Blockchaink2 Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Blockchaink2 Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Blockchaink2 Corp (BITK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.12x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of CA$-181.89K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (CA$1.58 Million) in one year. Check Blockchaink2 Corp cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Blockchaink2 Corp (1997–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Blockchaink2 Corp from 1997 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Blockchaink2 Corp across 29 annual periods. Check BITK cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Blockchaink2 Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1997–2025)
Blockchaink2 Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1997 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Blockchaink2 Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Blockchaink2 Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (CAD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.14x | CA$-305.08K | CA$2.24 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2024 | -0.67x | CA$-858.20K | CA$1.28 Million | ▼ -239.5% |
| 2023 | -0.20x | CA$-170.89K | CA$863.97K | ▲ +80.9% |
| 2022 | -1.03x | CA$-1.00 Million | CA$968.85K | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2021 | -2.07x | CA$-748.36K | CA$362.25K | ▲ +71.9% |
| 2020 | -7.35x | CA$-793.49K | CA$107.95K | ▲ +55.6% |
| 2019 | -16.56x | CA$-893.26K | CA$53.94K | ▼ -446.6% |
| 2018 | -3.03x | CA$-1.12 Million | CA$368.14K | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2017 | -3.29x | CA$-373.37K | CA$113.38K | ▼ -57.6% |
| 2016 | -2.09x | CA$-284.17K | CA$136.01K | ▲ +62.7% |
| 2015 | -5.60x | CA$-409.33K | CA$73.16K | ▼ -176.7% |
| 2014 | -2.02x | CA$-485.49K | CA$240.09K | ▼ -826.8% |
| 2013 | -0.22x | CA$-235.10K | CA$1.08 Million | ▲ +95.9% |
| 2012 | -5.38x | CA$-1.36 Million | CA$252.86K | ▲ +0.6% |
| 2011 | -5.41x | CA$-1.02 Million | CA$188.25K | ▲ +47.9% |
| 2010 | -10.38x | CA$-4.23 Million | CA$407.00K | ▲ +57.5% |
| 2009 | -24.46x | CA$-1.01 Million | CA$41.12K | ▼ -791.4% |
| 2008 | -2.74x | CA$-3.28 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▲ +15.2% |
| 2007 | -3.24x | CA$-1.62 Million | CA$500.09K | ▼ -29.9% |
| 2006 | -2.49x | CA$-521.04K | CA$209.09K | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2005 | -65.97x | CA$-4.10 Million | CA$62.15K | ▼ -1854.6% |
| 2004 | -3.38x | CA$-4.69 Million | CA$1.39 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2003 | -31.00x | CA$-3.30 Million | CA$106.47K | ▼ -11637.8% |
| 2002 | -0.26x | CA$-148.94K | CA$563.98K | ▼ -146.9% |
| 2001 | 0.56x | CA$171.82K | CA$305.18K | ▲ +139.7% |
| 2000 | -1.42x | CA$-671.64K | CA$473.66K | ▲ +95.4% |
| 1999 | -30.94x | CA$-727.92K | CA$23.53K | ▼ -955851.0% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | CA$-1.88K | CA$580.32K | ▲ +96.6% |
| 1997 | -0.10x | CA$-48.63K | CA$510.88K | — |