Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $12.40 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($423.21 Million) in one year. See Universal Health Realty Income Trust free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Universal Health Realty Income Trust Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Universal Health Realty Income Trust across 37 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Universal Health Realty Income Trust cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Universal Health Realty Income Trust (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Universal Health Realty Income Trust. Check Universal Health Realty Income Trust earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.12x | $49.09 Million | $412.52 Million | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2024 | 0.12x | $46.91 Million | $401.32 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2023 | 0.11x | $43.47 Million | $395.44 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2022 | 0.12x | $46.80 Million | $378.44 Million | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $47.73 Million | $363.09 Million | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $44.21 Million | $335.00 Million | ▼ -5.0% |
| 2019 | 0.14x | $42.65 Million | $307.06 Million | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2018 | 0.15x | $42.93 Million | $285.15 Million | ▼ -8.6% |
| 2017 | 0.16x | $46.01 Million | $279.45 Million | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $40.73 Million | $333.47 Million | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2015 | 0.14x | $38.18 Million | $263.86 Million | ▼ -1.0% |
| 2014 | 0.15x | $32.80 Million | $224.28 Million | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $31.29 Million | $207.51 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $30.78 Million | $205.29 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | $21.37 Million | $181.98 Million | ▼ -64.0% |
| 2010 | 0.33x | $23.05 Million | $70.62 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2009 | 0.29x | $24.98 Million | $87.64 Million | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2008 | 0.29x | $21.84 Million | $75.96 Million | ▼ -50.4% |
| 2007 | 0.58x | $22.77 Million | $39.27 Million | ▼ -30.0% |
| 2006 | 0.83x | $24.70 Million | $29.80 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2005 | 0.62x | $25.30 Million | $41.14 Million | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2004 | 0.54x | $26.99 Million | $50.29 Million | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2003 | 0.69x | $29.08 Million | $42.09 Million | ▼ -4.8% |
| 2002 | 0.73x | $26.29 Million | $36.22 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2001 | 0.60x | $22.78 Million | $37.83 Million | ▲ +154.3% |
| 2000 | 0.24x | $19.97 Million | $84.34 Million | ▼ -4.4% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $19.58 Million | $79.07 Million | ▼ -9.8% |
| 1998 | 0.27x | $18.66 Million | $67.97 Million | ▼ -31.9% |
| 1997 | 0.40x | $17.71 Million | $43.96 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 1996 | 0.40x | $18.00 Million | $44.58 Million | ▼ -34.3% |
| 1995 | 0.61x | $17.07 Million | $27.77 Million | ▼ -24.1% |
| 1994 | 0.81x | $18.20 Million | $22.46 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 1993 | 0.75x | $14.70 Million | $19.70 Million | ▲ +173.6% |
| 1992 | 0.27x | $13.80 Million | $50.60 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 1991 | 0.30x | $14.20 Million | $46.90 Million | ▲ +22.0% |
| 1990 | 0.25x | $12.90 Million | $52.00 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 1989 | 0.22x | $11.70 Million | $54.00 Million | — |