United States Antimony Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
United States Antimony Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.75x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-12.06 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($16.15 Million) in one year. Check UAMY cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of United States Antimony Corporation (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of United States Antimony Corporation from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for United States Antimony Corporation across 30 annual periods. Check United States Antimony Corporation investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
United States Antimony Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
United States Antimony Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for United States Antimony Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see United States Antimony Corporation operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.75x | $-9.69 Million | $12.97 Million | ▼ -303.3% |
| 2024 | 0.37x | $2.22 Million | $6.04 Million | ▲ +119.9% |
| 2023 | -1.85x | $-4.75 Million | $2.57 Million | ▼ -1995.9% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-249.28K | $2.83 Million | ▲ +90.5% |
| 2021 | -0.92x | $-2.43 Million | $2.63 Million | ▼ -332.2% |
| 2020 | -0.21x | $-1.31 Million | $6.11 Million | ▼ -9731.5% |
| 2019 | 0.00x | $-11.36K | $5.23 Million | ▲ +98.0% |
| 2018 | -0.11x | $-656.63K | $6.13 Million | ▼ -200.9% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $716.71K | $6.75 Million | ▲ +60.1% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | $425.84K | $6.42 Million | ▲ +7.3% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $358.45K | $5.80 Million | ▲ +121.2% |
| 2014 | -0.29x | $-1.04 Million | $3.55 Million | ▼ -583.6% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $234.82K | $3.89 Million | ▼ -64.5% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $526.42K | $3.10 Million | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | $564.04K | $2.23 Million | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2010 | 0.32x | $307.35K | $974.23K | ▲ +192.9% |
| 2009 | -0.34x | $-358.19K | $1.05 Million | ▼ -33.5% |
| 2008 | -0.25x | $-378.58K | $1.49 Million | ▼ -91.8% |
| 2007 | -0.13x | $-347.30K | $2.62 Million | ▼ -319.0% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | $137.46K | $2.27 Million | ▲ +146.8% |
| 2005 | -0.13x | $-302.53K | $2.34 Million | ▲ +35.3% |
| 2004 | -0.20x | $-426.04K | $2.13 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2003 | -0.17x | $-449.46K | $2.70 Million | ▼ -768.2% |
| 2002 | -0.02x | $-44.49K | $2.32 Million | ▲ +85.5% |
| 2001 | -0.13x | $-251.41K | $1.89 Million | ▲ +56.3% |
| 2000 | -0.30x | $-791.09K | $2.60 Million | ▼ -1697.4% |
| 1999 | 0.02x | $59.99K | $3.15 Million | ▲ +332.2% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | $16.60K | $3.77 Million | ▼ -60.5% |
| 1997 | 0.01x | $40.41K | $3.63 Million | ▲ +127.1% |
| 1996 | -0.04x | $-211.49K | $5.14 Million | — |