Blockchaink2 Corp (BITK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Blockchaink2 Corp (BITK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.12x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-181.89K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.58 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Blockchaink2 Corp to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Blockchaink2 Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1997–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Blockchaink2 Corp across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Blockchaink2 Corp (BITK) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Blockchaink2 Corp (1997–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Blockchaink2 Corp. Check BITK operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.14x | CA$-305.08K | CA$2.24 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2024 | -0.67x | CA$-858.20K | CA$1.28 Million | ▼ -239.5% |
| 2023 | -0.20x | CA$-170.89K | CA$863.97K | ▲ +80.9% |
| 2022 | -1.03x | CA$-1.00 Million | CA$968.85K | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2021 | -2.07x | CA$-748.36K | CA$362.25K | ▲ +71.9% |
| 2020 | -7.35x | CA$-793.49K | CA$107.95K | ▲ +55.6% |
| 2019 | -16.56x | CA$-893.26K | CA$53.94K | ▼ -446.6% |
| 2018 | -3.03x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$368.14K | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2017 | -3.29x | CA$-373.37K | CA$113.38K | ▼ -57.6% |
| 2016 | -2.09x | CA$-284.17K | CA$136.01K | ▲ +62.7% |
| 2015 | -5.60x | CA$-409.33K | CA$73.16K | ▼ -176.7% |
| 2014 | -2.02x | CA$-485.49K | CA$240.09K | ▼ -826.8% |
| 2013 | -0.22x | CA$-235.10K | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2012 | -5.38x | CA$-1.36 Million | CA$252.86K | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2011 | -5.41x | CA$-1.02 Million | CA$188.25K | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2010 | -10.38x | CA$-4.23 Million | CA$407.00K | ▲ +57.5% |
| 2009 | -24.46x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$41.12K | ▼ -791.4% |
| 2008 | -2.74x | CA$-3.28 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2007 | -3.24x | CA$-1.62 Million | CA$500.09K | ▼ -29.9% |
| 2006 | -2.49x | CA$-521.04K | CA$209.09K | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2005 | -65.97x | CA$-4.10 Million | CA$62.15K | ▼ -1854.6% |
| 2004 | -3.38x | CA$-4.69 Million | CA$1.39 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2003 | -31.00x | CA$-3.30 Million | CA$106.47K | ▼ -11637.8% |
| 2002 | -0.26x | CA$-148.94K | CA$563.98K | ▼ -146.9% |
| 2001 | 0.56x | CA$171.82K | CA$305.18K | ▲ +139.7% |
| 2000 | -1.42x | CA$-671.64K | CA$473.66K | ▲ +95.4% |
| 1999 | -30.94x | CA$-727.92K | CA$23.53K | ▼ -955851.0% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | CA$-1.88K | CA$580.32K | ▲ +96.6% |
| 1997 | -0.10x | CA$-48.63K | CA$510.88K | — |