Shenzhen United Winners Laser Co Ltd (688518) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.02x

Shenzhen United Winners Laser Co Ltd (688518) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CN¥76.75 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CN¥4.62 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Shenzhen United Winners Laser Co Ltd to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.02x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

CN¥76.75 Million
CNY

Total Liabilities

CN¥4.62 Billion
CNY

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Shenzhen United Winners Laser Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2013–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Shenzhen United Winners Laser Co Ltd across 12 annual periods. Also explore 688518 shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Shenzhen United Winners Laser Co Ltd (2013–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Shenzhen United Winners Laser Co Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Shenzhen United Winners Laser Co Ltd.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (CNY) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 -0.03x CN¥-126.84 Million CN¥3.90 Billion ▼ -154.6%
2023 0.06x CN¥236.31 Million CN¥3.96 Billion ▲ +216.3%
2022 -0.05x CN¥-199.04 Million CN¥3.88 Billion ▼ -1152.7%
2021 0.00x CN¥-10.21 Million CN¥2.49 Billion ▼ -101.8%
2020 0.23x CN¥256.35 Million CN¥1.10 Billion ▲ +61.7%
2019 0.14x CN¥104.05 Million CN¥720.46 Million ▲ +172.8%
2018 -0.20x CN¥-174.04 Million CN¥877.05 Million ▼ -310.2%
2017 -0.05x CN¥-51.06 Million CN¥1.06 Billion ▲ +54.6%
2016 -0.11x CN¥-58.81 Million CN¥551.57 Million ▼ -192.8%
2015 0.11x CN¥31.97 Million CN¥278.22 Million ▼ -7.0%
2014 0.12x CN¥18.30 Million CN¥148.11 Million ▼ -19.7%
2013 0.15x CN¥11.74 Million CN¥76.32 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.