BECE Legend Group Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
BECE Legend Group Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. BECE Legend Group Co Ltd (000803) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥161.57 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥3.73 Billion) in one year. Check BECE Legend Group Co Ltd (000803) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of BECE Legend Group Co Ltd (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of BECE Legend Group Co Ltd from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for BECE Legend Group Co Ltd across 28 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of BECE Legend Group Co Ltd to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
BECE Legend Group Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
BECE Legend Group Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for BECE Legend Group Co Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see BECE Legend Group Co Ltd (000803) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CNY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.10x | CN¥396.94 Million | CN¥3.83 Billion | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2024 | 0.10x | CN¥373.89 Million | CN¥3.76 Billion | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2023 | 0.19x | CN¥770.35 Million | CN¥3.96 Billion | ▲ +4864.3% |
| 2022 | 0.00x | CN¥-16.77 Million | CN¥4.10 Billion | ▲ +95.0% |
| 2021 | -0.08x | CN¥-118.77 Million | CN¥1.44 Billion | ▲ +2.9% |
| 2020 | -0.08x | CN¥-99.60 Million | CN¥1.17 Billion | ▼ -188.9% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | CN¥45.31 Million | CN¥475.04 Million | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | CN¥97.92 Million | CN¥1.14 Billion | ▲ +330.5% |
| 2017 | -0.04x | CN¥-42.61 Million | CN¥1.15 Billion | ▼ -67.8% |
| 2016 | -0.02x | CN¥-10.28 Million | CN¥464.19 Million | ▲ +74.4% |
| 2015 | -0.09x | CN¥-30.81 Million | CN¥355.77 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2014 | -0.14x | CN¥-44.12 Million | CN¥306.11 Million | ▲ +46.6% |
| 2013 | -0.27x | CN¥-92.70 Million | CN¥343.31 Million | ▼ -276.3% |
| 2012 | -0.07x | CN¥-11.17 Million | CN¥155.64 Million | ▲ +20.2% |
| 2011 | -0.09x | CN¥-13.92 Million | CN¥154.88 Million | ▼ -570.2% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | CN¥1.91 Million | CN¥99.95 Million | ▲ +222.3% |
| 2009 | 0.01x | CN¥584.67K | CN¥98.59 Million | ▲ +109.6% |
| 2008 | -0.06x | CN¥-5.54 Million | CN¥89.47 Million | ▼ -418.2% |
| 2007 | 0.02x | CN¥2.36 Million | CN¥121.08 Million | ▼ -89.2% |
| 2006 | 0.18x | CN¥28.06 Million | CN¥155.30 Million | ▲ +161.5% |
| 2005 | 0.07x | CN¥15.12 Million | CN¥218.84 Million | ▼ -58.0% |
| 2004 | 0.16x | CN¥26.61 Million | CN¥161.53 Million | ▲ +128.7% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | CN¥9.44 Million | CN¥131.04 Million | ▲ +362.7% |
| 2002 | 0.02x | CN¥1.91 Million | CN¥122.65 Million | ▼ -89.8% |
| 2001 | 0.15x | CN¥20.27 Million | CN¥132.74 Million | ▲ +238.6% |
| 2000 | 0.05x | CN¥5.97 Million | CN¥132.36 Million | ▼ -76.8% |
| 1999 | 0.19x | CN¥25.25 Million | CN¥129.77 Million | ▲ +15.0% |
| 1998 | 0.17x | CN¥23.43 Million | CN¥138.49 Million | — |