Freehold Royalties Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Freehold Royalties Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.15x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$55.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$372.68 Million) in one year. Check FRU cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Freehold Royalties Ltd. (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Freehold Royalties Ltd. from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Freehold Royalties Ltd. across 30 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Freehold Royalties Ltd. to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Freehold Royalties Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Freehold Royalties Ltd. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Freehold Royalties Ltd.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Freehold Royalties Ltd. cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.63x | CA$235.38 Million | CA$372.68 Million | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2024 | 0.58x | CA$223.33 Million | CA$383.02 Million | ▼ -47.7% |
| 2023 | 1.11x | CA$216.92 Million | CA$194.66 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2022 | 1.30x | CA$327.35 Million | CA$251.66 Million | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2021 | 0.90x | CA$162.02 Million | CA$179.54 Million | ▲ +133.9% |
| 2020 | 0.39x | CA$65.77 Million | CA$170.47 Million | ▼ -51.7% |
| 2019 | 0.80x | CA$105.80 Million | CA$132.42 Million | ▼ -31.8% |
| 2018 | 1.17x | CA$133.12 Million | CA$113.68 Million | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2017 | 0.96x | CA$119.27 Million | CA$124.69 Million | ▲ +26.1% |
| 2016 | 0.76x | CA$93.13 Million | CA$122.75 Million | ▲ +35.1% |
| 2015 | 0.56x | CA$110.51 Million | CA$196.77 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2014 | 0.58x | CA$134.39 Million | CA$232.41 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2013 | 0.70x | CA$93.23 Million | CA$133.79 Million | ▼ -33.2% |
| 2012 | 1.04x | CA$138.13 Million | CA$132.42 Million | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2011 | 0.79x | CA$118.37 Million | CA$150.47 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2010 | 0.78x | CA$110.69 Million | CA$141.29 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2009 | 0.80x | CA$95.66 Million | CA$119.57 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2008 | 0.77x | CA$179.25 Million | CA$232.27 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 2007 | 0.47x | CA$119.64 Million | CA$253.09 Million | ▼ -53.1% |
| 2006 | 1.01x | CA$130.93 Million | CA$129.78 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2005 | 0.72x | CA$97.07 Million | CA$134.61 Million | ▼ -51.4% |
| 2004 | 1.48x | CA$64.10 Million | CA$43.18 Million | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2003 | 2.20x | CA$63.86 Million | CA$29.05 Million | ▲ +77.7% |
| 2002 | 1.24x | CA$48.05 Million | CA$38.84 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2001 | 1.33x | CA$52.24 Million | CA$39.14 Million | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2000 | 1.11x | CA$48.99 Million | CA$44.33 Million | ▲ +109.2% |
| 1999 | 0.53x | CA$24.50 Million | CA$46.37 Million | ▲ +59.9% |
| 1998 | 0.33x | CA$16.04 Million | CA$48.56 Million | ▼ -44.0% |
| 1997 | 0.59x | CA$28.57 Million | CA$48.48 Million | ▲ +1557.8% |
| 1996 | -0.04x | CA$-598.36K | CA$14.80 Million | — |