Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $11.95 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($415.96 Million) in one year. Explore Universal Health Realty Income Trust long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Universal Health Realty Income Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Universal Health Realty Income Trust across 37 annual periods. Also explore UHT total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Universal Health Realty Income Trust (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Universal Health Realty Income Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Universal Health Realty Income Trust.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $49.09 Million | $412.52 Million | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $46.91 Million | $401.32 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $43.47 Million | $395.44 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $46.80 Million | $378.44 Million | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $47.73 Million | $363.09 Million | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $44.21 Million | $335.00 Million | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $42.65 Million | $307.06 Million | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $42.93 Million | $285.15 Million | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $46.01 Million | $279.45 Million | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $40.73 Million | $333.47 Million | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $38.18 Million | $263.86 Million | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $32.80 Million | $224.28 Million | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $31.29 Million | $207.51 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $30.78 Million | $205.29 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $21.37 Million | $181.98 Million | ▼ -64.0% |
| 2010 | 0.33x | $23.05 Million | $70.62 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2009 | 0.29x | $24.98 Million | $87.64 Million | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2008 | 0.29x | $21.84 Million | $75.96 Million | ▼ -50.4% |
| 2007 | 0.58x | $22.77 Million | $39.27 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2006 | 0.83x | $24.70 Million | $29.80 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2005 | 0.62x | $25.30 Million | $41.14 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2004 | 0.54x | $26.99 Million | $50.29 Million | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2003 | 0.69x | $29.08 Million | $42.09 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2002 | 0.73x | $26.29 Million | $36.22 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2001 | 0.60x | $22.78 Million | $37.83 Million | ▲ +154.3% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | $19.97 Million | $84.34 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $19.58 Million | $79.07 Million | ▼ -9.8% |
| 1998 | 0.27x | $18.66 Million | $67.97 Million | ▼ -31.9% |
| 1997 | 0.40x | $17.71 Million | $43.96 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 1996 | 0.40x | $18.00 Million | $44.58 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 1995 | 0.61x | $17.07 Million | $27.77 Million | ▼ -24.1% |
| 1994 | 0.81x | $18.20 Million | $22.46 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 1993 | 0.75x | $14.70 Million | $19.70 Million | ▲ +173.6% |
| 1992 | 0.27x | $13.80 Million | $50.60 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 1991 | 0.30x | $14.20 Million | $46.90 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 1990 | 0.25x | $12.90 Million | $52.00 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 1989 | 0.22x | $11.70 Million | $54.00 Million | — |