Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $10.20 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($409.46 Million) in one year. See Universal Health Realty Income Trust free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Universal Health Realty Income Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Universal Health Realty Income Trust across 36 annual periods. Also explore Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Universal Health Realty Income Trust (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Universal Health Realty Income Trust. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Universal Health Realty Income Trust stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.12x | $46.91 Million | $401.32 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $43.47 Million | $395.44 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $46.80 Million | $378.44 Million | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $47.73 Million | $363.09 Million | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $44.21 Million | $335.00 Million | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $42.65 Million | $307.06 Million | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $42.93 Million | $285.15 Million | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $46.01 Million | $279.45 Million | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $40.73 Million | $333.47 Million | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $38.18 Million | $263.86 Million | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $32.80 Million | $224.28 Million | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $31.29 Million | $207.51 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $30.78 Million | $205.29 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $21.37 Million | $181.98 Million | ▼ -64.0% |
| 2010 | 0.33x | $23.05 Million | $70.62 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2009 | 0.29x | $24.98 Million | $87.64 Million | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2008 | 0.29x | $21.84 Million | $75.96 Million | ▼ -50.4% |
| 2007 | 0.58x | $22.77 Million | $39.27 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2006 | 0.83x | $24.70 Million | $29.80 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2005 | 0.62x | $25.30 Million | $41.14 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2004 | 0.54x | $26.99 Million | $50.29 Million | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2003 | 0.69x | $29.08 Million | $42.09 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2002 | 0.73x | $26.29 Million | $36.22 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2001 | 0.60x | $22.78 Million | $37.83 Million | ▲ +154.3% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | $19.97 Million | $84.34 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $19.58 Million | $79.07 Million | ▼ -9.8% |
| 1998 | 0.27x | $18.66 Million | $67.97 Million | ▼ -31.9% |
| 1997 | 0.40x | $17.71 Million | $43.96 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 1996 | 0.40x | $18.00 Million | $44.58 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 1995 | 0.61x | $17.07 Million | $27.77 Million | ▼ -24.1% |
| 1994 | 0.81x | $18.20 Million | $22.46 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 1993 | 0.75x | $14.70 Million | $19.70 Million | ▲ +173.6% |
| 1992 | 0.27x | $13.80 Million | $50.60 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 1991 | 0.30x | $14.20 Million | $46.90 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 1990 | 0.25x | $12.90 Million | $52.00 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 1989 | 0.22x | $11.70 Million | $54.00 Million | — |