Imperial Metals Corporation (III) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Imperial Metals Corporation (III) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$68.34 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$878.77 Million) in one year. Explore investment intensity of Imperial Metals Corporation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Imperial Metals Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Imperial Metals Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore Imperial Metals Corporation asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Imperial Metals Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Imperial Metals Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Imperial Metals Corporation market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.46x | CA$348.56 Million | CA$766.00 Million | ▲ +144.3% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | CA$155.41 Million | CA$834.25 Million | ▲ +3497.4% |
| 2023 | -0.01x | CA$-3.81 Million | CA$695.76 Million | ▲ +96.4% |
| 2022 | -0.15x | CA$-86.76 Million | CA$563.97 Million | ▼ -533.6% |
| 2021 | 0.04x | CA$15.02 Million | CA$423.25 Million | ▼ -46.0% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | CA$23.84 Million | CA$362.84 Million | ▲ +217.1% |
| 2019 | -0.06x | CA$-18.16 Million | CA$323.43 Million | ▼ -187.9% |
| 2018 | 0.06x | CA$74.75 Million | CA$1.17 Billion | ▲ +203.7% |
| 2017 | 0.02x | CA$25.44 Million | CA$1.21 Billion | ▼ -68.5% |
| 2016 | 0.07x | CA$75.97 Million | CA$1.14 Billion | ▲ +213.6% |
| 2015 | -0.06x | CA$-64.75 Million | CA$1.10 Billion | ▼ -423.4% |
| 2014 | 0.02x | CA$16.89 Million | CA$930.36 Million | ▼ -87.2% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | CA$79.11 Million | CA$557.29 Million | ▼ -3.3% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | CA$42.41 Million | CA$288.78 Million | ▼ -81.0% |
| 2011 | 0.77x | CA$117.41 Million | CA$151.89 Million | ▲ +123.8% |
| 2010 | 0.35x | CA$45.33 Million | CA$131.24 Million | ▲ +422.5% |
| 2009 | 0.07x | CA$9.19 Million | CA$138.96 Million | ▼ -88.9% |
| 2008 | 0.60x | CA$90.14 Million | CA$150.75 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2007 | 0.56x | CA$81.06 Million | CA$144.45 Million | ▼ -44.0% |
| 2006 | 1.00x | CA$73.04 Million | CA$72.90 Million | ▲ +734.6% |
| 2005 | -0.16x | CA$-14.72 Million | CA$93.25 Million | ▼ -286.0% |
| 2004 | -0.04x | CA$-1.47 Million | CA$35.99 Million | ▼ -3954.2% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | CA$36.61K | CA$34.50 Million | ▼ -96.7% |
| 2002 | 0.03x | CA$3.07 Million | CA$96.27 Million | ▼ -74.7% |
| 2001 | 0.13x | CA$13.82 Million | CA$109.87 Million | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | CA$13.95 Million | CA$111.60 Million | ▲ +28.6% |
| 1999 | 0.10x | CA$13.40 Million | CA$137.80 Million | ▲ +64.5% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | CA$9.10 Million | CA$153.90 Million | ▲ +146.7% |
| 1997 | -0.13x | CA$-7.90 Million | CA$62.40 Million | ▼ -164.5% |
| 1996 | 0.20x | CA$6.10 Million | CA$31.10 Million | ▼ -67.3% |
| 1995 | 0.60x | CA$3.00 Million | CA$5.00 Million | ▲ +170.0% |
| 1994 | 0.22x | CA$800.00K | CA$3.60 Million | — |