Olympia Financial Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Olympia Financial Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Olympia Financial Group Inc (OLY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.98x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$29.50 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities (CA$30.13 Million) in one year. Check Olympia Financial Group Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Olympia Financial Group Inc (2002–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Olympia Financial Group Inc from 2002 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Olympia Financial Group Inc across 24 annual periods. Check OLY cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Olympia Financial Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2002–2025)
Olympia Financial Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2002 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Olympia Financial Group Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Olympia Financial Group Inc cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.55x | CA$20.85 Million | CA$8.18 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2024 | 2.81x | CA$20.97 Million | CA$7.47 Million | ▲ +77.0% |
| 2023 | 1.59x | CA$18.95 Million | CA$11.95 Million | ▲ +125.6% |
| 2022 | 0.70x | CA$8.55 Million | CA$12.17 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2021 | 0.67x | CA$11.88 Million | CA$17.78 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2020 | 1.09x | CA$12.76 Million | CA$11.75 Million | ▲ +71.7% |
| 2019 | 0.63x | CA$8.85 Million | CA$14.00 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2018 | 1.26x | CA$10.61 Million | CA$8.43 Million | ▲ +210.6% |
| 2017 | 0.41x | CA$8.66 Million | CA$21.39 Million | ▲ +50.3% |
| 2016 | 0.27x | CA$4.62 Million | CA$17.12 Million | ▼ -54.0% |
| 2015 | 0.59x | CA$6.45 Million | CA$11.00 Million | ▲ +261.8% |
| 2014 | -0.36x | CA$-1.83 Million | CA$5.04 Million | ▼ -144.6% |
| 2013 | 0.81x | CA$12.40 Million | CA$15.25 Million | ▼ -52.6% |
| 2012 | 1.72x | CA$7.83 Million | CA$4.56 Million | ▲ +28.3% |
| 2011 | 1.34x | CA$5.27 Million | CA$3.94 Million | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2010 | 1.99x | CA$6.48 Million | CA$3.26 Million | ▲ +100.3% |
| 2009 | 0.99x | CA$4.95 Million | CA$4.98 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2008 | 1.53x | CA$4.55 Million | CA$2.97 Million | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2007 | 1.47x | CA$6.26 Million | CA$4.26 Million | ▼ -15.0% |
| 2006 | 1.73x | CA$3.18 Million | CA$1.84 Million | ▲ +36.2% |
| 2005 | 1.27x | CA$1.87 Million | CA$1.48 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2004 | 1.60x | CA$1.36 Million | CA$851.84K | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2003 | 1.63x | CA$646.97K | CA$396.06K | ▲ +199.5% |
| 2002 | 0.55x | CA$130.65K | CA$239.51K | — |