Timken Company (TKR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Timken Company (TKR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $39.30 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.51 Billion) in one year. See TKR FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Timken Company Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Timken Company across 37 annual periods. Also explore Timken Company net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Timken Company (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Timken Company. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TKR company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | $554.30 Million | $3.33 Billion | ▲ +19.9% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $475.70 Million | $3.43 Billion | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $545.20 Million | $3.84 Billion | ▲ +4.7% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $463.80 Million | $3.42 Billion | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2021 | 0.14x | $387.30 Million | $2.79 Billion | ▼ -32.4% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | $577.60 Million | $2.82 Billion | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | $550.10 Million | $2.91 Billion | ▲ +59.6% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $332.50 Million | $2.80 Billion | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | $236.80 Million | $1.93 Billion | ▼ -55.6% |
| 2016 | 0.28x | $402.00 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2015 | 0.26x | $374.80 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▲ +19.8% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $307.00 Million | $1.41 Billion | ▼ -8.0% |
| 2013 | 0.24x | $432.40 Million | $1.83 Billion | ▼ -24.6% |
| 2012 | 0.31x | $626.10 Million | $2.00 Billion | ▲ +241.9% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $211.70 Million | $2.31 Billion | ▼ -34.4% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | $312.70 Million | $2.24 Billion | ▼ -41.6% |
| 2009 | 0.24x | $576.85 Million | $2.41 Billion | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2008 | 0.20x | $569.38 Million | $2.90 Billion | ▲ +41.3% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | $336.67 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2006 | 0.13x | $336.93 Million | $2.56 Billion | ▲ +3.3% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | $318.70 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▲ +145.4% |
| 2004 | 0.05x | $139.07 Million | $2.67 Billion | ▼ -33.2% |
| 2003 | 0.08x | $202.63 Million | $2.60 Billion | ▼ -19.1% |
| 2002 | 0.10x | $206.10 Million | $2.14 Billion | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | $179.87 Million | $1.75 Billion | ▲ +4.6% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | $153.11 Million | $1.56 Billion | ▼ -50.6% |
| 1999 | 0.20x | $277.40 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -5.1% |
| 1998 | 0.21x | $291.90 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -13.1% |
| 1997 | 0.24x | $312.00 Million | $1.29 Billion | ▲ +48.6% |
| 1996 | 0.16x | $186.40 Million | $1.15 Billion | ▼ -20.0% |
| 1995 | 0.20x | $224.00 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▲ +55.6% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $146.70 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▼ -6.4% |
| 1993 | 0.14x | $153.70 Million | $1.10 Billion | ▼ -9.2% |
| 1992 | 0.15x | $115.50 Million | $753.40 Million | ▼ -20.8% |
| 1991 | 0.19x | $143.30 Million | $740.10 Million | ▼ -22.3% |
| 1990 | 0.25x | $184.50 Million | $740.20 Million | ▼ -24.3% |
| 1989 | 0.33x | $165.10 Million | $501.20 Million | — |