General Shopping e Outlets do Brasil S.A. (GSHP3) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: -0.02x

General Shopping e Outlets do Brasil S.A. (GSHP3) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of R$-39.84 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (R$2.57 Billion) in one year. See GSHP3 free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.02x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

R$-39.84 Million
BRL

Total Liabilities

R$2.57 Billion
BRL

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

General Shopping e Outlets do Brasil S.A. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2013–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for General Shopping e Outlets do Brasil S.A. across 13 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of General Shopping e Outlets do Brasil S.A to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for General Shopping e Outlets do Brasil S.A. (2013–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for General Shopping e Outlets do Brasil S.A.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see GSHP3 stock market capitalisation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (BRL) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -0.02x R$-39.84 Million R$2.57 Billion ▼ -398.0%
2024 0.00x R$-8.57 Million R$2.75 Billion ▲ +88.9%
2023 -0.03x R$-62.89 Million R$2.25 Billion ▲ +48.6%
2022 -0.05x R$-125.89 Million R$2.31 Billion ▼ -237.1%
2021 -0.02x R$-39.65 Million R$2.45 Billion ▼ -187.0%
2020 0.02x R$40.18 Million R$2.16 Billion ▲ +145.7%
2019 -0.04x R$-68.91 Million R$1.70 Billion ▼ -31.8%
2018 -0.03x R$-90.50 Million R$2.93 Billion ▼ -173.7%
2017 0.04x R$97.77 Million R$2.34 Billion ▼ -16.0%
2016 0.05x R$115.98 Million R$2.33 Billion ▲ +2274.5%
2015 0.00x R$5.15 Million R$2.46 Billion ▲ +105.5%
2014 -0.04x R$-89.97 Million R$2.37 Billion ▼ -153.5%
2013 0.07x R$149.68 Million R$2.11 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.