Blockchaink2 Corp (BITK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Blockchaink2 Corp (BITK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.12x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-181.89K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.58 Million) in one year. See BITK FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Blockchaink2 Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Blockchaink2 Corp across 29 annual periods. Also explore BITK year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Blockchaink2 Corp (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Blockchaink2 Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Blockchaink2 Corp market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.14x | CA$-305.08K | CA$2.24 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2024 | -0.67x | CA$-858.20K | CA$1.28 Million | ▼ -239.5% |
| 2023 | -0.20x | CA$-170.89K | CA$863.97K | ▲ +80.9% |
| 2022 | -1.03x | CA$-1.00 Million | CA$968.85K | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2021 | -2.07x | CA$-748.36K | CA$362.25K | ▲ +71.9% |
| 2020 | -7.35x | CA$-793.49K | CA$107.95K | ▲ +55.6% |
| 2019 | -16.56x | CA$-893.26K | CA$53.94K | ▼ -446.6% |
| 2018 | -3.03x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$368.14K | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2017 | -3.29x | CA$-373.37K | CA$113.38K | ▼ -57.6% |
| 2016 | -2.09x | CA$-284.17K | CA$136.01K | ▲ +62.7% |
| 2015 | -5.60x | CA$-409.33K | CA$73.16K | ▼ -176.7% |
| 2014 | -2.02x | CA$-485.49K | CA$240.09K | ▼ -826.8% |
| 2013 | -0.22x | CA$-235.10K | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2012 | -5.38x | CA$-1.36 Million | CA$252.86K | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2011 | -5.41x | CA$-1.02 Million | CA$188.25K | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2010 | -10.38x | CA$-4.23 Million | CA$407.00K | ▲ +57.5% |
| 2009 | -24.46x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$41.12K | ▼ -791.4% |
| 2008 | -2.74x | CA$-3.28 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2007 | -3.24x | CA$-1.62 Million | CA$500.09K | ▼ -29.9% |
| 2006 | -2.49x | CA$-521.04K | CA$209.09K | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2005 | -65.97x | CA$-4.10 Million | CA$62.15K | ▼ -1854.6% |
| 2004 | -3.38x | CA$-4.69 Million | CA$1.39 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2003 | -31.00x | CA$-3.30 Million | CA$106.47K | ▼ -11637.8% |
| 2002 | -0.26x | CA$-148.94K | CA$563.98K | ▼ -146.9% |
| 2001 | 0.56x | CA$171.82K | CA$305.18K | ▲ +139.7% |
| 2000 | -1.42x | CA$-671.64K | CA$473.66K | ▲ +95.4% |
| 1999 | -30.94x | CA$-727.92K | CA$23.53K | ▼ -955851.0% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | CA$-1.88K | CA$580.32K | ▲ +96.6% |
| 1997 | -0.10x | CA$-48.63K | CA$510.88K | — |