Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation working capital to net assets ratio. Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (ZWS) has a Working Capital to Net Assets ratio of 32.2% as of September 2025. Working capital of $512.50 Million (current assets of $800.70 Million minus current liabilities of $288.20 Million) is measured against net assets of $1.59 Billion. A higher ratio indicates strong short-term liquidity financed by the equity base. Check ZWS intangible-adjusted equity ratio to evaluate the tangible quality of the company's equity base.
WC/NA Ratio
Working Capital
Current Assets
Current Liabilities
Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio of Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation (1985–2024)
Working capital to net assets ratio of Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation from 1985 to 2024. This chart shows how Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation's Working Capital to Net Assets ratio has evolved across 31 annual periods from 1985 to 2024. As of September 2025, the ratio stands at 32.2%, reflecting working capital of $512.50 Million against net assets of $1.59 Billion USD. See Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation liquidity coverage in days to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation Working Capital to Net Assets Ratio by Year (1985–2024)
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation working capital to net assets ratio by year from 1985 to 2024. The table below presents the year-by-year Working Capital to Net Assets ratio for Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corporation from 1985 to 2024, covering 31 annual filings. Each row shows current assets, current liabilities, working capital, net assets, the ratio, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For the complete balance sheet picture, see ZWS total asset value.
| Year | WC/NA Ratio | Working Capital (USD) | Net Assets | Current Assets | Current Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 29.9% | $474.30 Million | $1.59 Billion | $722.10 Million | $247.80 Million | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2023 | 27.9% | $446.90 Million | $1.60 Billion | $667.80 Million | $220.90 Million | ▼ -1.1 pp |
| 2022 | 29.0% | $468.20 Million | $1.61 Billion | $757.50 Million | $289.30 Million | ▼ -156.5 pp |
| 2021 | 185.4% | $234.40 Million | $126.40 Million | $474.80 Million | $240.40 Million | ▲ +144.4 pp |
| 2020 | 41.0% | $590.20 Million | $1.44 Billion | $907.70 Million | $317.50 Million | ▼ -6.6 pp |
| 2019 | 47.6% | $585.90 Million | $1.23 Billion | $982.90 Million | $397.00 Million | ▲ +0.0 pp |
| 2018 | 47.6% | $585.90 Million | $1.23 Billion | $982.90 Million | $397.00 Million | ▲ +2.8 pp |
| 2017 | 44.8% | $543.50 Million | $1.21 Billion | $997.70 Million | $454.20 Million | ▼ -27.8 pp |
| 2016 | 72.7% | $777.80 Million | $1.07 Billion | $1.18 Billion | $400.30 Million | ▼ -58.6 pp |
| 2015 | 131.2% | $771.70 Million | $588.00 Million | $1.18 Billion | $404.40 Million | ▲ +7.9 pp |
| 2014 | 123.3% | $681.70 Million | $552.70 Million | $1.13 Billion | $444.60 Million | ▲ +3.9 pp |
| 2013 | 119.4% | $671.30 Million | $562.10 Million | $1.12 Billion | $449.50 Million | ▼ -29.7 pp |
| 2012 | 149.1% | $638.90 Million | $428.50 Million | $1.25 Billion | $608.20 Million | ▲ +831.0 pp |
| 2011 | -681.9% | $551.00 Million | $-80.80 Million | $1.02 Billion | $467.30 Million | ▼ -133.6 pp |
| 2010 | -548.3% | $483.60 Million | $-88.20 Million | $981.40 Million | $497.80 Million | ▲ +289.8 pp |
| 2009 | -838.1% | $481.90 Million | $-57.50 Million | $801.20 Million | $319.30 Million | ▼ -848.7 pp |
| 1999 | 10.6% | $415.00K | $3.91 Million | $4.52 Million | $4.10 Million | ▼ -11.1 pp |
| 1998 | 21.7% | $1.00 Million | $4.60 Million | $6.00 Million | $5.00 Million | ▼ -7.7 pp |
| 1997 | 29.4% | $1.50 Million | $5.10 Million | $5.20 Million | $3.70 Million | ▼ -72.7 pp |
| 1996 | 102.1% | $4.80 Million | $4.70 Million | $6.90 Million | $2.10 Million | ▲ +2.1 pp |
| 1995 | 100.0% | $6.00 Million | $6.00 Million | $9.10 Million | $3.10 Million | ▲ +23.3 pp |
| 1994 | 76.7% | $9.90 Million | $12.90 Million | $22.80 Million | $12.90 Million | ▼ -0.4 pp |
| 1993 | 77.2% | $9.80 Million | $12.70 Million | $20.90 Million | $11.10 Million | ▲ +1.2 pp |
| 1992 | 76.0% | $9.50 Million | $12.50 Million | $23.00 Million | $13.50 Million | ▼ -1.5 pp |
| 1991 | 77.5% | $10.70 Million | $13.80 Million | $26.30 Million | $15.60 Million | ▲ +3.7 pp |
| 1990 | 73.9% | $9.90 Million | $13.40 Million | $29.70 Million | $19.80 Million | ▼ -3.8 pp |
| 1989 | 77.6% | $13.20 Million | $17.00 Million | $32.80 Million | $19.60 Million | ▼ -0.7 pp |
| 1988 | 78.3% | $13.00 Million | $16.60 Million | $29.70 Million | $16.70 Million | ▼ -3.7 pp |
| 1987 | 82.0% | $18.70 Million | $22.80 Million | $31.00 Million | $12.30 Million | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 1986 | 84.0% | $18.40 Million | $21.90 Million | $29.80 Million | $11.40 Million | ▼ -0.6 pp |
| 1985 | 84.6% | $17.00 Million | $20.10 Million | $25.60 Million | $8.60 Million | — |