5% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $1.03 Billion | $8.29 Billion | ▲ +6.5% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | $873.39 Million | $7.49 Billion | ▲ +633.6% |
| 2005 | -0.02x | $-179.66 Million | $8.22 Billion | ▼ -159.6% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $204.81 Million | $5.59 Billion | ▲ +4455.5% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | $4.08 Million | $5.07 Billion | ▼ -99.6% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | $812.28 Million | $4.37 Billion | ▲ +111.8% |
| 2001 | 0.09x | $405.35 Million | $4.61 Billion | ▲ +305.0% |
| 2000 | -0.04x | $-263.33 Million | $6.14 Billion | ▼ -1172.6% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | $-7.03 Million | $2.09 Billion | ▼ -101.2% |
| 1998 | 0.28x | $346.53 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▲ +40.8% |
| 1997 | 0.20x | $152.10 Million | $774.80 Million | ▲ +48.7% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $105.10 Million | $796.20 Million | ▼ -6.9% |
| 1995 | 0.14x | $109.50 Million | $771.90 Million | ▲ +33.8% |
| 1994 | 0.11x | $80.30 Million | $757.50 Million | — |