Timken Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Timken Company cash flow-to-debt ratio. Timken Company (TKR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $39.30 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.51 Billion) in one year. Check Timken Company (TKR) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Timken Company (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Timken Company from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Timken Company across 37 annual periods. Check Timken Company (TKR) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Timken Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Timken Company cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Timken Company. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Timken Company (TKR) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | $554.30 Million | $3.33 Billion | ▲ +19.9% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $475.70 Million | $3.43 Billion | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $545.20 Million | $3.84 Billion | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $463.80 Million | $3.42 Billion | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $387.30 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▼ -32.4% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | $577.60 Million | $2.82 Billion | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | $550.10 Million | $2.91 Billion | ▲ +59.6% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $332.50 Million | $2.80 Billion | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $236.80 Million | $1.93 Billion | ▼ -55.6% |
| 2016 | 0.28x | $402.00 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2015 | 0.26x | $374.80 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $307.00 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2013 | 0.24x | $432.40 Million | $1.83 Billion | ▼ -24.6% |
| 2012 | 0.31x | $626.10 Million | $2.00 Billion | ▲ +241.9% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $211.70 Million | $2.31 Billion | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | $312.70 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▼ -41.6% |
| 2009 | 0.24x | $576.85 Million | $2.41 Billion | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2008 | 0.20x | $569.38 Million | $2.90 Billion | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $336.67 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2006 | 0.13x | $336.93 Million | $2.56 Billion | ▲ +3.3% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $318.70 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▲ +145.4% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $139.07 Million | $2.67 Billion | ▼ -33.2% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $202.63 Million | $2.60 Billion | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $206.10 Million | $2.14 Billion | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $179.87 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▲ +4.6% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | $153.11 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▼ -50.6% |
| 1999 | 0.20x | $277.40 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -5.1% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $291.90 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -13.1% |
| 1997 | 0.24x | $312.00 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▲ +48.6% |
| 1996 | 0.16x | $186.40 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1995 | 0.20x | $224.00 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +55.6% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $146.70 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▼ -6.4% |
| 1993 | 0.14x | $153.70 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -9.2% |
| 1992 | 0.15x | $115.50 Million | $753.40 Million | ▼ -20.8% |
| 1991 | 0.19x | $143.30 Million | $740.10 Million | ▼ -22.3% |
| 1990 | 0.25x | $184.50 Million | $740.20 Million | ▼ -24.3% |
| 1989 | 0.33x | $165.10 Million | $501.20 Million | — |