Colliers International Group Inc Bats (CIGI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Colliers International Group Inc Bats (CIGI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-191.53 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$4.12 Billion) in one year. See CIGI free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Colliers International Group Inc Bats Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Colliers International Group Inc Bats across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Colliers International Group Inc Bats.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Colliers International Group Inc Bats (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Colliers International Group Inc Bats. Check how high is Colliers International Group Inc Bats's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | CA$312.42 Million | CA$3.96 Billion | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2024 | 0.09x | CA$326.01 Million | CA$3.62 Billion | ▲ +93.4% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | CA$165.66 Million | CA$3.56 Billion | ▲ +219.7% |
| 2022 | 0.01x | CA$67.03 Million | CA$4.60 Billion | ▼ -86.1% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | CA$288.98 Million | CA$2.75 Billion | ▲ +70.7% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | CA$166.48 Million | CA$2.71 Billion | ▼ -60.1% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | CA$310.76 Million | CA$2.02 Billion | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2018 | 0.16x | CA$257.49 Million | CA$1.62 Billion | ▼ -24.9% |
| 2017 | 0.21x | CA$212.85 Million | CA$1.01 Billion | ▲ +14.6% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | CA$156.26 Million | CA$847.46 Million | ▼ -5.8% |
| 2015 | 0.20x | CA$157.24 Million | CA$803.34 Million | ▲ +44.6% |
| 2014 | 0.14x | CA$159.07 Million | CA$1.18 Billion | ▲ +13.2% |
| 2013 | 0.12x | CA$116.28 Million | CA$972.39 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | CA$102.99 Million | CA$926.01 Million | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | CA$80.21 Million | CA$848.70 Million | ▼ -37.7% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | CA$115.05 Million | CA$758.86 Million | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2009 | 0.12x | CA$81.05 Million | CA$679.33 Million | ▲ +51.3% |
| 2007 | 0.08x | CA$57.17 Million | CA$725.19 Million | ▼ -33.6% |
| 2006 | 0.12x | CA$59.79 Million | CA$503.82 Million | ▼ -11.1% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | CA$59.35 Million | CA$444.79 Million | ▲ +49.3% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | CA$37.03 Million | CA$414.39 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | CA$35.06 Million | CA$266.35 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | CA$32.55 Million | CA$237.40 Million | ▲ +35.6% |
| 2001 | 0.10x | CA$24.96 Million | CA$246.91 Million | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | CA$22.29 Million | CA$225.38 Million | ▼ -21.8% |
| 1999 | 0.13x | CA$19.67 Million | CA$155.57 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 1998 | 0.07x | CA$8.40 Million | CA$119.40 Million | ▼ -45.3% |
| 1997 | 0.13x | CA$9.60 Million | CA$74.60 Million | ▲ +63.1% |
| 1996 | 0.08x | CA$4.30 Million | CA$54.50 Million | ▼ -27.5% |
| 1995 | 0.11x | CA$3.20 Million | CA$29.40 Million | ▲ +972.1% |
| 1994 | 0.01x | CA$200.00K | CA$19.70 Million | ▼ -93.6% |
| 1993 | 0.16x | CA$1.80 Million | CA$11.30 Million | ▲ +1524.8% |
| 1992 | 0.01x | CA$100.00K | CA$10.20 Million | — |