Telefonica SA ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Telefonica SA ADR cash flow-to-debt ratio. Telefonica SA ADR (TEF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $2.44 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($71.22 Billion) in one year. Check TEF cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Telefonica SA ADR (1989–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Telefonica SA ADR from 1989 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Telefonica SA ADR across 29 annual periods. Check Telefonica SA ADR cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Telefonica SA ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2024)
Telefonica SA ADR cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Telefonica SA ADR. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TEF cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.14x | $10.99 Billion | $77.75 Billion | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $12.59 Billion | $77.23 Billion | ▲ +17.6% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $10.81 Billion | $77.93 Billion | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $10.27 Billion | $80.53 Billion | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | $13.20 Billion | $86.79 Billion | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2019 | 0.16x | $15.01 Billion | $93.43 Billion | ▲ +5.1% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $13.31 Billion | $87.07 Billion | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $13.79 Billion | $88.45 Billion | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $13.36 Billion | $95.26 Billion | ▼ -1.6% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $13.60 Billion | $95.42 Billion | ▲ +7.7% |
| 2014 | 0.13x | $12.18 Billion | $92.01 Billion | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $14.18 Billion | $91.38 Billion | ▲ +4.2% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $15.21 Billion | $102.11 Billion | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2011 | 0.17x | $17.48 Billion | $102.24 Billion | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2010 | 0.17x | $16.67 Billion | $98.09 Billion | ▼ -11.7% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $16.15 Billion | $83.87 Billion | ▼ -5.6% |
| 2008 | 0.20x | $16.38 Billion | $80.33 Billion | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2007 | 0.19x | $15.55 Billion | $83.02 Billion | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $15.41 Billion | $88.98 Billion | ▼ -11.3% |
| 2005 | 0.20x | $11.13 Billion | $56.97 Billion | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2004 | 0.23x | $10.18 Billion | $43.43 Billion | ▲ +4.3% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | $9.18 Billion | $40.82 Billion | ▲ +15.8% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | $8.81 Billion | $45.43 Billion | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2001 | 0.17x | $8.83 Billion | $53.15 Billion | ▼ -44.0% |
| 1996 | 0.30x | $5.81 Billion | $19.58 Billion | ▲ +812.3% |
| 1995 | 0.03x | $616.36 Million | $18.95 Billion | ▼ -83.3% |
| 1994 | 0.20x | $3.92 Billion | $20.12 Billion | ▲ +109.0% |
| 1990 | 0.09x | $1.42 Billion | $15.27 Billion | ▼ -54.4% |
| 1989 | 0.20x | $2.56 Billion | $12.51 Billion | — |