Belmont Resources Inc (BEA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Belmont Resources Inc (BEA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -2.17x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-295.73K could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities (CA$136.26K) in one year. Explore Belmont Resources Inc (BEA) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Belmont Resources Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Belmont Resources Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore Belmont Resources Inc asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Belmont Resources Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Belmont Resources Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Belmont Resources Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -8.51x | CA$-893.97K | CA$105.11K | ▼ -1878.8% |
| 2024 | -0.43x | CA$-266.94K | CA$621.05K | ▲ +72.6% |
| 2023 | -1.57x | CA$-543.25K | CA$346.42K | ▼ -193.7% |
| 2022 | -0.53x | CA$-239.01K | CA$447.63K | ▲ +66.1% |
| 2021 | -1.57x | CA$-537.86K | CA$341.94K | ▼ -89.5% |
| 2020 | -0.83x | CA$-408.23K | CA$491.77K | ▲ +77.9% |
| 2019 | -3.75x | CA$-796.80K | CA$212.37K | ▼ -191.5% |
| 2018 | -1.29x | CA$-494.19K | CA$383.92K | ▲ +27.6% |
| 2017 | -1.78x | CA$-469.13K | CA$263.97K | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2016 | -1.18x | CA$-179.92K | CA$152.10K | ▲ +29.6% |
| 2015 | -1.68x | CA$-160.32K | CA$95.36K | ▲ +86.8% |
| 2014 | -12.74x | CA$-294.37K | CA$23.10K | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2013 | -15.32x | CA$-409.83K | CA$26.76K | ▼ -47.2% |
| 2012 | -10.41x | CA$-303.41K | CA$29.16K | ▼ -443.4% |
| 2011 | -1.92x | CA$-267.99K | CA$139.94K | ▲ +57.4% |
| 2010 | -4.49x | CA$-235.19K | CA$52.34K | ▼ -52.0% |
| 2009 | -2.96x | CA$-249.27K | CA$84.31K | ▲ +32.2% |
| 2008 | -4.36x | CA$-293.49K | CA$67.33K | ▼ -33.6% |
| 2007 | -3.26x | CA$-283.98K | CA$87.05K | ▼ -191.2% |
| 2006 | -1.12x | CA$-222.58K | CA$198.65K | ▲ +44.6% |
| 2005 | -2.02x | CA$-219.20K | CA$108.45K | ▲ +27.0% |
| 2004 | -2.77x | CA$-229.92K | CA$83.05K | ▼ -513.7% |
| 2003 | -0.45x | CA$-102.34K | CA$226.88K | ▲ +69.7% |
| 2002 | -1.49x | CA$-269.79K | CA$180.95K | ▲ +21.3% |
| 2001 | -1.90x | CA$-539.65K | CA$284.68K | ▲ +86.0% |
| 2000 | -13.56x | CA$-390.27K | CA$28.77K | ▼ -6709.5% |
| 1999 | -0.20x | CA$-229.95K | CA$1.15 Million | ▲ +94.6% |
| 1998 | -3.66x | CA$-195.17K | CA$53.27K | — |