Y-S Electronic Co Ltd (6418) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: 0.02x

Y-S Electronic Co Ltd (6418) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of NT$9.90 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (NT$462.91 Million) in one year. See Y-S Electronic Co Ltd free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.02x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

NT$9.90 Million
TWD

Total Liabilities

NT$462.91 Million
TWD

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Y-S Electronic Co Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2010–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Y-S Electronic Co Ltd across 14 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Y-S Electronic Co Ltd to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Y-S Electronic Co Ltd (2010–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Y-S Electronic Co Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Y-S Electronic Co Ltd market cap and net worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (TWD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 0.09x NT$42.13 Million NT$462.91 Million ▲ +12.4%
2024 0.08x NT$39.87 Million NT$492.28 Million ▼ -54.1%
2023 0.18x NT$88.01 Million NT$498.55 Million ▲ +32.1%
2022 0.13x NT$72.28 Million NT$540.66 Million ▲ +271.6%
2021 0.04x NT$21.98 Million NT$610.79 Million ▼ -75.2%
2020 0.15x NT$33.21 Million NT$228.73 Million ▼ -53.4%
2019 0.31x NT$76.99 Million NT$247.15 Million ▲ +785.0%
2018 0.04x NT$9.05 Million NT$257.02 Million ▼ -80.7%
2017 0.18x NT$58.44 Million NT$320.55 Million ▼ -21.1%
2016 0.23x NT$71.92 Million NT$311.28 Million ▲ +21.6%
2015 0.19x NT$65.55 Million NT$344.87 Million ▲ +9.5%
2014 0.17x NT$70.10 Million NT$403.99 Million ▼ -36.5%
2011 0.27x NT$58.99 Million NT$215.99 Million ▼ -28.7%
2010 0.38x NT$75.14 Million NT$196.06 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.