United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.75x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-12.06 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($16.15 Million) in one year. See United States Antimony Corporation leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
United States Antimony Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for United States Antimony Corporation across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see United States Antimony Corporation cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for United States Antimony Corporation (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for United States Antimony Corporation. Check UAMY cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.75x | $-9.69 Million | $12.97 Million | ▼ -303.3% |
| 2024 | 0.37x | $2.22 Million | $6.04 Million | ▲ +119.9% |
| 2023 | -1.85x | $-4.75 Million | $2.57 Million | ▼ -1995.9% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-249.28K | $2.83 Million | ▲ +90.5% |
| 2021 | -0.92x | $-2.43 Million | $2.63 Million | ▼ -332.2% |
| 2020 | -0.21x | $-1.31 Million | $6.11 Million | ▼ -9731.5% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | $-11.36K | $5.23 Million | ▲ +98.0% |
| 2018 | -0.11x | $-656.63K | $6.13 Million | ▼ -200.9% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $716.71K | $6.75 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $425.84K | $6.42 Million | ▲ +7.3% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $358.45K | $5.80 Million | ▲ +121.2% |
| 2014 | -0.29x | $-1.04 Million | $3.55 Million | ▼ -583.6% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $234.82K | $3.89 Million | ▼ -64.5% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $526.42K | $3.10 Million | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | $564.04K | $2.23 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2010 | 0.32x | $307.35K | $974.23K | ▲ +192.9% |
| 2009 | -0.34x | $-358.19K | $1.05 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2008 | -0.25x | $-378.58K | $1.49 Million | ▼ -91.8% |
| 2007 | -0.13x | $-347.30K | $2.62 Million | ▼ -319.0% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $137.46K | $2.27 Million | ▲ +146.8% |
| 2005 | -0.13x | $-302.53K | $2.34 Million | ▲ +35.3% |
| 2004 | -0.20x | $-426.04K | $2.13 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2003 | -0.17x | $-449.46K | $2.70 Million | ▼ -768.2% |
| 2002 | -0.02x | $-44.49K | $2.32 Million | ▲ +85.5% |
| 2001 | -0.13x | $-251.41K | $1.89 Million | ▲ +56.3% |
| 2000 | -0.30x | $-791.09K | $2.60 Million | ▼ -1697.4% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $59.99K | $3.15 Million | ▲ +332.2% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | $16.60K | $3.77 Million | ▼ -60.5% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $40.41K | $3.63 Million | ▲ +127.1% |
| 1996 | -0.04x | $-211.49K | $5.14 Million | — |