Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Freehold Royalties Ltd. (FRU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.15x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$55.01 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$372.68 Million) in one year. See Freehold Royalties Ltd. free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Freehold Royalties Ltd. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Freehold Royalties Ltd. across 30 annual periods. Also explore Freehold Royalties Ltd. annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Freehold Royalties Ltd. (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Freehold Royalties Ltd.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Freehold Royalties Ltd..
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.63x | CA$235.38 Million | CA$372.68 Million | ▲ +8.3% |
| 2024 | 0.58x | CA$223.33 Million | CA$383.02 Million | ▼ -47.7% |
| 2023 | 1.11x | CA$216.92 Million | CA$194.66 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2022 | 1.30x | CA$327.35 Million | CA$251.66 Million | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2021 | 0.90x | CA$162.02 Million | CA$179.54 Million | ▲ +133.9% |
| 2020 | 0.39x | CA$65.77 Million | CA$170.47 Million | ▼ -51.7% |
| 2019 | 0.80x | CA$105.80 Million | CA$132.42 Million | ▼ -31.8% |
| 2018 | 1.17x | CA$133.12 Million | CA$113.68 Million | ▲ +22.4% |
| 2017 | 0.96x | CA$119.27 Million | CA$124.69 Million | ▲ +26.1% |
| 2016 | 0.76x | CA$93.13 Million | CA$122.75 Million | ▲ +35.1% |
| 2015 | 0.56x | CA$110.51 Million | CA$196.77 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2014 | 0.58x | CA$134.39 Million | CA$232.41 Million | ▼ -17.0% |
| 2013 | 0.70x | CA$93.23 Million | CA$133.79 Million | ▼ -33.2% |
| 2012 | 1.04x | CA$138.13 Million | CA$132.42 Million | ▲ +32.6% |
| 2011 | 0.79x | CA$118.37 Million | CA$150.47 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2010 | 0.78x | CA$110.69 Million | CA$141.29 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2009 | 0.80x | CA$95.66 Million | CA$119.57 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 2008 | 0.77x | CA$179.25 Million | CA$232.27 Million | ▲ +63.3% |
| 2007 | 0.47x | CA$119.64 Million | CA$253.09 Million | ▼ -53.1% |
| 2006 | 1.01x | CA$130.93 Million | CA$129.78 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2005 | 0.72x | CA$97.07 Million | CA$134.61 Million | ▼ -51.4% |
| 2004 | 1.48x | CA$64.10 Million | CA$43.18 Million | ▼ -32.5% |
| 2003 | 2.20x | CA$63.86 Million | CA$29.05 Million | ▲ +77.7% |
| 2002 | 1.24x | CA$48.05 Million | CA$38.84 Million | ▼ -7.3% |
| 2001 | 1.33x | CA$52.24 Million | CA$39.14 Million | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2000 | 1.11x | CA$48.99 Million | CA$44.33 Million | ▲ +109.2% |
| 1999 | 0.53x | CA$24.50 Million | CA$46.37 Million | ▲ +59.9% |
| 1998 | 0.33x | CA$16.04 Million | CA$48.56 Million | ▼ -44.0% |
| 1997 | 0.59x | CA$28.57 Million | CA$48.48 Million | ▲ +1557.8% |
| 1996 | -0.04x | CA$-598.36K | CA$14.80 Million | — |