Glacier Media Inc. (GVC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Glacier Media Inc. (GVC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$3.41 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$84.79 Million) in one year. See Glacier Media Inc. (GVC) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Glacier Media Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Glacier Media Inc. across 29 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Glacier Media Inc. to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Glacier Media Inc. (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Glacier Media Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Glacier Media Inc. market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | CA$7.92 Million | CA$85.85 Million | ▲ +112.5% |
| 2024 | 0.04x | CA$4.55 Million | CA$104.94 Million | ▲ +166.1% |
| 2023 | -0.07x | CA$-7.04 Million | CA$107.27 Million | ▼ -158.3% |
| 2022 | 0.11x | CA$7.95 Million | CA$70.52 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | CA$14.11 Million | CA$74.66 Million | ▼ -49.1% |
| 2020 | 0.37x | CA$26.32 Million | CA$70.81 Million | ▲ +542.7% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | CA$4.21 Million | CA$72.88 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2018 | 0.08x | CA$6.98 Million | CA$86.53 Million | ▼ -42.7% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | CA$12.01 Million | CA$85.32 Million | ▲ +18.9% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | CA$11.78 Million | CA$99.53 Million | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | CA$12.77 Million | CA$126.89 Million | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2014 | 0.16x | CA$25.46 Million | CA$161.12 Million | ▼ -16.8% |
| 2013 | 0.19x | CA$34.34 Million | CA$180.80 Million | ▲ +8.5% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | CA$39.84 Million | CA$227.69 Million | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | CA$49.41 Million | CA$239.13 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | CA$37.25 Million | CA$181.33 Million | ▲ +44.9% |
| 2009 | 0.14x | CA$25.59 Million | CA$180.58 Million | ▼ -35.2% |
| 2008 | 0.22x | CA$46.01 Million | CA$210.37 Million | ▲ +52.1% |
| 2007 | 0.14x | CA$27.35 Million | CA$190.18 Million | ▲ +27.0% |
| 2006 | 0.11x | CA$26.84 Million | CA$237.07 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | CA$6.27 Million | CA$48.52 Million | ▼ -19.9% |
| 2004 | 0.16x | CA$6.03 Million | CA$37.40 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2003 | 0.18x | CA$5.42 Million | CA$30.28 Million | ▼ -5.3% |
| 2002 | 0.19x | CA$4.38 Million | CA$23.19 Million | ▲ +349.8% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | CA$852.38K | CA$20.29 Million | ▼ -28.6% |
| 2000 | 0.06x | CA$1.19 Million | CA$20.29 Million | ▲ +1523.6% |
| 1999 | 0.00x | CA$100.00K | CA$27.60 Million | ▲ +100.2% |
| 1998 | -1.50x | CA$-300.00K | CA$200.00K | ▼ -28.6% |
| 1997 | -1.17x | CA$-700.00K | CA$600.00K | — |