Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA ADR (TGS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA ADR (TGS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $141.22 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.29 Trillion) in one year. Explore Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA ADR long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA ADR across 28 annual periods. Also explore TGS total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA ADR (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA ADR. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TGS market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.28x | $642.72 Billion | $2.29 Trillion | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2024 | 0.42x | $484.17 Billion | $1.16 Trillion | ▲ +47.4% |
| 2023 | 0.28x | $412.82 Billion | $1.46 Trillion | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2022 | 0.53x | $240.15 Billion | $451.13 Billion | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2021 | 1.08x | $183.80 Billion | $170.61 Billion | ▲ +136.4% |
| 2020 | 0.46x | $28.51 Billion | $62.57 Billion | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2019 | 0.28x | $13.50 Billion | $47.52 Billion | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2018 | 0.41x | $12.80 Billion | $31.00 Billion | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2017 | 0.42x | $3.52 Billion | $8.35 Billion | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2016 | 0.33x | $2.14 Billion | $6.40 Billion | ▲ +237.7% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $489.30 Million | $4.95 Billion | ▼ -58.2% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $1.02 Billion | $4.31 Billion | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | $870.96 Million | $4.05 Billion | ▲ +41.6% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $535.11 Million | $3.52 Billion | ▲ +5.9% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $440.44 Million | $3.07 Billion | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | $320.51 Million | $2.32 Billion | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $511.64 Million | $2.40 Billion | ▼ -28.1% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | $582.08 Million | $1.96 Billion | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2007 | 0.25x | $518.63 Million | $2.07 Billion | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2006 | 0.26x | $605.44 Million | $2.35 Billion | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2005 | 0.21x | $584.47 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▲ +433.0% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $117.17 Million | $2.96 Billion | ▼ -74.5% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | $529.91 Million | $3.41 Billion | ▲ +136.3% |
| 2002 | 0.07x | $239.82 Million | $3.65 Billion | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2001 | 0.18x | $214.19 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2000 | 0.17x | $169.97 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $193.83 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -14.6% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $194.36 Million | $922.82 Million | — |