Constellation Brands Inc Class A (STZ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Constellation Brands Inc Class A (STZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of February 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $562.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($13.51 Billion) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Constellation Brands Inc Class A to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Constellation Brands Inc Class A Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Constellation Brands Inc Class A across 37 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Constellation Brands Inc Class A.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Constellation Brands Inc Class A (1990–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Constellation Brands Inc Class A. Check how high is Constellation Brands Inc Class A's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.20x | $2.67 Billion | $13.51 Billion | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2025 | 0.22x | $3.15 Billion | $14.52 Billion | ▲ +22.1% |
| 2024 | 0.18x | $2.78 Billion | $15.63 Billion | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | $2.76 Billion | $15.93 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2022 | 0.20x | $2.71 Billion | $13.81 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $2.81 Billion | $13.18 Billion | ▲ +24.0% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $2.55 Billion | $14.85 Billion | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $2.25 Billion | $16.39 Billion | ▼ -11.5% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $1.93 Billion | $12.48 Billion | ▲ +7.0% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $1.70 Billion | $11.72 Billion | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $1.41 Billion | $10.27 Billion | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2015 | 0.12x | $1.08 Billion | $9.26 Billion | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $826.20 Million | $9.32 Billion | ▼ -23.9% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | $556.30 Million | $4.78 Billion | ▼ -34.2% |
| 2012 | 0.18x | $784.10 Million | $4.43 Billion | ▲ +31.8% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $619.30 Million | $4.62 Billion | ▲ +83.9% |
| 2010 | 0.07x | $402.50 Million | $5.52 Billion | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $506.90 Million | $6.13 Billion | ▲ +16.0% |
| 2008 | 0.07x | $519.80 Million | $7.29 Billion | ▲ +37.1% |
| 2007 | 0.05x | $313.20 Million | $6.02 Billion | ▼ -47.2% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $435.97 Million | $4.43 Billion | ▲ +54.3% |
| 2005 | 0.06x | $320.70 Million | $5.02 Billion | ▼ -40.3% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $340.31 Million | $3.18 Billion | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2003 | 0.12x | $236.05 Million | $2.02 Billion | ▲ +15.7% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $213.30 Million | $2.11 Billion | ▲ +84.4% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | $103.78 Million | $1.90 Billion | ▼ -32.4% |
| 2000 | 0.08x | $148.06 Million | $1.83 Billion | ▲ +2.6% |
| 1999 | 0.08x | $107.20 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▲ +80.3% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $28.80 Million | $658.00 Million | ▼ -73.4% |
| 1997 | 0.16x | $107.80 Million | $656.20 Million | ▲ +235.2% |
| 1996 | -0.12x | $-84.80 Million | $698.10 Million | ▼ -425.9% |
| 1995 | 0.04x | $23.20 Million | $622.40 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 1994 | 0.04x | $8.90 Million | $229.10 Million | ▼ -70.7% |
| 1993 | 0.13x | $16.20 Million | $122.30 Million | ▲ +35.6% |
| 1992 | 0.10x | $9.30 Million | $95.20 Million | ▼ -29.2% |
| 1991 | 0.14x | $13.20 Million | $95.70 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 1990 | 0.14x | $13.50 Million | $96.50 Million | — |