Imperial Metals Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Imperial Metals Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Imperial Metals Corporation (III) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$53.97 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$926.35 Million) in one year. Check Imperial Metals Corporation (III) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Imperial Metals Corporation (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Imperial Metals Corporation from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Imperial Metals Corporation across 32 annual periods. Check III operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Imperial Metals Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Imperial Metals Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Imperial Metals Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Imperial Metals Corporation generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.46x | CA$348.56 Million | CA$766.00 Million | ▲ +144.3% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | CA$155.41 Million | CA$834.25 Million | ▲ +3497.4% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | CA$-3.81 Million | CA$695.76 Million | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2022 | -0.15x | CA$-86.76 Million | CA$563.97 Million | ▼ -533.6% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | CA$15.02 Million | CA$423.25 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | CA$23.84 Million | CA$362.84 Million | ▲ +217.1% |
| 2019 | -0.06x | CA$-18.16 Million | CA$323.43 Million | ▼ -187.9% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | CA$74.75 Million | CA$1.17 Billion | ▲ +203.7% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | CA$25.44 Million | CA$1.21 Billion | ▼ -68.5% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | CA$75.97 Million | CA$1.14 Billion | ▲ +213.6% |
| 2015 | -0.06x | CA$-64.75 Million | CA$1.10 Billion | ▼ -423.4% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | CA$16.89 Million | CA$930.36 Million | ▼ -87.2% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | CA$79.11 Million | CA$557.29 Million | ▼ -3.3% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | CA$42.41 Million | CA$288.78 Million | ▼ -81.0% |
| 2011 | 0.77x | CA$117.41 Million | CA$151.89 Million | ▲ +123.8% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | CA$45.33 Million | CA$131.24 Million | ▲ +422.5% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | CA$9.19 Million | CA$138.96 Million | ▼ -88.9% |
| 2008 | 0.60x | CA$90.14 Million | CA$150.75 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2007 | 0.56x | CA$81.06 Million | CA$144.45 Million | ▼ -44.0% |
| 2006 | 1.00x | CA$73.04 Million | CA$72.90 Million | ▲ +734.6% |
| 2005 | -0.16x | CA$-14.72 Million | CA$93.25 Million | ▼ -286.0% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | CA$-1.47 Million | CA$35.99 Million | ▼ -3954.2% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | CA$36.61K | CA$34.50 Million | ▼ -96.7% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | CA$3.07 Million | CA$96.27 Million | ▼ -74.7% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | CA$13.82 Million | CA$109.87 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | CA$13.95 Million | CA$111.60 Million | ▲ +28.6% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | CA$13.40 Million | CA$137.80 Million | ▲ +64.5% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | CA$9.10 Million | CA$153.90 Million | ▲ +146.7% |
| 1997 | -0.13x | CA$-7.90 Million | CA$62.40 Million | ▼ -164.5% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | CA$6.10 Million | CA$31.10 Million | ▼ -67.3% |
| 1995 | 0.60x | CA$3.00 Million | CA$5.00 Million | ▲ +170.0% |
| 1994 | 0.22x | CA$800.00K | CA$3.60 Million | — |