RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.02x

RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $63.30 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.59 Billion) in one year. See RLJ Lodging Trust free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.02x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

$63.30 Million
USD

Total Liabilities

$2.59 Billion
USD

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

RLJ Lodging Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for RLJ Lodging Trust across 17 annual periods. Also explore RLJ Lodging Trust equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for RLJ Lodging Trust (2008–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for RLJ Lodging Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see RLJ company net worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (USD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 0.11x $285.42 Million $2.59 Billion ▼ -10.0%
2023 0.12x $315.14 Million $2.57 Billion ▲ +21.9%
2022 0.10x $256.52 Million $2.55 Billion ▲ +540.5%
2021 0.02x $42.96 Million $2.74 Billion ▲ +127.3%
2020 -0.06x $-168.71 Million $2.93 Billion ▼ -138.0%
2019 0.15x $397.32 Million $2.62 Billion ▼ -3.8%
2018 0.16x $394.83 Million $2.51 Billion ▲ +94.8%
2017 0.08x $260.60 Million $3.22 Billion ▼ -56.4%
2016 0.19x $331.36 Million $1.79 Billion ▲ +0.3%
2015 0.18x $328.91 Million $1.78 Billion ▲ +8.2%
2014 0.17x $298.83 Million $1.75 Billion ▲ +6.8%
2013 0.16x $251.39 Million $1.57 Billion ▲ +39.7%
2012 0.11x $176.13 Million $1.54 Billion ▲ +24.3%
2011 0.09x $134.12 Million $1.46 Billion ▲ +161.9%
2010 0.04x $64.08 Million $1.82 Billion ▲ +167.9%
2009 0.01x $28.85 Million $2.20 Billion ▼ -62.1%
2008 0.03x $76.98 Million $2.22 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.