Ate Energy International Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of June 2026: -0.02x

Ate Energy International Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Ate Energy International Co Ltd (6179) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of NT$-198.81 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (NT$10.52 Billion) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Ate Energy International Co Ltd to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.02x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

NT$-198.81 Million
TWD

Total Liabilities

NT$10.52 Billion
TWD

Data as of

Jun 2026
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Ate Energy International Co Ltd (2017–2025)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Ate Energy International Co Ltd from 2017 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Ate Energy International Co Ltd across 9 annual periods. Check Ate Energy International Co Ltd cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

Ate Energy International Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2017–2025)

Ate Energy International Co Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2017 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ate Energy International Co Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see 6179 cash generation efficiency.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (TWD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -0.21x NT$-1.69 Billion NT$7.90 Billion ▼ -24.7%
2024 -0.17x NT$-1.01 Billion NT$5.88 Billion ▼ -883.9%
2023 -0.02x NT$-55.68 Million NT$3.19 Billion ▼ -0.8%
2022 -0.02x NT$-55.95 Million NT$3.23 Billion ▲ +92.7%
2021 -0.24x NT$-538.99 Million NT$2.26 Billion ▼ -1431.9%
2020 -0.02x NT$-40.31 Million NT$2.59 Billion ▲ +59.7%
2019 -0.04x NT$-74.09 Million NT$1.92 Billion ▲ +91.6%
2018 -0.46x NT$-620.28 Million NT$1.35 Billion ▼ -167.5%
2017 0.68x NT$554.57 Million NT$811.90 Million —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.