China Railway Tielong Container Logistics Co Ltd (600125) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
China Railway Tielong Container Logistics Co Ltd (600125) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥178.03 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥2.16 Billion) in one year. See 600125 financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
China Railway Tielong Container Logistics Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for China Railway Tielong Container Logistics Co Ltd across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of China Railway Tielong Container Logistic.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for China Railway Tielong Container Logistics Co Ltd (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for China Railway Tielong Container Logistics Co Ltd. Check China Railway Tielong Container Logistic cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CNY) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.26x | CN¥689.97 Million | CN¥2.68 Billion | ▲ +30.4% |
| 2024 | 0.20x | CN¥616.13 Million | CN¥3.12 Billion | ▲ +326.9% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | CN¥136.51 Million | CN¥2.95 Billion | ▼ -85.0% |
| 2022 | 0.31x | CN¥836.11 Million | CN¥2.72 Billion | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2021 | 0.24x | CN¥638.61 Million | CN¥2.66 Billion | ▲ +110.8% |
| 2020 | 0.11x | CN¥371.66 Million | CN¥3.26 Billion | ▼ -40.2% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | CN¥741.77 Million | CN¥3.90 Billion | ▼ -12.6% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | CN¥847.02 Million | CN¥3.89 Billion | ▲ +113.6% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | CN¥361.12 Million | CN¥3.54 Billion | ▼ -46.2% |
| 2016 | 0.19x | CN¥468.48 Million | CN¥2.47 Billion | ▲ +20.0% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | CN¥422.72 Million | CN¥2.68 Billion | ▼ -45.5% |
| 2014 | 0.29x | CN¥579.06 Million | CN¥2.00 Billion | ▲ +180.4% |
| 2013 | 0.10x | CN¥108.19 Million | CN¥1.05 Billion | ▼ -79.0% |
| 2012 | 0.49x | CN¥334.86 Million | CN¥678.94 Million | ▼ -55.0% |
| 2011 | 1.10x | CN¥464.32 Million | CN¥423.29 Million | ▲ +255.7% |
| 2010 | 0.31x | CN¥95.72 Million | CN¥310.35 Million | ▼ -85.8% |
| 2009 | 2.17x | CN¥711.71 Million | CN¥328.65 Million | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2008 | 1.37x | CN¥270.13 Million | CN¥197.37 Million | ▲ +119.1% |
| 2007 | 0.62x | CN¥450.81 Million | CN¥721.53 Million | ▲ +79.9% |
| 2006 | 0.35x | CN¥476.33 Million | CN¥1.37 Billion | ▲ +192.3% |
| 2005 | -0.38x | CN¥-156.93 Million | CN¥416.90 Million | ▼ -120.7% |
| 2004 | 1.82x | CN¥212.27 Million | CN¥116.52 Million | ▲ +216.3% |
| 2003 | 0.58x | CN¥79.65 Million | CN¥138.28 Million | ▲ +74.7% |
| 2002 | 0.33x | CN¥91.32 Million | CN¥276.96 Million | ▼ -38.8% |
| 2001 | 0.54x | CN¥154.41 Million | CN¥286.75 Million | ▲ +73.6% |
| 2000 | 0.31x | CN¥110.52 Million | CN¥356.38 Million | ▲ +23.5% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | CN¥109.54 Million | CN¥436.27 Million | ▲ +79.1% |
| 1998 | 0.14x | CN¥34.74 Million | CN¥247.83 Million | — |