Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $101.30 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.09 Billion) in one year. Check ZWS cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (1989–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation from 1989 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation across 27 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2024)
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.28x | $293.50 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2023 | 0.24x | $253.90 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +207.2% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $97.00 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▼ -67.0% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | $223.60 Million | $951.30 Million | ▲ +134.9% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $196.30 Million | $1.96 Billion | ▼ -21.4% |
| 2019 | 0.13x | $258.10 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $258.10 Million | $2.03 Billion | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $228.50 Million | $2.21 Billion | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2016 | 0.08x | $195.10 Million | $2.47 Billion | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2015 | 0.08x | $219.00 Million | $2.77 Billion | ▼ -7.9% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $245.90 Million | $2.86 Billion | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2013 | 0.07x | $190.80 Million | $2.82 Billion | ▲ +42.5% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $144.50 Million | $3.05 Billion | ▲ +14.9% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $139.30 Million | $3.37 Billion | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2010 | 0.05x | $164.50 Million | $3.19 Billion | ▲ +2.0% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | $155.50 Million | $3.07 Billion | ▼ -75.9% |
| 1999 | 0.21x | $989.00K | $4.71 Million | ▲ +160.9% |
| 1998 | -0.34x | $-2.00 Million | $5.80 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 1997 | -0.35x | $-1.40 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +14.4% |
| 1996 | -0.41x | $-900.00K | $2.20 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 1995 | -0.55x | $-1.70 Million | $3.10 Million | ▼ -397.0% |
| 1994 | -0.11x | $-1.60 Million | $14.50 Million | ▼ -148.7% |
| 1993 | 0.23x | $2.90 Million | $12.80 Million | ▲ +1633.2% |
| 1992 | 0.01x | $200.00K | $15.30 Million | ▼ -90.3% |
| 1991 | 0.13x | $2.40 Million | $17.90 Million | ▲ +2876.5% |
| 1990 | 0.00x | $100.00K | $22.20 Million | ▼ -92.9% |
| 1989 | 0.06x | $1.40 Million | $22.10 Million | — |