Canadian Tire Corporation Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Canadian Tire Corporation Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio. Canadian Tire Corporation Limited (CTC-A) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$35.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$15.04 Billion) in one year. Check Canadian Tire Corporation Limited cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Canadian Tire Corporation Limited (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Canadian Tire Corporation Limited from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Canadian Tire Corporation Limited across 30 annual periods. Check CTC-A cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Canadian Tire Corporation Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Canadian Tire Corporation Limited cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Canadian Tire Corporation Limited. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Canadian Tire Corporation Limited (CTC-A) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.06x | CA$952.10 Million | CA$14.73 Billion | ▼ -52.5% |
| 2024 | 0.14x | CA$2.06 Billion | CA$15.15 Billion | ▲ +56.3% |
| 2023 | 0.09x | CA$1.35 Billion | CA$15.53 Billion | ▲ +181.4% |
| 2022 | 0.03x | CA$466.50 Million | CA$15.06 Billion | ▼ -72.7% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | CA$1.74 Billion | CA$15.29 Billion | ▼ -32.4% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | CA$2.44 Billion | CA$14.54 Billion | ▲ +116.4% |
| 2019 | 0.08x | CA$1.09 Billion | CA$14.01 Billion | ▼ -19.7% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | CA$972.80 Million | CA$10.06 Billion | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | CA$986.40 Million | CA$9.57 Billion | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2016 | 0.11x | CA$978.90 Million | CA$9.20 Billion | ▲ +65.3% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | CA$574.50 Million | CA$8.92 Billion | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2014 | 0.11x | CA$893.00 Million | CA$8.18 Billion | ▲ +23.7% |
| 2013 | 0.09x | CA$743.00 Million | CA$8.42 Billion | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2012 | 0.18x | CA$1.41 Billion | CA$7.93 Billion | ▼ -16.0% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | CA$991.20 Million | CA$4.70 Billion | ▲ +161.2% |
| 2010 | 0.08x | CA$418.80 Million | CA$5.18 Billion | ▲ +87.8% |
| 2009 | 0.04x | CA$181.50 Million | CA$4.22 Billion | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2008 | 0.05x | CA$174.70 Million | CA$3.66 Billion | ▼ -78.9% |
| 2007 | 0.23x | CA$682.50 Million | CA$3.02 Billion | ▲ +71.9% |
| 2006 | 0.13x | CA$413.50 Million | CA$3.14 Billion | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2005 | 0.15x | CA$411.00 Million | CA$2.67 Billion | ▼ -23.9% |
| 2004 | 0.20x | CA$520.10 Million | CA$2.57 Billion | ▲ +26.2% |
| 2003 | 0.16x | CA$444.30 Million | CA$2.77 Billion | ▲ +111.8% |
| 2002 | 0.08x | CA$186.94 Million | CA$2.47 Billion | ▼ -65.5% |
| 2001 | 0.22x | CA$502.34 Million | CA$2.29 Billion | ▲ +71.5% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | CA$323.50 Million | CA$2.53 Billion | ▼ -34.0% |
| 1999 | 0.19x | CA$369.40 Million | CA$1.90 Billion | ▲ +51.4% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | CA$202.00 Million | CA$1.58 Billion | ▼ -28.7% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | CA$234.40 Million | CA$1.30 Billion | ▲ +279.2% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | CA$68.00 Million | CA$1.44 Billion | — |