Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $101.30 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.09 Billion) in one year. See ZWS cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation across 27 annual periods. Also explore ZWS net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (1989–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.28x | $293.50 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2023 | 0.24x | $253.90 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +207.2% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $97.00 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | $223.60 Million | $951.30 Million | ▲ +134.9% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $196.30 Million | $1.96 Billion | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $258.10 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $258.10 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $228.50 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $195.10 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $219.00 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $245.90 Million | $2.86 Billion | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $190.80 Million | $2.82 Billion | ▲ +42.5% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $144.50 Million | $3.05 Billion | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $139.30 Million | $3.37 Billion | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $164.50 Million | $3.19 Billion | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $155.50 Million | $3.07 Billion | ▼ -75.9% |
| 1999 | 0.21x | $989.00K | $4.71 Million | ▲ +160.9% |
| 1998 | -0.34x | $-2.00 Million | $5.80 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 1997 | -0.35x | $-1.40 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +14.4% |
| 1996 | -0.41x | $-900.00K | $2.20 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 1995 | -0.55x | $-1.70 Million | $3.10 Million | ▼ -397.0% |
| 1994 | -0.11x | $-1.60 Million | $14.50 Million | ▼ -148.7% |
| 1993 | 0.23x | $2.90 Million | $12.80 Million | ▲ +1633.2% |
| 1992 | 0.01x | $200.00K | $15.30 Million | ▼ -90.3% |
| 1991 | 0.13x | $2.40 Million | $17.90 Million | ▲ +2876.5% |
| 1990 | 0.00x | $100.00K | $22.20 Million | ▼ -92.9% |
| 1989 | 0.06x | $1.40 Million | $22.10 Million | — |