RB Global Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
RB Global cash flow-to-debt ratio. RB Global (RBA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$141.70 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$6.44 Billion) in one year. Check RB Global (RBA) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of RB Global (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of RB Global from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for RB Global across 29 annual periods. Check RBA cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
RB Global Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
RB Global cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for RB Global. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see RB Global cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.16x | CA$995.32 Million | CA$6.06 Billion | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | CA$886.97 Million | CA$6.09 Billion | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | CA$679.34 Million | CA$6.53 Billion | ▼ -64.5% |
| 2022 | 0.29x | CA$461.82 Million | CA$1.57 Billion | ▲ +137.0% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | CA$312.25 Million | CA$2.52 Billion | ▼ -39.8% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | CA$275.37 Million | CA$1.34 Billion | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2019 | 0.25x | CA$331.65 Million | CA$1.32 Billion | ▲ +122.2% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | CA$137.33 Million | CA$1.22 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | CA$150.60 Million | CA$1.27 Billion | ▼ -38.3% |
| 2016 | 0.19x | CA$174.01 Million | CA$907.70 Million | ▼ -59.0% |
| 2015 | 0.47x | CA$181.42 Million | CA$387.97 Million | ▲ +29.1% |
| 2014 | 0.36x | CA$149.36 Million | CA$412.29 Million | ▼ -12.3% |
| 2013 | 0.41x | CA$193.31 Million | CA$467.74 Million | ▲ +46.5% |
| 2012 | 0.28x | CA$134.26 Million | CA$475.97 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 2011 | 0.39x | CA$137.36 Million | CA$349.33 Million | ▲ +178.3% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | CA$41.36 Million | CA$292.69 Million | ▼ -70.5% |
| 2009 | 0.48x | CA$150.12 Million | CA$313.41 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2008 | 0.49x | CA$90.31 Million | CA$184.75 Million | ▲ +5.1% |
| 2007 | 0.47x | CA$110.39 Million | CA$237.39 Million | ▲ +15.8% |
| 2006 | 0.40x | CA$63.96 Million | CA$159.31 Million | ▼ -31.4% |
| 2005 | 0.59x | CA$88.40 Million | CA$151.09 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2004 | 0.41x | CA$63.23 Million | CA$153.15 Million | ▼ -14.6% |
| 2003 | 0.48x | CA$77.45 Million | CA$160.23 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 2002 | 0.36x | CA$47.04 Million | CA$129.76 Million | ▲ +156.5% |
| 2001 | 0.14x | CA$15.49 Million | CA$109.61 Million | ▼ -54.5% |
| 2000 | 0.31x | CA$37.15 Million | CA$119.59 Million | ▲ +8.9% |
| 1999 | 0.29x | CA$23.30 Million | CA$81.70 Million | ▼ -45.9% |
| 1998 | 0.53x | CA$25.50 Million | CA$48.40 Million | ▲ +321.5% |
| 1997 | 0.13x | CA$5.60 Million | CA$44.80 Million | — |