China Gold International Resources (CGG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
China Gold International Resources (CGG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.22x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$265.82 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.20 Billion) in one year. Explore investment intensity of China Gold International Resources to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
China Gold International Resources Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2001–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for China Gold International Resources across 25 annual periods. Also explore China Gold International Resources assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for China Gold International Resources (2001–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for China Gold International Resources. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see China Gold International Resources market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.70x | CA$709.98 Million | CA$1.02 Billion | ▲ +160.9% |
| 2024 | 0.27x | CA$306.90 Million | CA$1.15 Billion | ▲ +18672.1% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | CA$1.57 Million | CA$1.11 Billion | ▼ -99.6% |
| 2022 | 0.35x | CA$447.28 Million | CA$1.29 Billion | ▲ +18.2% |
| 2021 | 0.29x | CA$417.27 Million | CA$1.42 Billion | ▲ +94.4% |
| 2020 | 0.15x | CA$260.46 Million | CA$1.73 Billion | ▲ +66.4% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | CA$158.31 Million | CA$1.75 Billion | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | CA$154.94 Million | CA$1.73 Billion | ▲ +56.7% |
| 2017 | 0.06x | CA$98.55 Million | CA$1.72 Billion | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2016 | 0.05x | CA$79.33 Million | CA$1.55 Billion | ▲ +2.3% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | CA$66.87 Million | CA$1.33 Billion | ▲ +2512.7% |
| 2014 | 0.00x | CA$2.97 Million | CA$1.55 Billion | ▼ -98.4% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | CA$93.79 Million | CA$786.98 Million | ▼ -42.4% |
| 2012 | 0.21x | CA$90.78 Million | CA$438.47 Million | ▼ -18.7% |
| 2011 | 0.25x | CA$115.60 Million | CA$454.01 Million | ▲ +955.5% |
| 2010 | 0.02x | CA$10.91 Million | CA$452.19 Million | ▼ -69.4% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | CA$10.76 Million | CA$136.47 Million | ▲ +121.6% |
| 2008 | -0.36x | CA$-29.45 Million | CA$80.83 Million | ▼ -397.0% |
| 2007 | -0.07x | CA$-4.68 Million | CA$63.79 Million | ▲ +78.4% |
| 2006 | -0.34x | CA$-8.20 Million | CA$24.20 Million | ▲ +87.6% |
| 2005 | -2.74x | CA$-3.31 Million | CA$1.21 Million | ▲ +50.5% |
| 2004 | -5.54x | CA$-4.10 Million | CA$741.11K | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2003 | -13.24x | CA$-4.39 Million | CA$331.63K | ▼ -202.5% |
| 2002 | -4.38x | CA$-620.94K | CA$141.88K | ▲ +16.2% |
| 2001 | -5.22x | CA$-261.34K | CA$50.06K | — |