Imperial Metals Corporation (III) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Imperial Metals Corporation (III) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$68.34 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$878.77 Million) in one year. See III free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Imperial Metals Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Imperial Metals Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore III shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Imperial Metals Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Imperial Metals Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Imperial Metals Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.46x | CA$348.56 Million | CA$766.00 Million | ▲ +144.3% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | CA$155.41 Million | CA$834.25 Million | ▲ +3497.4% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | CA$-3.81 Million | CA$695.76 Million | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2022 | -0.15x | CA$-86.76 Million | CA$563.97 Million | ▼ -533.6% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | CA$15.02 Million | CA$423.25 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | CA$23.84 Million | CA$362.84 Million | ▲ +217.1% |
| 2019 | -0.06x | CA$-18.16 Million | CA$323.43 Million | ▼ -187.9% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | CA$74.75 Million | CA$1.17 Billion | ▲ +203.7% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | CA$25.44 Million | CA$1.21 Billion | ▼ -68.5% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | CA$75.97 Million | CA$1.14 Billion | ▲ +213.6% |
| 2015 | -0.06x | CA$-64.75 Million | CA$1.10 Billion | ▼ -423.4% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | CA$16.89 Million | CA$930.36 Million | ▼ -87.2% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | CA$79.11 Million | CA$557.29 Million | ▼ -3.3% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | CA$42.41 Million | CA$288.78 Million | ▼ -81.0% |
| 2011 | 0.77x | CA$117.41 Million | CA$151.89 Million | ▲ +123.8% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | CA$45.33 Million | CA$131.24 Million | ▲ +422.5% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | CA$9.19 Million | CA$138.96 Million | ▼ -88.9% |
| 2008 | 0.60x | CA$90.14 Million | CA$150.75 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2007 | 0.56x | CA$81.06 Million | CA$144.45 Million | ▼ -44.0% |
| 2006 | 1.00x | CA$73.04 Million | CA$72.90 Million | ▲ +734.6% |
| 2005 | -0.16x | CA$-14.72 Million | CA$93.25 Million | ▼ -286.0% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | CA$-1.47 Million | CA$35.99 Million | ▼ -3954.2% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | CA$36.61K | CA$34.50 Million | ▼ -96.7% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | CA$3.07 Million | CA$96.27 Million | ▼ -74.7% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | CA$13.82 Million | CA$109.87 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | CA$13.95 Million | CA$111.60 Million | ▲ +28.6% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | CA$13.40 Million | CA$137.80 Million | ▲ +64.5% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | CA$9.10 Million | CA$153.90 Million | ▲ +146.7% |
| 1997 | -0.13x | CA$-7.90 Million | CA$62.40 Million | ▼ -164.5% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | CA$6.10 Million | CA$31.10 Million | ▼ -67.3% |
| 1995 | 0.60x | CA$3.00 Million | CA$5.00 Million | ▲ +170.0% |
| 1994 | 0.22x | CA$800.00K | CA$3.60 Million | — |