Blockchaink2 Corp (BITK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Blockchaink2 Corp (BITK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.12x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-181.89K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.58 Million) in one year. Explore BITK long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Blockchaink2 Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Blockchaink2 Corp across 29 annual periods. Also explore BITK total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Blockchaink2 Corp (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Blockchaink2 Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see BITK stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.14x | CA$-305.08K | CA$2.24 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2024 | -0.67x | CA$-858.20K | CA$1.28 Million | ▼ -239.5% |
| 2023 | -0.20x | CA$-170.89K | CA$863.97K | ▲ +80.9% |
| 2022 | -1.03x | CA$-1.00 Million | CA$968.85K | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2021 | -2.07x | CA$-748.36K | CA$362.25K | ▲ +71.9% |
| 2020 | -7.35x | CA$-793.49K | CA$107.95K | ▲ +55.6% |
| 2019 | -16.56x | CA$-893.26K | CA$53.94K | ▼ -446.6% |
| 2018 | -3.03x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$368.14K | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2017 | -3.29x | CA$-373.37K | CA$113.38K | ▼ -57.6% |
| 2016 | -2.09x | CA$-284.17K | CA$136.01K | ▲ +62.7% |
| 2015 | -5.60x | CA$-409.33K | CA$73.16K | ▼ -176.7% |
| 2014 | -2.02x | CA$-485.49K | CA$240.09K | ▼ -826.8% |
| 2013 | -0.22x | CA$-235.10K | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2012 | -5.38x | CA$-1.36 Million | CA$252.86K | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2011 | -5.41x | CA$-1.02 Million | CA$188.25K | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2010 | -10.38x | CA$-4.23 Million | CA$407.00K | ▲ +57.5% |
| 2009 | -24.46x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$41.12K | ▼ -791.4% |
| 2008 | -2.74x | CA$-3.28 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2007 | -3.24x | CA$-1.62 Million | CA$500.09K | ▼ -29.9% |
| 2006 | -2.49x | CA$-521.04K | CA$209.09K | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2005 | -65.97x | CA$-4.10 Million | CA$62.15K | ▼ -1854.6% |
| 2004 | -3.38x | CA$-4.69 Million | CA$1.39 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2003 | -31.00x | CA$-3.30 Million | CA$106.47K | ▼ -11637.8% |
| 2002 | -0.26x | CA$-148.94K | CA$563.98K | ▼ -146.9% |
| 2001 | 0.56x | CA$171.82K | CA$305.18K | ▲ +139.7% |
| 2000 | -1.42x | CA$-671.64K | CA$473.66K | ▲ +95.4% |
| 1999 | -30.94x | CA$-727.92K | CA$23.53K | ▼ -955851.0% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | CA$-1.88K | CA$580.32K | ▲ +96.6% |
| 1997 | -0.10x | CA$-48.63K | CA$510.88K | — |