Franbo Lines (2641) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: 0.05x

Franbo Lines (2641) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of NT$315.42 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (NT$6.22 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Franbo Lines to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.05x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

NT$315.42 Million
TWD

Total Liabilities

NT$6.22 Billion
TWD

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Franbo Lines Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2010–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Franbo Lines across 16 annual periods. Also explore 2641 net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Franbo Lines (2010–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Franbo Lines. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Franbo Lines market cap and net worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (TWD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.22x NT$1.35 Billion NT$6.22 Billion ▼ -6.3%
2024 0.23x NT$971.29 Million NT$4.20 Billion ▲ +32.5%
2023 0.17x NT$476.97 Million NT$2.73 Billion ▲ +30.5%
2022 0.13x NT$358.27 Million NT$2.68 Billion ▼ -43.9%
2021 0.24x NT$677.79 Million NT$2.84 Billion ▲ +110.7%
2020 0.11x NT$345.80 Million NT$3.05 Billion ▼ -1.0%
2019 0.11x NT$316.30 Million NT$2.77 Billion ▼ -20.6%
2018 0.14x NT$406.31 Million NT$2.82 Billion ▲ +9.5%
2017 0.13x NT$377.91 Million NT$2.88 Billion ▲ +106.0%
2016 0.06x NT$196.09 Million NT$3.07 Billion ▼ -23.3%
2015 0.08x NT$220.20 Million NT$2.65 Billion ▼ -20.2%
2014 0.10x NT$202.07 Million NT$1.94 Billion ▼ -29.2%
2013 0.15x NT$204.44 Million NT$1.39 Billion ▲ +17.6%
2012 0.13x NT$164.51 Million NT$1.31 Billion ▲ +21.5%
2011 0.10x NT$165.65 Million NT$1.61 Billion ▼ -13.1%
2010 0.12x NT$118.87 Million NT$1.00 Billion
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.