Westlake Chemical Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Westlake Chemical Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Westlake Chemical Corporation (WLK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $318.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.23 Billion) in one year. Check Westlake Chemical Corporation (WLK) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Westlake Chemical Corporation (2002–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Westlake Chemical Corporation from 2002 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Westlake Chemical Corporation across 24 annual periods. Check WLK cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Westlake Chemical Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2002–2025)
Westlake Chemical Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2002 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Westlake Chemical Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Westlake Chemical Corporation (WLK) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.04x | $465.00 Million | $10.67 Billion | ▼ -67.8% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | $1.31 Billion | $9.71 Billion | ▼ -40.5% |
| 2023 | 0.23x | $2.34 Billion | $10.27 Billion | ▼ -32.4% |
| 2022 | 0.34x | $3.40 Billion | $10.09 Billion | ▲ +39.6% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | $2.39 Billion | $9.93 Billion | ▲ +34.9% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $1.30 Billion | $7.26 Billion | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | $1.30 Billion | $6.86 Billion | ▼ -25.6% |
| 2018 | 0.25x | $1.41 Billion | $5.53 Billion | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2017 | 0.23x | $1.54 Billion | $6.71 Billion | ▲ +92.5% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $833.85 Million | $7.00 Billion | ▼ -77.8% |
| 2015 | 0.54x | $1.08 Billion | $2.01 Billion | ▲ +4.4% |
| 2014 | 0.51x | $1.03 Billion | $2.01 Billion | ▲ +11.9% |
| 2013 | 0.46x | $752.73 Million | $1.64 Billion | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2012 | 0.41x | $624.05 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▲ +69.0% |
| 2011 | 0.24x | $362.30 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▲ +22.7% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $283.28 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2009 | 0.20x | $235.52 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▲ +14.2% |
| 2008 | 0.18x | $186.09 Million | $1.05 Billion | ▲ +266.4% |
| 2007 | 0.05x | $62.17 Million | $1.28 Billion | ▼ -81.4% |
| 2006 | 0.26x | $237.18 Million | $908.56 Million | ▼ -31.7% |
| 2005 | 0.38x | $318.45 Million | $833.08 Million | ▲ +108.7% |
| 2004 | 0.18x | $150.78 Million | $823.06 Million | ▲ +111.7% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $78.09 Million | $902.41 Million | ▲ +448.4% |
| 2002 | -0.02x | $-21.33 Million | $858.63 Million | — |