Blockchaink2 Corp Net Asset Quality Index
Blockchaink2 Corp net asset quality index. Blockchaink2 Corp (BITK) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -822.6% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$170.88K minus total liabilities of CA$1.58 Million yields net assets of CA$-1.41 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. See BITK net asset value for net asset value and shareholders' equity analysis.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Net Asset Quality Index of Blockchaink2 Corp (1997–2025)
Net asset quality index of Blockchaink2 Corp from 1997 to 2025. This chart shows how Blockchaink2 Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 29 annual periods from 1997 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at -822.6%, representing net assets of CA$-1.41 Million against total assets of CA$170.88K CAD. Check BITK strategic asset allocation to assess the company's strategic physical and investment asset allocation.
Blockchaink2 Corp Net Asset Quality Index by Year (1997–2025)
Blockchaink2 Corp net asset quality index by year from 1997 to 2025. The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Blockchaink2 Corp from 1997 to 2025, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For live market cap and overall valuation, see Blockchaink2 Corp stock valuation.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -544.5% | CA$-1.89 Million | CA$346.90K | CA$2.24 Million | ▼ -386.9 pp |
| 2024 | -157.6% | CA$-781.87K | CA$496.11K | CA$1.28 Million | ▼ -183.2 pp |
| 2023 | 25.6% | CA$297.78K | CA$1.16 Million | CA$863.97K | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2022 | 28.4% | CA$384.79K | CA$1.35 Million | CA$968.85K | ▼ -52.2 pp |
| 2021 | 80.6% | CA$1.51 Million | CA$1.87 Million | CA$362.25K | ▼ -15.5 pp |
| 2020 | 96.1% | CA$2.69 Million | CA$2.79 Million | CA$107.95K | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2019 | 98.2% | CA$2.90 Million | CA$2.95 Million | CA$53.94K | ▲ +7.6 pp |
| 2018 | 90.6% | CA$3.55 Million | CA$3.92 Million | CA$368.14K | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2017 | 89.3% | CA$949.37K | CA$1.06 Million | CA$113.38K | ▲ +55.2 pp |
| 2016 | 34.1% | CA$70.50K | CA$206.50K | CA$136.01K | ▼ -50.9 pp |
| 2015 | 85.1% | CA$416.34K | CA$489.49K | CA$73.16K | ▲ +6.7 pp |
| 2014 | 78.3% | CA$866.92K | CA$1.11 Million | CA$240.09K | ▼ -14.3 pp |
| 2013 | 92.6% | CA$13.50 Million | CA$14.57 Million | CA$1.08 Million | ▼ -5.7 pp |
| 2012 | 98.3% | CA$14.38 Million | CA$14.63 Million | CA$252.86K | ▲ +16.5 pp |
| 2011 | 81.8% | CA$843.72K | CA$1.03 Million | CA$188.25K | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2010 | 81.9% | CA$1.84 Million | CA$2.25 Million | CA$407.00K | ▼ -16.1 pp |
| 2009 | 98.0% | CA$2.04 Million | CA$2.08 Million | CA$41.12K | ▲ +26.8 pp |
| 2008 | 71.2% | CA$2.95 Million | CA$4.15 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▼ -11.6 pp |
| 2007 | 82.8% | CA$2.41 Million | CA$2.91 Million | CA$500.09K | ▼ -6.1 pp |
| 2006 | 88.9% | CA$1.68 Million | CA$1.88 Million | CA$209.09K | ▼ -9.2 pp |
| 2005 | 98.1% | CA$3.27 Million | CA$3.33 Million | CA$62.15K | ▲ +33.0 pp |
| 2004 | 65.1% | CA$2.59 Million | CA$3.98 Million | CA$1.39 Million | ▼ -31.4 pp |
| 2003 | 96.5% | CA$2.90 Million | CA$3.01 Million | CA$106.47K | ▲ +153.7 pp |
| 2002 | -57.3% | CA$-205.38K | CA$358.60K | CA$563.98K | ▼ -114.0 pp |
| 2001 | 56.7% | CA$399.32K | CA$704.50K | CA$305.18K | ▲ +52.8 pp |
| 2000 | 3.9% | CA$19.13K | CA$492.79K | CA$473.66K | ▼ -95.4 pp |
| 1999 | 99.2% | CA$3.07 Million | CA$3.09 Million | CA$23.53K | ▲ +3300.8 pp |
| 1998 | -3201.6% | CA$-562.74K | CA$17.58K | CA$580.32K | ▼ -926.6 pp |
| 1997 | -2275.0% | CA$-489.37K | CA$21.51K | CA$510.88K | — |