Belmont Resources Inc (BEA) — Net Asset Quality Index
Belmont Resources Inc (BEA) has a Net Asset Quality Index of 95.9% as of October 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$3.34 Million minus total liabilities of CA$136.26K yields net assets of CA$3.20 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See BEA defensive interval ratio to measure how many days the company can operate on defensive assets alone.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Belmont Resources Inc Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1998–2025)
This chart shows how Belmont Resources Inc's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 28 annual periods from 1998 to 2025. As of October 2025, the index stands at 95.9%, representing net assets of CA$3.20 Million against total assets of CA$3.34 Million CAD. Explore BEA cash flow conversion to assess how effectively this company generates cash.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Belmont Resources Inc (1998–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Belmont Resources Inc from 1998 to 2025, covering 28 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see BEA company net worth.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 95.7% | CA$2.36 Million | CA$2.46 Million | CA$105.11K | ▲ +14.7 pp |
| 2024 | 81.1% | CA$2.66 Million | CA$3.28 Million | CA$621.05K | ▼ -6.0 pp |
| 2023 | 87.0% | CA$2.33 Million | CA$2.67 Million | CA$346.42K | ▲ +3.8 pp |
| 2022 | 83.2% | CA$2.22 Million | CA$2.67 Million | CA$447.63K | ▼ -1.3 pp |
| 2021 | 84.6% | CA$1.87 Million | CA$2.21 Million | CA$341.94K | ▲ +19.1 pp |
| 2020 | 65.5% | CA$932.27K | CA$1.42 Million | CA$491.77K | ▼ -17.7 pp |
| 2019 | 83.2% | CA$1.05 Million | CA$1.26 Million | CA$212.37K | ▲ +28.0 pp |
| 2018 | 55.1% | CA$471.65K | CA$855.57K | CA$383.92K | ▲ +44.0 pp |
| 2017 | 11.2% | CA$33.16K | CA$297.13K | CA$263.97K | ▲ +99.0 pp |
| 2016 | -87.8% | CA$-71.11K | CA$80.99K | CA$152.10K | ▼ -156.3 pp |
| 2015 | 68.5% | CA$207.59K | CA$302.94K | CA$95.36K | ▼ -29.4 pp |
| 2014 | 97.9% | CA$1.07 Million | CA$1.09 Million | CA$23.10K | ▼ -0.2 pp |
| 2013 | 98.1% | CA$1.35 Million | CA$1.38 Million | CA$26.76K | ▲ +0.2 pp |
| 2012 | 97.9% | CA$1.37 Million | CA$1.40 Million | CA$29.16K | ▲ +5.6 pp |
| 2011 | 92.3% | CA$1.68 Million | CA$1.82 Million | CA$139.94K | ▼ -4.3 pp |
| 2010 | 96.6% | CA$1.49 Million | CA$1.54 Million | CA$52.34K | ▲ +2.0 pp |
| 2009 | 94.6% | CA$1.49 Million | CA$1.57 Million | CA$84.31K | ▼ -2.2 pp |
| 2008 | 96.8% | CA$2.06 Million | CA$2.13 Million | CA$67.33K | ▲ +3.4 pp |
| 2007 | 93.4% | CA$1.24 Million | CA$1.33 Million | CA$87.05K | ▲ +46.5 pp |
| 2006 | 47.0% | CA$175.97K | CA$374.62K | CA$198.65K | ▼ -35.8 pp |
| 2005 | 82.8% | CA$521.50K | CA$629.94K | CA$108.45K | ▼ -13.4 pp |
| 2004 | 96.2% | CA$2.12 Million | CA$2.21 Million | CA$83.05K | ▲ +3.3 pp |
| 2003 | 92.9% | CA$2.98 Million | CA$3.21 Million | CA$226.88K | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2002 | 94.9% | CA$3.39 Million | CA$3.57 Million | CA$180.95K | ▲ +3.1 pp |
| 2001 | 91.8% | CA$3.19 Million | CA$3.48 Million | CA$284.68K | ▼ -7.5 pp |
| 2000 | 99.3% | CA$4.12 Million | CA$4.15 Million | CA$28.77K | ▲ +9.3 pp |
| 1999 | 90.0% | CA$10.44 Million | CA$11.60 Million | CA$1.15 Million | ▼ -9.1 pp |
| 1998 | 99.1% | CA$6.12 Million | CA$6.17 Million | CA$53.27K | — |