Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $101.30 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.09 Billion) in one year. See Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation free cash flow to debt ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ZWS cash generation efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation. Check cash flow quality index of Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.28x | $293.50 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2023 | 0.24x | $253.90 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +207.2% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $97.00 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | $223.60 Million | $951.30 Million | ▲ +134.9% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $196.30 Million | $1.96 Billion | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $258.10 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $258.10 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $228.50 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $195.10 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $219.00 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $245.90 Million | $2.86 Billion | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $190.80 Million | $2.82 Billion | ▲ +42.5% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $144.50 Million | $3.05 Billion | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $139.30 Million | $3.37 Billion | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $164.50 Million | $3.19 Billion | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $155.50 Million | $3.07 Billion | ▼ -75.9% |
| 1999 | 0.21x | $989.00K | $4.71 Million | ▲ +160.9% |
| 1998 | -0.34x | $-2.00 Million | $5.80 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 1997 | -0.35x | $-1.40 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +14.4% |
| 1996 | -0.41x | $-900.00K | $2.20 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 1995 | -0.55x | $-1.70 Million | $3.10 Million | ▼ -397.0% |
| 1994 | -0.11x | $-1.60 Million | $14.50 Million | ▼ -148.7% |
| 1993 | 0.23x | $2.90 Million | $12.80 Million | ▲ +1633.2% |
| 1992 | 0.01x | $200.00K | $15.30 Million | ▼ -90.3% |
| 1991 | 0.13x | $2.40 Million | $17.90 Million | ▲ +2876.5% |
| 1990 | 0.00x | $100.00K | $22.20 Million | ▼ -92.9% |
| 1989 | 0.06x | $1.40 Million | $22.10 Million | — |