Olympia Financial Group Inc (OLY) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Olympia Financial Group Inc (OLY) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.98x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$29.50 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities (CA$30.13 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Olympia Financial Group Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Olympia Financial Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2002–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Olympia Financial Group Inc across 24 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Olympia Financial Group Inc generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Olympia Financial Group Inc (2002–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Olympia Financial Group Inc. Check Olympia Financial Group Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.55x | CA$20.85 Million | CA$8.18 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2024 | 2.81x | CA$20.97 Million | CA$7.47 Million | ▲ +77.0% |
| 2023 | 1.59x | CA$18.95 Million | CA$11.95 Million | ▲ +125.6% |
| 2022 | 0.70x | CA$8.55 Million | CA$12.17 Million | ▲ +5.2% |
| 2021 | 0.67x | CA$11.88 Million | CA$17.78 Million | ▼ -38.5% |
| 2020 | 1.09x | CA$12.76 Million | CA$11.75 Million | ▲ +71.7% |
| 2019 | 0.63x | CA$8.85 Million | CA$14.00 Million | ▼ -49.7% |
| 2018 | 1.26x | CA$10.61 Million | CA$8.43 Million | ▲ +210.6% |
| 2017 | 0.41x | CA$8.66 Million | CA$21.39 Million | ▲ +50.3% |
| 2016 | 0.27x | CA$4.62 Million | CA$17.12 Million | ▼ -54.0% |
| 2015 | 0.59x | CA$6.45 Million | CA$11.00 Million | ▲ +261.8% |
| 2014 | -0.36x | CA$-1.83 Million | CA$5.04 Million | ▼ -144.6% |
| 2013 | 0.81x | CA$12.40 Million | CA$15.25 Million | ▼ -52.6% |
| 2012 | 1.72x | CA$7.83 Million | CA$4.56 Million | ▲ +28.3% |
| 2011 | 1.34x | CA$5.27 Million | CA$3.94 Million | ▼ -32.9% |
| 2010 | 1.99x | CA$6.48 Million | CA$3.26 Million | ▲ +100.3% |
| 2009 | 0.99x | CA$4.95 Million | CA$4.98 Million | ▼ -35.1% |
| 2008 | 1.53x | CA$4.55 Million | CA$2.97 Million | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2007 | 1.47x | CA$6.26 Million | CA$4.26 Million | ▼ -15.0% |
| 2006 | 1.73x | CA$3.18 Million | CA$1.84 Million | ▲ +36.2% |
| 2005 | 1.27x | CA$1.87 Million | CA$1.48 Million | ▼ -20.5% |
| 2004 | 1.60x | CA$1.36 Million | CA$851.84K | ▼ -2.2% |
| 2003 | 1.63x | CA$646.97K | CA$396.06K | ▲ +199.5% |
| 2002 | 0.55x | CA$130.65K | CA$239.51K | — |