Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $101.30 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.09 Billion) in one year. Check ZWS capex plus investments ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation across 27 annual periods. Also explore ZWS total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.28x | $293.50 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2023 | 0.24x | $253.90 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +207.2% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $97.00 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | $223.60 Million | $951.30 Million | ▲ +134.9% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $196.30 Million | $1.96 Billion | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $258.10 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $258.10 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $228.50 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $195.10 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $219.00 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $245.90 Million | $2.86 Billion | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $190.80 Million | $2.82 Billion | ▲ +42.5% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $144.50 Million | $3.05 Billion | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $139.30 Million | $3.37 Billion | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $164.50 Million | $3.19 Billion | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $155.50 Million | $3.07 Billion | ▼ -75.9% |
| 1999 | 0.21x | $989.00K | $4.71 Million | ▲ +160.9% |
| 1998 | -0.34x | $-2.00 Million | $5.80 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 1997 | -0.35x | $-1.40 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +14.4% |
| 1996 | -0.41x | $-900.00K | $2.20 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 1995 | -0.55x | $-1.70 Million | $3.10 Million | ▼ -397.0% |
| 1994 | -0.11x | $-1.60 Million | $14.50 Million | ▼ -148.7% |
| 1993 | 0.23x | $2.90 Million | $12.80 Million | ▲ +1633.2% |
| 1992 | 0.01x | $200.00K | $15.30 Million | ▼ -90.3% |
| 1991 | 0.13x | $2.40 Million | $17.90 Million | ▲ +2876.5% |
| 1990 | 0.00x | $100.00K | $22.20 Million | ▼ -92.9% |
| 1989 | 0.06x | $1.40 Million | $22.10 Million | — |