Smith & Nephew SNATS Inc (SNN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Smith & Nephew SNATS Inc (SNN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.17x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $888.43 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.17 Billion) in one year. See SNN free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Smith & Nephew SNATS Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Smith & Nephew SNATS Inc across 35 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Smith & Nephew SNATS Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Smith & Nephew SNATS Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Smith & Nephew SNATS Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SNN stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.25x | $1.29 Billion | $5.17 Billion | ▲ +28.5% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $987.00 Million | $5.09 Billion | ▲ +52.2% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $608.00 Million | $4.77 Billion | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $468.00 Million | $4.71 Billion | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $877.00 Million | $5.35 Billion | ▲ +0.5% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $935.00 Million | $5.73 Billion | ▼ -41.9% |
| 2019 | 0.28x | $1.17 Billion | $4.16 Billion | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2018 | 0.29x | $931.00 Million | $3.19 Billion | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2017 | 0.34x | $1.09 Billion | $3.22 Billion | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2016 | 0.25x | $849.00 Million | $3.39 Billion | ▼ -22.1% |
| 2015 | 0.32x | $1.03 Billion | $3.20 Billion | ▲ +53.9% |
| 2014 | 0.21x | $683.00 Million | $3.27 Billion | ▼ -57.3% |
| 2013 | 0.49x | $867.00 Million | $1.77 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2012 | 0.51x | $902.00 Million | $1.76 Billion | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2011 | 0.54x | $842.00 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▲ +23.2% |
| 2010 | 0.44x | $859.00 Million | $1.96 Billion | ▲ +45.4% |
| 2009 | 0.30x | $719.00 Million | $2.39 Billion | ▲ +49.6% |
| 2008 | 0.20x | $566.00 Million | $2.81 Billion | ▲ +25.7% |
| 2007 | 0.16x | $424.00 Million | $2.65 Billion | ▼ -51.9% |
| 2006 | 0.33x | $352.00 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +97.4% |
| 2005 | 0.17x | $260.00 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▼ -26.9% |
| 2004 | 0.23x | $363.28 Million | $1.57 Billion | ▼ -10.0% |
| 2003 | 0.26x | $276.79 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▲ +22.6% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | $242.85 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▲ +46.3% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | $144.46 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▲ +130.5% |
| 2000 | -0.47x | $-486.02 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -382.4% |
| 1999 | 0.17x | $115.02 Million | $693.35 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 1998 | 0.17x | $117.19 Million | $696.82 Million | ▼ -1.6% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $113.57 Million | $664.55 Million | ▼ -16.3% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | $142.14 Million | $695.96 Million | ▲ +82.4% |
| 1995 | 0.11x | $72.47 Million | $647.14 Million | ▼ -40.3% |
| 1994 | 0.19x | $117.10 Million | $624.74 Million | ▲ +242.8% |
| 1993 | 0.05x | $43.34 Million | $792.70 Million | ▼ -42.9% |
| 1992 | 0.10x | $76.14 Million | $795.20 Million | ▼ -6.1% |
| 1991 | 0.10x | $106.47 Million | $1.04 Billion | — |