Opple Lighting Co Ltd (603515) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 2.70x

Opple Lighting Co Ltd (603515) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 2.70x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥7.05 Billion could theoretically repay 3% of its total liabilities (CN¥2.61 Billion) in one year. See how financially flexible is Opple Lighting Co Ltd to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

2.70x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CN¥7.05 Billion
CNY

Total Liabilities

CN¥2.61 Billion
CNY

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Opple Lighting Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2011–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Opple Lighting Co Ltd across 15 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Opple Lighting Co Ltd operating cash flow efficiency.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Opple Lighting Co Ltd (2011–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Opple Lighting Co Ltd. Check Opple Lighting Co Ltd cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CNY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.26x CN¥689.87 Million CN¥2.60 Billion ▼ -4.5%
2024 0.28x CN¥819.14 Million CN¥2.95 Billion ▼ -46.5%
2023 0.52x CN¥1.67 Billion CN¥3.21 Billion ▲ +209.4%
2022 0.17x CN¥434.08 Million CN¥2.59 Billion ▼ -21.1%
2021 0.21x CN¥689.38 Million CN¥3.25 Billion ▼ -31.9%
2020 0.31x CN¥1.03 Billion CN¥3.31 Billion ▼ -13.5%
2019 0.36x CN¥1.11 Billion CN¥3.09 Billion ▲ +73.8%
2018 0.21x CN¥621.05 Million CN¥3.00 Billion ▼ -44.9%
2017 0.38x CN¥1.00 Billion CN¥2.67 Billion ▼ -34.5%
2016 0.57x CN¥1.16 Billion CN¥2.02 Billion ▲ +104.9%
2015 0.28x CN¥414.32 Million CN¥1.48 Billion ▲ +129.8%
2014 0.12x CN¥142.36 Million CN¥1.17 Billion ▼ -74.5%
2013 0.48x CN¥512.44 Million CN¥1.07 Billion ▲ +16.9%
2012 0.41x CN¥415.01 Million CN¥1.01 Billion ▲ +163.8%
2011 0.16x CN¥155.69 Million CN¥1.00 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.