Imperial Metals Corporation (III) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Imperial Metals Corporation (III) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$68.34 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$878.77 Million) in one year. See Imperial Metals Corporation (III) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Imperial Metals Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Imperial Metals Corporation across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Imperial Metals Corporation.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Imperial Metals Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Imperial Metals Corporation. Check earnings quality score of Imperial Metals Corporation to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.46x | CA$348.56 Million | CA$766.00 Million | ▲ +144.3% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | CA$155.41 Million | CA$834.25 Million | ▲ +3497.4% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | CA$-3.81 Million | CA$695.76 Million | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2022 | -0.15x | CA$-86.76 Million | CA$563.97 Million | ▼ -533.6% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | CA$15.02 Million | CA$423.25 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | CA$23.84 Million | CA$362.84 Million | ▲ +217.1% |
| 2019 | -0.06x | CA$-18.16 Million | CA$323.43 Million | ▼ -187.9% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | CA$74.75 Million | CA$1.17 Billion | ▲ +203.7% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | CA$25.44 Million | CA$1.21 Billion | ▼ -68.5% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | CA$75.97 Million | CA$1.14 Billion | ▲ +213.6% |
| 2015 | -0.06x | CA$-64.75 Million | CA$1.10 Billion | ▼ -423.4% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | CA$16.89 Million | CA$930.36 Million | ▼ -87.2% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | CA$79.11 Million | CA$557.29 Million | ▼ -3.3% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | CA$42.41 Million | CA$288.78 Million | ▼ -81.0% |
| 2011 | 0.77x | CA$117.41 Million | CA$151.89 Million | ▲ +123.8% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | CA$45.33 Million | CA$131.24 Million | ▲ +422.5% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | CA$9.19 Million | CA$138.96 Million | ▼ -88.9% |
| 2008 | 0.60x | CA$90.14 Million | CA$150.75 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2007 | 0.56x | CA$81.06 Million | CA$144.45 Million | ▼ -44.0% |
| 2006 | 1.00x | CA$73.04 Million | CA$72.90 Million | ▲ +734.6% |
| 2005 | -0.16x | CA$-14.72 Million | CA$93.25 Million | ▼ -286.0% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | CA$-1.47 Million | CA$35.99 Million | ▼ -3954.2% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | CA$36.61K | CA$34.50 Million | ▼ -96.7% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | CA$3.07 Million | CA$96.27 Million | ▼ -74.7% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | CA$13.82 Million | CA$109.87 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | CA$13.95 Million | CA$111.60 Million | ▲ +28.6% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | CA$13.40 Million | CA$137.80 Million | ▲ +64.5% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | CA$9.10 Million | CA$153.90 Million | ▲ +146.7% |
| 1997 | -0.13x | CA$-7.90 Million | CA$62.40 Million | ▼ -164.5% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | CA$6.10 Million | CA$31.10 Million | ▼ -67.3% |
| 1995 | 0.60x | CA$3.00 Million | CA$5.00 Million | ▲ +170.0% |
| 1994 | 0.22x | CA$800.00K | CA$3.60 Million | — |