STMicroelectronics NV ADR (STM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
STMicroelectronics NV ADR (STM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $535.63 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.96 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of STMicroelectronics NV ADR to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
STMicroelectronics NV ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for STMicroelectronics NV ADR across 30 annual periods. Also explore STM net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for STMicroelectronics NV ADR (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for STMicroelectronics NV ADR. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is STMicroelectronics NV ADR worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.33x | $2.15 Billion | $6.58 Billion | ▼ -22.0% |
| 2024 | 0.42x | $2.96 Billion | $7.06 Billion | ▼ -46.8% |
| 2023 | 0.79x | $5.99 Billion | $7.60 Billion | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2022 | 0.75x | $5.58 Billion | $7.48 Billion | ▲ +47.1% |
| 2021 | 0.51x | $3.46 Billion | $6.83 Billion | ▲ +44.3% |
| 2020 | 0.35x | $2.46 Billion | $7.00 Billion | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2019 | 0.39x | $1.87 Billion | $4.76 Billion | ▼ -0.8% |
| 2018 | 0.40x | $1.84 Billion | $4.66 Billion | ▲ +19.1% |
| 2017 | 0.33x | $1.68 Billion | $5.05 Billion | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2016 | 0.31x | $1.04 Billion | $3.41 Billion | ▲ +26.7% |
| 2015 | 0.24x | $846.00 Million | $3.50 Billion | ▲ +33.4% |
| 2014 | 0.18x | $715.00 Million | $3.95 Billion | ▲ +71.0% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $366.00 Million | $3.46 Billion | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $612.00 Million | $4.07 Billion | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | $880.00 Million | $4.10 Billion | ▼ -41.9% |
| 2010 | 0.37x | $1.79 Billion | $4.85 Billion | ▼ -98.7% |
| 2009 | 28.85x | $152.67 Billion | $5.29 Billion | ▲ +1057.1% |
| 2008 | -3.01x | $-16.52 Billion | $5.48 Billion | ▼ -747.4% |
| 2007 | 0.47x | $2.19 Billion | $4.70 Billion | ▼ -17.8% |
| 2006 | 0.57x | $2.49 Billion | $4.40 Billion | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2005 | 0.46x | $1.80 Billion | $3.91 Billion | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2004 | 0.50x | $2.34 Billion | $4.64 Billion | ▲ +40.1% |
| 2003 | 0.36x | $1.92 Billion | $5.33 Billion | ▲ +4.4% |
| 2002 | 0.34x | $1.71 Billion | $4.97 Billion | ▼ -21.2% |
| 2001 | 0.44x | $2.05 Billion | $4.69 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2000 | 0.42x | $2.43 Billion | $5.72 Billion | ▼ -3.4% |
| 1999 | 0.44x | $1.47 Billion | $3.34 Billion | ▲ +1.1% |
| 1998 | 0.43x | $1.01 Billion | $2.33 Billion | ▼ -6.2% |
| 1997 | 0.46x | $983.79 Million | $2.12 Billion | ▼ -18.0% |
| 1996 | 0.57x | $980.67 Million | $1.74 Billion | — |