Belmont Resources Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Belmont Resources Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Belmont Resources Inc (BEA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.97x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-109.89K could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities (CA$113.78K) in one year. Check BEA cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Belmont Resources Inc (1998–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Belmont Resources Inc from 1998 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Belmont Resources Inc across 29 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Belmont Resources Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Belmont Resources Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2026)
Belmont Resources Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Belmont Resources Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Belmont Resources Inc (BEA) cash conversion ratio.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -4.23x | CA$-600.93K | CA$141.99K | ▲ +50.2% |
| 2025 | -8.51x | CA$-893.97K | CA$105.11K | ▼ -1878.8% |
| 2024 | -0.43x | CA$-266.94K | CA$621.05K | ▲ +72.6% |
| 2023 | -1.57x | CA$-543.25K | CA$346.42K | ▼ -193.7% |
| 2022 | -0.53x | CA$-239.01K | CA$447.63K | ▲ +66.1% |
| 2021 | -1.57x | CA$-537.86K | CA$341.94K | ▼ -89.5% |
| 2020 | -0.83x | CA$-408.23K | CA$491.77K | ▲ +77.9% |
| 2019 | -3.75x | CA$-796.80K | CA$212.37K | ▼ -191.5% |
| 2018 | -1.29x | CA$-494.19K | CA$383.92K | ▲ +27.6% |
| 2017 | -1.78x | CA$-469.13K | CA$263.97K | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2016 | -1.18x | CA$-179.92K | CA$152.10K | ▲ +29.6% |
| 2015 | -1.68x | CA$-160.32K | CA$95.36K | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2014 | -12.74x | CA$-294.37K | CA$23.10K | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2013 | -15.32x | CA$-409.83K | CA$26.76K | ▼ -47.2% |
| 2012 | -10.41x | CA$-303.41K | CA$29.16K | ▼ -443.4% |
| 2011 | -1.92x | CA$-267.99K | CA$139.94K | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2010 | -4.49x | CA$-235.19K | CA$52.34K | ▼ -52.0% |
| 2009 | -2.96x | CA$-249.27K | CA$84.31K | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2008 | -4.36x | CA$-293.49K | CA$67.33K | ▼ -33.6% |
| 2007 | -3.26x | CA$-283.98K | CA$87.05K | ▼ -191.2% |
| 2006 | -1.12x | CA$-222.58K | CA$198.65K | ▲ +44.6% |
| 2005 | -2.02x | CA$-219.20K | CA$108.45K | ▲ +27.0% |
| 2004 | -2.77x | CA$-229.92K | CA$83.05K | ▼ -513.7% |
| 2003 | -0.45x | CA$-102.34K | CA$226.88K | ▲ +69.7% |
| 2002 | -1.49x | CA$-269.79K | CA$180.95K | ▲ +21.3% |
| 2001 | -1.90x | CA$-539.65K | CA$284.68K | ▲ +86.0% |
| 2000 | -13.56x | CA$-390.27K | CA$28.77K | ▼ -6709.5% |
| 1999 | -0.20x | CA$-229.95K | CA$1.15 Million | ▲ +94.6% |
| 1998 | -3.66x | CA$-195.17K | CA$53.27K | — |