Belmont Resources Inc (BEA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Belmont Resources Inc (BEA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -2.17x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-295.73K could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities (CA$136.26K) in one year. See how much free cash does Belmont Resources Inc generate to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Belmont Resources Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Belmont Resources Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore BEA shareholders equity momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Belmont Resources Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Belmont Resources Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see BEA market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -8.51x | CA$-893.97K | CA$105.11K | ▼ -1878.8% |
| 2024 | -0.43x | CA$-266.94K | CA$621.05K | ▲ +72.6% |
| 2023 | -1.57x | CA$-543.25K | CA$346.42K | ▼ -193.7% |
| 2022 | -0.53x | CA$-239.01K | CA$447.63K | ▲ +66.1% |
| 2021 | -1.57x | CA$-537.86K | CA$341.94K | ▼ -89.5% |
| 2020 | -0.83x | CA$-408.23K | CA$491.77K | ▲ +77.9% |
| 2019 | -3.75x | CA$-796.80K | CA$212.37K | ▼ -191.5% |
| 2018 | -1.29x | CA$-494.19K | CA$383.92K | ▲ +27.6% |
| 2017 | -1.78x | CA$-469.13K | CA$263.97K | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2016 | -1.18x | CA$-179.92K | CA$152.10K | ▲ +29.6% |
| 2015 | -1.68x | CA$-160.32K | CA$95.36K | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2014 | -12.74x | CA$-294.37K | CA$23.10K | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2013 | -15.32x | CA$-409.83K | CA$26.76K | ▼ -47.2% |
| 2012 | -10.41x | CA$-303.41K | CA$29.16K | ▼ -443.4% |
| 2011 | -1.92x | CA$-267.99K | CA$139.94K | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2010 | -4.49x | CA$-235.19K | CA$52.34K | ▼ -52.0% |
| 2009 | -2.96x | CA$-249.27K | CA$84.31K | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2008 | -4.36x | CA$-293.49K | CA$67.33K | ▼ -33.6% |
| 2007 | -3.26x | CA$-283.98K | CA$87.05K | ▼ -191.2% |
| 2006 | -1.12x | CA$-222.58K | CA$198.65K | ▲ +44.6% |
| 2005 | -2.02x | CA$-219.20K | CA$108.45K | ▲ +27.0% |
| 2004 | -2.77x | CA$-229.92K | CA$83.05K | ▼ -513.7% |
| 2003 | -0.45x | CA$-102.34K | CA$226.88K | ▲ +69.7% |
| 2002 | -1.49x | CA$-269.79K | CA$180.95K | ▲ +21.3% |
| 2001 | -1.90x | CA$-539.65K | CA$284.68K | ▲ +86.0% |
| 2000 | -13.56x | CA$-390.27K | CA$28.77K | ▼ -6709.5% |
| 1999 | -0.20x | CA$-229.95K | CA$1.15 Million | ▲ +94.6% |
| 1998 | -3.66x | CA$-195.17K | CA$53.27K | — |