New Pacific Metals Corp (NUAG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
New Pacific Metals Corp (NUAG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.55x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-614.01K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$1.12 Million) in one year. See NUAG FCF to total liabilities ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
New Pacific Metals Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for New Pacific Metals Corp across 25 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see NUAG cash generation efficiency.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for New Pacific Metals Corp (2002–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for New Pacific Metals Corp. Check how high is New Pacific Metals Corp's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -3.13x | CA$-3.52 Million | CA$1.12 Million | ▲ +11.0% |
| 2025 | -3.52x | CA$-3.26 Million | CA$927.45K | ▼ -6.5% |
| 2024 | -3.30x | CA$-4.01 Million | CA$1.21 Million | ▼ -39.9% |
| 2023 | -2.36x | CA$-5.51 Million | CA$2.34 Million | ▼ -100.1% |
| 2022 | -1.18x | CA$-4.56 Million | CA$3.87 Million | ▲ +72.0% |
| 2021 | -4.21x | CA$-4.60 Million | CA$1.09 Million | ▼ -60.2% |
| 2020 | -2.63x | CA$-3.93 Million | CA$1.50 Million | ▼ -146.9% |
| 2019 | -1.06x | CA$-1.92 Million | CA$1.80 Million | ▼ -138.5% |
| 2018 | -0.45x | CA$-627.78K | CA$1.41 Million | ▲ +73.9% |
| 2017 | -1.71x | CA$-534.04K | CA$312.82K | ▼ -53.3% |
| 2016 | -1.11x | CA$-680.34K | CA$610.88K | ▼ -111.3% |
| 2015 | -0.53x | CA$-612.78K | CA$1.16 Million | ▲ +53.9% |
| 2014 | -1.14x | CA$-1.27 Million | CA$1.11 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2013 | -1.37x | CA$-1.17 Million | CA$856.18K | ▲ +31.5% |
| 2012 | -2.00x | CA$-1.72 Million | CA$860.07K | ▲ +61.3% |
| 2011 | -5.17x | CA$-10.15 Million | CA$1.96 Million | ▼ -198.2% |
| 2010 | -1.73x | CA$-1.31 Million | CA$754.15K | ▼ -243.0% |
| 2009 | -0.51x | CA$-195.58K | CA$386.98K | ▲ +74.7% |
| 2008 | -2.00x | CA$-752.34K | CA$376.71K | ▼ -448.4% |
| 2007 | -0.36x | CA$-583.02K | CA$1.60 Million | ▲ +88.0% |
| 2006 | -3.05x | CA$-139.16K | CA$45.70K | ▲ +59.1% |
| 2005 | -7.45x | CA$-237.05K | CA$31.82K | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2004 | -9.39x | CA$-132.88K | CA$14.15K | ▼ -4751.2% |
| 2003 | -0.19x | CA$-55.83K | CA$288.35K | ▲ +40.0% |
| 2002 | -0.32x | CA$-65.17K | CA$201.91K | — |