Jourdeness Group Ltd (4190) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: 0.03x

Jourdeness Group Ltd (4190) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of NT$164.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (NT$5.16 Billion) in one year. See 4190 free cash flow debt coverage to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.03x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

NT$164.50 Million
TWD

Total Liabilities

NT$5.16 Billion
TWD

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Jourdeness Group Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2011–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Jourdeness Group Ltd across 15 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Jourdeness Group Ltd.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Jourdeness Group Ltd (2011–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Jourdeness Group Ltd. Check Jourdeness Group Ltd cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (TWD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.10x NT$511.35 Million NT$5.16 Billion ▲ +33.7%
2024 0.07x NT$416.51 Million NT$5.62 Billion ▼ -40.2%
2023 0.12x NT$715.79 Million NT$5.78 Billion ▼ -2.3%
2022 0.13x NT$747.12 Million NT$5.89 Billion ▼ -20.8%
2021 0.16x NT$985.77 Million NT$6.16 Billion ▼ -12.1%
2020 0.18x NT$902.73 Million NT$4.96 Billion ▲ +3.6%
2019 0.18x NT$781.89 Million NT$4.45 Billion ▲ +69.3%
2018 0.10x NT$429.41 Million NT$4.14 Billion ▼ -10.6%
2017 0.12x NT$420.29 Million NT$3.62 Billion ▲ +30.9%
2016 0.09x NT$226.79 Million NT$2.55 Billion ▼ -48.5%
2015 0.17x NT$313.90 Million NT$1.82 Billion ▼ -20.7%
2014 0.22x NT$426.19 Million NT$1.96 Billion ▼ -13.6%
2013 0.25x NT$483.13 Million NT$1.92 Billion ▼ -7.0%
2012 0.27x NT$480.87 Million NT$1.78 Billion ▲ +26.9%
2011 0.21x NT$326.31 Million NT$1.53 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.