Total Energy Services Inc. (TOT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Total Energy Services Inc. (TOT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$61.82 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$446.23 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Total Energy Services Inc. to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Total Energy Services Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Total Energy Services Inc. across 28 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see TOT cash flow metrics.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Total Energy Services Inc. (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Total Energy Services Inc.. Check how high is Total Energy Services Inc.'s earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.49x | CA$195.06 Million | CA$398.79 Million | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2024 | 0.45x | CA$165.92 Million | CA$366.67 Million | ▲ +2.6% |
| 2023 | 0.44x | CA$145.95 Million | CA$330.90 Million | ▲ +9.7% |
| 2022 | 0.40x | CA$143.40 Million | CA$356.59 Million | ▲ +43.7% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | CA$89.58 Million | CA$320.08 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2020 | 0.25x | CA$86.12 Million | CA$338.59 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 2019 | 0.16x | CA$73.06 Million | CA$454.02 Million | ▼ -28.0% |
| 2018 | 0.22x | CA$115.70 Million | CA$517.55 Million | ▲ +80.6% |
| 2017 | 0.12x | CA$64.38 Million | CA$520.21 Million | ▼ -49.1% |
| 2016 | 0.24x | CA$38.49 Million | CA$158.30 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2015 | 0.28x | CA$41.08 Million | CA$149.04 Million | ▼ -28.1% |
| 2014 | 0.38x | CA$81.94 Million | CA$213.84 Million | ▲ +24.3% |
| 2013 | 0.31x | CA$54.91 Million | CA$178.17 Million | ▼ -57.8% |
| 2012 | 0.73x | CA$124.50 Million | CA$170.52 Million | ▲ +19.1% |
| 2011 | 0.61x | CA$97.64 Million | CA$159.30 Million | ▲ +175.0% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | CA$31.02 Million | CA$139.16 Million | ▼ -45.1% |
| 2009 | 0.41x | CA$32.15 Million | CA$79.14 Million | ▼ -22.6% |
| 2008 | 0.52x | CA$52.57 Million | CA$100.14 Million | ▲ +98.2% |
| 2007 | 0.26x | CA$24.85 Million | CA$93.82 Million | ▼ -71.8% |
| 2006 | 0.94x | CA$72.20 Million | CA$76.96 Million | ▲ +177.6% |
| 2005 | 0.34x | CA$29.61 Million | CA$87.62 Million | ▼ -5.4% |
| 2004 | 0.36x | CA$21.67 Million | CA$60.68 Million | ▲ +97.6% |
| 2003 | 0.18x | CA$9.18 Million | CA$50.80 Million | ▲ +41.6% |
| 2002 | 0.13x | CA$5.70 Million | CA$44.67 Million | ▼ -51.9% |
| 2001 | 0.27x | CA$10.58 Million | CA$39.89 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2000 | 0.29x | CA$9.78 Million | CA$33.88 Million | ▲ +130.9% |
| 1999 | 0.13x | CA$3.20 Million | CA$25.60 Million | ▲ +427.5% |
| 1998 | 0.02x | CA$500.00K | CA$21.10 Million | — |