Jourdeness Group Ltd (4190) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: 0.03x

Jourdeness Group Ltd (4190) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of NT$164.50 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (NT$5.16 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Jourdeness Group Ltd to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.03x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

NT$164.50 Million
TWD

Total Liabilities

NT$5.16 Billion
TWD

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Jourdeness Group Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2011–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Jourdeness Group Ltd across 15 annual periods. Also explore Jourdeness Group Ltd equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Jourdeness Group Ltd (2011–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Jourdeness Group Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Jourdeness Group Ltd market cap and net worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (TWD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.10x NT$511.35 Million NT$5.16 Billion ▲ +33.7%
2024 0.07x NT$416.51 Million NT$5.62 Billion ▼ -40.2%
2023 0.12x NT$715.79 Million NT$5.78 Billion ▼ -2.3%
2022 0.13x NT$747.12 Million NT$5.89 Billion ▼ -20.8%
2021 0.16x NT$985.77 Million NT$6.16 Billion ▼ -12.1%
2020 0.18x NT$902.73 Million NT$4.96 Billion ▲ +3.6%
2019 0.18x NT$781.89 Million NT$4.45 Billion ▲ +69.3%
2018 0.10x NT$429.41 Million NT$4.14 Billion ▼ -10.6%
2017 0.12x NT$420.29 Million NT$3.62 Billion ▲ +30.9%
2016 0.09x NT$226.79 Million NT$2.55 Billion ▼ -48.5%
2015 0.17x NT$313.90 Million NT$1.82 Billion ▼ -20.7%
2014 0.22x NT$426.19 Million NT$1.96 Billion ▼ -13.6%
2013 0.25x NT$483.13 Million NT$1.92 Billion ▼ -7.0%
2012 0.27x NT$480.87 Million NT$1.78 Billion ▲ +26.9%
2011 0.21x NT$326.31 Million NT$1.53 Billion —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.