Yung Zip Chemical Ind Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Yung Zip Chemical Ind Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Yung Zip Chemical Ind Co Ltd (4102) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of NT$-12.27 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (NT$261.24 Million) in one year. Check Yung Zip Chemical Ind Co Ltd cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Yung Zip Chemical Ind Co Ltd (2002–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Yung Zip Chemical Ind Co Ltd from 2002 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Yung Zip Chemical Ind Co Ltd across 22 annual periods. Check Yung Zip Chemical Ind Co Ltd investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Yung Zip Chemical Ind Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2002–2024)
Yung Zip Chemical Ind Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2002 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Yung Zip Chemical Ind Co Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see 4102 cash flow metrics.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (TWD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.53x | NT$118.67 Million | NT$222.61 Million | ▲ +55.6% |
| 2023 | 0.34x | NT$96.76 Million | NT$282.49 Million | ▲ +28.0% |
| 2022 | 0.27x | NT$92.55 Million | NT$345.94 Million | ▲ +29.2% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | NT$73.27 Million | NT$353.87 Million | ▲ +118.9% |
| 2020 | 0.09x | NT$36.07 Million | NT$381.32 Million | ▼ -43.2% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | NT$30.76 Million | NT$184.84 Million | ▲ +80.2% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | NT$15.45 Million | NT$167.34 Million | ▲ +171.0% |
| 2017 | -0.13x | NT$-15.85 Million | NT$121.94 Million | ▼ -166.5% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | NT$19.54 Million | NT$99.92 Million | ▲ +359.9% |
| 2015 | 0.04x | NT$5.36 Million | NT$126.13 Million | ▼ -87.4% |
| 2013 | 0.34x | NT$25.94 Million | NT$77.02 Million | ▼ -75.2% |
| 2012 | 1.36x | NT$100.80 Million | NT$74.23 Million | ▲ +313.4% |
| 2011 | 0.33x | NT$45.51 Million | NT$138.54 Million | ▼ -76.8% |
| 2010 | 1.41x | NT$168.59 Million | NT$119.22 Million | ▼ -3.8% |
| 2009 | 1.47x | NT$163.08 Million | NT$110.95 Million | ▲ +204.9% |
| 2008 | 0.48x | NT$45.02 Million | NT$93.39 Million | ▲ +577.9% |
| 2007 | 0.07x | NT$5.38 Million | NT$75.66 Million | ▼ -93.8% |
| 2006 | 1.14x | NT$61.64 Million | NT$53.97 Million | ▲ +56.8% |
| 2005 | 0.73x | NT$32.66 Million | NT$44.83 Million | ▲ +39.3% |
| 2004 | 0.52x | NT$41.38 Million | NT$79.12 Million | ▼ -17.2% |
| 2003 | 0.63x | NT$70.09 Million | NT$110.91 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 2002 | 0.49x | NT$31.98 Million | NT$65.49 Million | — |