Toro Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Toro Co cash flow-to-debt ratio. Toro Co (TTC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $26.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.28 Billion) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Toro Co to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Toro Co (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Toro Co from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Toro Co across 37 annual periods. Check Toro Co (TTC) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Toro Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Toro Co cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Toro Co. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Toro Co operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.33x | $662.00 Million | $1.99 Billion | ▲ +18.8% |
| 2024 | 0.28x | $569.90 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▲ +95.1% |
| 2023 | 0.14x | $306.80 Million | $2.13 Billion | ▲ +6.7% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $297.17 Million | $2.20 Billion | ▼ -56.7% |
| 2021 | 0.31x | $555.47 Million | $1.79 Billion | ▲ +0.3% |
| 2020 | 0.31x | $539.37 Million | $1.74 Billion | ▲ +35.3% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $337.37 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2018 | 0.40x | $364.81 Million | $902.07 Million | ▼ -1.7% |
| 2017 | 0.41x | $360.75 Million | $876.70 Million | ▼ -10.6% |
| 2016 | 0.46x | $384.29 Million | $834.54 Million | ▲ +55.2% |
| 2015 | 0.30x | $249.59 Million | $841.49 Million | ▲ +27.5% |
| 2014 | 0.23x | $182.37 Million | $783.69 Million | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2013 | 0.34x | $221.88 Million | $644.01 Million | ▲ +15.5% |
| 2012 | 0.30x | $185.80 Million | $622.80 Million | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2011 | 0.19x | $113.88 Million | $603.90 Million | ▼ -40.7% |
| 2010 | 0.32x | $193.51 Million | $608.97 Million | ▼ -29.6% |
| 2009 | 0.45x | $251.47 Million | $557.47 Million | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2008 | 0.38x | $215.72 Million | $567.59 Million | ▲ +20.2% |
| 2007 | 0.32x | $183.57 Million | $580.40 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2006 | 0.36x | $190.27 Million | $529.95 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2005 | 0.33x | $174.08 Million | $526.70 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2004 | 0.35x | $185.15 Million | $533.13 Million | ▲ +43.5% |
| 2003 | 0.24x | $118.63 Million | $490.23 Million | ▼ -20.0% |
| 2002 | 0.30x | $145.51 Million | $480.85 Million | ▲ +113.1% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | $70.19 Million | $494.28 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 2000 | 0.23x | $105.55 Million | $462.17 Million | ▲ +88.2% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $61.60 Million | $507.50 Million | ▼ -19.1% |
| 1998 | 0.15x | $69.10 Million | $460.60 Million | ▼ -24.8% |
| 1997 | 0.20x | $83.90 Million | $420.40 Million | ▲ +74.5% |
| 1996 | 0.11x | $32.40 Million | $283.30 Million | ▲ +108.7% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $15.50 Million | $282.80 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 1994 | 0.10x | $27.80 Million | $274.90 Million | ▼ -60.8% |
| 1993 | 0.26x | $70.90 Million | $274.60 Million | ▲ +86.8% |
| 1992 | 0.14x | $39.90 Million | $288.70 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 1991 | 0.17x | $43.90 Million | $254.70 Million | ▲ +11777.4% |
| 1990 | 0.00x | $-400.00K | $271.00 Million | ▼ -101.9% |
| 1989 | 0.08x | $17.70 Million | $222.50 Million | — |