WESCO International Inc (WCC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
WESCO International Inc (WCC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $221.40 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($11.87 Billion) in one year. See cash generation quality of WESCO International Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
WESCO International Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for WESCO International Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore WCC net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for WESCO International Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for WESCO International Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see WESCO International Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.01x | $125.00 Million | $11.47 Billion | ▼ -90.0% |
| 2024 | 0.11x | $1.10 Billion | $10.10 Billion | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $1.02 Billion | $10.03 Billion | ▲ +9456.2% |
| 2022 | 0.00x | $11.04 Million | $10.36 Billion | ▼ -86.0% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $67.14 Million | $8.84 Billion | ▼ -88.1% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $543.93 Million | $8.54 Billion | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | $224.37 Million | $2.76 Billion | ▼ -32.3% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $296.70 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▲ +111.1% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | $149.10 Million | $2.62 Billion | ▼ -53.0% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $300.20 Million | $2.48 Billion | ▲ +19.5% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $283.10 Million | $2.80 Billion | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $251.10 Million | $2.83 Billion | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2013 | 0.11x | $315.10 Million | $2.85 Billion | ▲ +17.9% |
| 2012 | 0.09x | $288.20 Million | $3.08 Billion | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | $167.50 Million | $1.73 Billion | ▲ +27.4% |
| 2010 | 0.08x | $127.30 Million | $1.68 Billion | ▼ -61.0% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $291.60 Million | $1.50 Billion | ▲ +36.7% |
| 2008 | 0.14x | $279.86 Million | $1.96 Billion | ▲ +22.3% |
| 2007 | 0.12x | $262.28 Million | $2.25 Billion | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $207.08 Million | $2.06 Billion | ▼ -60.5% |
| 2005 | 0.25x | $295.10 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▲ +1063.4% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $21.94 Million | $1.00 Billion | ▼ -39.2% |
| 2003 | 0.04x | $35.76 Million | $993.52 Million | ▲ +49.8% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | $20.43 Million | $850.23 Million | ▼ -84.9% |
| 2001 | 0.16x | $161.09 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▲ +251.2% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | $46.91 Million | $1.04 Billion | ▼ -37.9% |
| 1999 | 0.07x | $66.40 Million | $911.50 Million | ▼ -71.8% |
| 1998 | 0.26x | $276.90 Million | $1.07 Billion | — |