Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA ADR (TGS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA ADR (TGS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $141.22 Billion could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.29 Trillion) in one year. See cash generation quality of Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA ADR to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA ADR across 28 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA ADR to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA ADR (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Transportadora de Gas del Sur SA ADR. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TGS company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.28x | $642.72 Billion | $2.29 Trillion | ▼ -32.6% |
| 2024 | 0.42x | $484.17 Billion | $1.16 Trillion | ▲ +47.4% |
| 2023 | 0.28x | $412.82 Billion | $1.46 Trillion | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2022 | 0.53x | $240.15 Billion | $451.13 Billion | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2021 | 1.08x | $183.80 Billion | $170.61 Billion | ▲ +136.4% |
| 2020 | 0.46x | $28.51 Billion | $62.57 Billion | ▲ +60.4% |
| 2019 | 0.28x | $13.50 Billion | $47.52 Billion | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2018 | 0.41x | $12.80 Billion | $31.00 Billion | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2017 | 0.42x | $3.52 Billion | $8.35 Billion | ▲ +26.5% |
| 2016 | 0.33x | $2.14 Billion | $6.40 Billion | ▲ +237.7% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $489.30 Million | $4.95 Billion | ▼ -58.2% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $1.02 Billion | $4.31 Billion | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | $870.96 Million | $4.05 Billion | ▲ +41.6% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $535.11 Million | $3.52 Billion | ▲ +5.9% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $440.44 Million | $3.07 Billion | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | $320.51 Million | $2.32 Billion | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $511.64 Million | $2.40 Billion | ▼ -28.1% |
| 2008 | 0.30x | $582.08 Million | $1.96 Billion | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2007 | 0.25x | $518.63 Million | $2.07 Billion | ▼ -2.7% |
| 2006 | 0.26x | $605.44 Million | $2.35 Billion | ▲ +22.0% |
| 2005 | 0.21x | $584.47 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▲ +433.0% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $117.17 Million | $2.96 Billion | ▼ -74.5% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | $529.91 Million | $3.41 Billion | ▲ +136.3% |
| 2002 | 0.07x | $239.82 Million | $3.65 Billion | ▼ -64.4% |
| 2001 | 0.18x | $214.19 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2000 | 0.17x | $169.97 Million | $1.02 Billion | ▼ -7.5% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $193.83 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▼ -14.6% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $194.36 Million | $922.82 Million | — |