Obsidian Energy Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Obsidian Energy Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Obsidian Energy Ltd (OBE) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$38.20 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$640.40 Million) in one year. Check OBE cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Obsidian Energy Ltd (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Obsidian Energy Ltd from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Obsidian Energy Ltd across 25 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Obsidian Energy Ltd to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Obsidian Energy Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Obsidian Energy Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Obsidian Energy Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Obsidian Energy Ltd generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.51x | CA$235.70 Million | CA$463.20 Million | ▼ -0.3% |
| 2024 | 0.51x | CA$361.90 Million | CA$708.80 Million | ▼ -12.2% |
| 2023 | 0.58x | CA$352.70 Million | CA$606.60 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2022 | 0.73x | CA$456.80 Million | CA$624.60 Million | ▲ +145.0% |
| 2021 | 0.30x | CA$198.70 Million | CA$665.70 Million | ▲ +141.0% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | CA$79.40 Million | CA$641.00 Million | ▲ +31.0% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | CA$76.80 Million | CA$812.10 Million | ▼ -25.3% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | CA$99.00 Million | CA$782.00 Million | ▼ -14.7% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | CA$125.00 Million | CA$842.00 Million | ▲ +218.3% |
| 2016 | -0.13x | CA$-137.00 Million | CA$1.09 Billion | ▼ -314.3% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | CA$175.00 Million | CA$2.99 Billion | ▼ -70.5% |
| 2014 | 0.20x | CA$848.00 Million | CA$4.27 Billion | ▼ -1.2% |
| 2013 | 0.20x | CA$968.00 Million | CA$4.82 Billion | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2012 | 0.20x | CA$1.13 Billion | CA$5.54 Billion | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2011 | 0.22x | CA$1.41 Billion | CA$6.52 Billion | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | CA$1.22 Billion | CA$5.98 Billion | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2009 | 0.24x | CA$1.40 Billion | CA$5.96 Billion | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2008 | 0.32x | CA$2.26 Billion | CA$7.03 Billion | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2007 | 0.32x | CA$1.24 Billion | CA$3.86 Billion | ▼ -16.3% |
| 2006 | 0.38x | CA$1.11 Billion | CA$2.88 Billion | ▼ -26.1% |
| 2005 | 0.52x | CA$932.80 Million | CA$1.79 Billion | ▲ +20.4% |
| 2004 | 0.43x | CA$845.07 Million | CA$1.96 Billion | ▼ -4.4% |
| 2003 | 0.45x | CA$684.49 Million | CA$1.52 Billion | ▲ +34.5% |
| 2002 | 0.34x | CA$503.11 Million | CA$1.50 Billion | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2001 | 0.51x | CA$652.24 Million | CA$1.28 Billion | — |