Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Latest as of September 2025:
0.09x
Oshkosh Corporation (OSK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $489.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.30 Billion) in one year. See OSK FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
0.09x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities
Operating Cash Flow
$489.00 Million
USD
Total Liabilities
$5.30 Billion
USD
Data as of
Sep 2025
Most recent filing
Oshkosh Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Oshkosh Corporation across 71 annual periods. Also explore Oshkosh Corporation annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Oshkosh Corporation (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Oshkosh Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see OSK stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.10x | $550.10 Million | $5.27 Billion | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $599.60 Million | $5.42 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $599.60 Million | $5.42 Billion | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $601.30 Million | $4.54 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $601.30 Million | $4.54 Billion | ▼ -60.5% |
| 2021 | 0.34x | $1.22 Billion | $3.65 Billion | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2021 | 0.34x | $1.22 Billion | $3.64 Billion | ▲ +203.7% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $327.30 Million | $2.97 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | $327.30 Million | $2.97 Billion | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | $568.30 Million | $2.97 Billion | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $589.10 Million | $2.97 Billion | ▲ +26.6% |
| 2018 | 0.16x | $436.30 Million | $2.78 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.16x | $436.30 Million | $2.78 Billion | ▲ +77.7% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $246.50 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $246.50 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▼ -61.2% |
| 2016 | 0.23x | $577.70 Million | $2.54 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2016 | 0.23x | $577.70 Million | $2.54 Billion | ▲ +629.0% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $82.50 Million | $2.64 Billion | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $82.50 Million | $2.70 Billion | ▼ -53.4% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $170.40 Million | $2.60 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $170.40 Million | $2.60 Billion | ▼ -60.3% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $438.00 Million | $2.66 Billion | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $438.00 Million | $2.65 Billion | ▲ +90.4% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $268.30 Million | $3.09 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $268.30 Million | $3.09 Billion | ▼ -27.8% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $387.70 Million | $3.23 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $387.70 Million | $3.23 Billion | ▼ -34.5% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $619.70 Million | $3.38 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $619.70 Million | $3.38 Billion | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $898.90 Million | $4.25 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $898.90 Million | $4.25 Billion | ▲ +154.0% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $390.40 Million | $4.69 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $390.40 Million | $4.69 Billion | ▲ +2.6% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | $406.00 Million | $5.00 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | $406.00 Million | $5.00 Billion | ▼ -52.2% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $177.41 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $177.41 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2005 | 0.24x | $212.31 Million | $896.49 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2005 | 0.24x | $212.31 Million | $896.49 Million | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2004 | 0.17x | $134.92 Million | $813.69 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2004 | 0.17x | $134.92 Million | $813.69 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | $105.27 Million | $564.27 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.19x | $105.27 Million | $564.27 Million | ▼ -56.6% |
| 2002 | 0.43x | $263.97 Million | $614.57 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2002 | 0.43x | $263.97 Million | $614.57 Million | ▲ +3908.9% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-8.37 Million | $742.24 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-8.37 Million | $742.24 Million | ▼ -111.4% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | $51.70 Million | $521.73 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | $51.70 Million | $495.32 Million | ▲ +58.0% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | $39.00 Million | $590.39 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | $39.00 Million | $590.40 Million | ▼ -53.6% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $78.80 Million | $553.70 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | $78.80 Million | $553.70 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $64.10 Million | $299.50 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $64.10 Million | $299.50 Million | ▲ +683.6% |
| 1996 | -0.04x | $-11.50 Million | $313.60 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1996 | -0.04x | $-11.50 Million | $313.60 Million | ▼ -114.7% |
| 1995 | 0.25x | $16.80 Million | $67.50 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1995 | 0.25x | $16.80 Million | $67.50 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 1994 | 0.67x | $64.30 Million | $95.30 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1994 | 0.67x | $64.30 Million | $95.30 Million | ▲ +147.9% |
| 1993 | 0.27x | $38.40 Million | $141.10 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1993 | 0.27x | $38.40 Million | $141.10 Million | ▲ +311.7% |
| 1992 | -0.13x | $-18.50 Million | $143.90 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.13x | $-18.50 Million | $143.90 Million | ▼ -95.6% |
| 1991 | -0.07x | $-7.10 Million | $108.00 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1991 | -0.07x | $-7.10 Million | $108.00 Million | ▼ -114.2% |
| 1990 | 0.46x | $27.90 Million | $60.10 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1990 | 0.46x | $27.90 Million | $60.10 Million | ▲ +365.5% |
| 1989 | 0.10x | $7.30 Million | $73.20 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1989 | 0.10x | $7.30 Million | $73.20 Million | — |
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.