Westlake Chemical Corporation Tangible Net Worth Ratio
Westlake Chemical Corporation tangible net worth ratio. Westlake Chemical Corporation (WLK) has a Tangible Net Worth Ratio of 87.1% as of June 2026. This metric is calculated by deducting intangible assets ($1.19 Billion) from net assets ($9.21 Billion) and expressing it as a percentage of total net assets. A higher ratio means that more of the company's equity is backed by tangible, balance-sheet-verifiable assets rather than goodwill, patents, or brand value. Also explore Westlake Chemical Corporation net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Tangible NW Ratio
Net Assets (Equity)
Intangible Assets
Total Assets
Tangible Net Worth Ratio of Westlake Chemical Corporation (2002–2025)
Tangible net worth ratio of Westlake Chemical Corporation from 2002 to 2025. This chart shows how Westlake Chemical Corporation's Tangible Net Worth Ratio has changed across 24 annual periods from 2002 to 2025. As of June 2026, the ratio stands at 87.1%, reflecting net assets of $9.21 Billion with intangible assets of $1.19 Billion USD. Check WLK strategic asset allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Westlake Chemical Corporation Tangible Net Worth Ratio by Year (2002–2025)
Westlake Chemical Corporation tangible net worth ratio by year from 2002 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Tangible Net Worth Ratio for Westlake Chemical Corporation from 2002 to 2025, covering 24 annual filings. Each row shows net assets, intangible assets, total assets, the tangible net worth ratio, and the change in percentage points versus the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see market cap of Westlake Chemical Corporation.
| Year | Tangible NW Ratio | Net Assets (USD) | Intangible Assets | Total Assets | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 87.3% | $9.29 Billion | $1.18 Billion | $19.96 Billion | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2024 | 88.4% | $11.04 Billion | $1.28 Billion | $20.75 Billion | ▲ +1.4 pp |
| 2023 | 87.0% | $10.76 Billion | $1.40 Billion | $21.04 Billion | ▲ +1.9 pp |
| 2022 | 85.0% | $10.46 Billion | $1.56 Billion | $20.55 Billion | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2021 | 81.5% | $8.53 Billion | $1.58 Billion | $18.46 Billion | ▼ -9.2 pp |
| 2020 | 90.7% | $6.58 Billion | $612.00 Million | $13.84 Billion | ▲ +1.8 pp |
| 2019 | 88.9% | $6.40 Billion | $710.00 Million | $13.26 Billion | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2018 | 89.2% | $6.08 Billion | $659.00 Million | $11.60 Billion | ▲ +3.6 pp |
| 2017 | 85.5% | $5.37 Billion | $777.00 Million | $12.08 Billion | ▲ +5.8 pp |
| 2016 | 79.8% | $3.89 Billion | $787.45 Million | $10.89 Billion | ▼ -16.0 pp |
| 2015 | 95.7% | $3.56 Billion | $151.39 Million | $5.58 Billion | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2014 | 95.1% | $3.20 Billion | $156.41 Million | $5.21 Billion | ▼ -0.9 pp |
| 2013 | 96.0% | $2.42 Billion | $97.03 Million | $4.06 Billion | ▼ -3.0 pp |
| 2012 | 99.0% | $1.87 Billion | $18.30 Million | $3.41 Billion | ▲ +0.1 pp |
| 2011 | 98.9% | $1.76 Billion | $19.07 Million | $3.27 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2010 | 98.5% | $1.51 Billion | $22.11 Million | $2.95 Billion | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2009 | 97.9% | $1.28 Billion | $26.55 Million | $2.45 Billion | ▲ +0.4 pp |
| 2008 | 97.5% | $1.24 Billion | $31.16 Million | $2.29 Billion | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2007 | 97.3% | $1.29 Billion | $34.69 Million | $2.57 Billion | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2006 | 96.7% | $1.17 Billion | $38.97 Million | $2.08 Billion | ▼ -1.6 pp |
| 2005 | 98.3% | $994.11 Million | $17.06 Million | $1.83 Billion | ▲ +0.6 pp |
| 2004 | 97.7% | $769.40 Million | $17.90 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -2.3 pp |
| 2003 | 100.0% | $467.70 Million | $0.00 | $1.37 Billion | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2002 | 100.0% | $450.62 Million | $0.00 | $1.31 Billion | — |