Maple Leaf Foods Inc. (MFI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Maple Leaf Foods Inc. (MFI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$72.23 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$2.81 Billion) in one year. See Maple Leaf Foods Inc. (MFI) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Maple Leaf Foods Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Maple Leaf Foods Inc. across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Maple Leaf Foods Inc..
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Maple Leaf Foods Inc. (1995–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Maple Leaf Foods Inc.. Check MFI cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.16x | CA$464.92 Million | CA$2.89 Billion | ▲ +180.7% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | CA$176.88 Million | CA$3.09 Billion | ▲ +222.8% |
| 2022 | 0.02x | CA$49.32 Million | CA$2.78 Billion | ▼ -86.3% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | CA$304.79 Million | CA$2.35 Billion | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | CA$321.45 Million | CA$1.93 Billion | ▼ -3.5% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | CA$270.18 Million | CA$1.56 Billion | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2018 | 0.26x | CA$299.69 Million | CA$1.13 Billion | ▼ -60.3% |
| 2017 | 0.67x | CA$386.69 Million | CA$580.96 Million | ▲ +1.5% |
| 2016 | 0.66x | CA$357.16 Million | CA$544.60 Million | ▲ +137.7% |
| 2015 | 0.28x | CA$159.41 Million | CA$577.73 Million | ▲ +148.1% |
| 2014 | -0.57x | CA$-362.22 Million | CA$631.99 Million | ▼ -531.2% |
| 2013 | 0.13x | CA$260.12 Million | CA$1.96 Billion | ▲ +39.3% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | CA$218.08 Million | CA$2.29 Billion | ▼ -21.7% |
| 2011 | 0.12x | CA$244.83 Million | CA$2.01 Billion | ▼ -21.1% |
| 2010 | 0.15x | CA$285.18 Million | CA$1.85 Billion | ▲ +209.2% |
| 2009 | 0.05x | CA$89.21 Million | CA$1.79 Billion | ▼ -42.9% |
| 2008 | 0.09x | CA$195.48 Million | CA$2.23 Billion | ▲ +45.3% |
| 2007 | 0.06x | CA$105.75 Million | CA$1.76 Billion | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2006 | 0.06x | CA$132.01 Million | CA$2.19 Billion | ▼ -52.1% |
| 2005 | 0.13x | CA$264.71 Million | CA$2.10 Billion | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | CA$235.47 Million | CA$2.06 Billion | ▲ +103.8% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | CA$74.94 Million | CA$1.34 Billion | ▼ -60.9% |
| 2002 | 0.14x | CA$195.82 Million | CA$1.36 Billion | ▼ -21.8% |
| 2001 | 0.18x | CA$226.24 Million | CA$1.23 Billion | ▲ +617.1% |
| 2000 | 0.03x | CA$32.10 Million | CA$1.25 Billion | ▼ -80.0% |
| 1999 | 0.13x | CA$136.60 Million | CA$1.07 Billion | ▼ -1.0% |
| 1998 | 0.13x | CA$120.80 Million | CA$935.70 Million | ▲ +130.9% |
| 1997 | 0.06x | CA$61.00 Million | CA$1.09 Billion | ▼ -39.3% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | CA$103.50 Million | CA$1.12 Billion | ▲ +110.9% |
| 1995 | 0.04x | CA$45.50 Million | CA$1.04 Billion | — |