Blockchaink2 Corp (BITK) — Net Asset Quality Index
Blockchaink2 Corp (BITK) has a Net Asset Quality Index of -822.6% as of December 2025. This metric measures the proportion of total assets financed by shareholders' equity — total assets of CA$170.88K minus total liabilities of CA$1.58 Million yields net assets of CA$-1.41 Million. A higher index indicates a stronger, lower-leverage balance sheet. Check Blockchaink2 Corp asset resilience ratio to evaluate the company's liquid asset resilience ratio.
Quality Index
Net Assets
Total Assets
Total Liabilities
Blockchaink2 Corp Net Asset Quality Index Over Time (1997–2025)
This chart shows how Blockchaink2 Corp's Net Asset Quality Index has evolved across 29 annual periods from 1997 to 2025. As of December 2025, the index stands at -822.6%, representing net assets of CA$-1.41 Million against total assets of CA$170.88K CAD. See Blockchaink2 Corp current assets vs equity to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.
Annual Net Asset Quality Index for Blockchaink2 Corp (1997–2025)
The table below presents the year-by-year Net Asset Quality Index for Blockchaink2 Corp from 1997 to 2025, covering 29 annual filings. Each row shows total assets, total liabilities, net assets, the quality index percentage, and the change in percentage points compared to the prior year. For market capitalisation and the full company profile, see BITK market cap.
| Year | Quality Index | Net Assets (CAD) | Total Assets | Total Liabilities | Change (pp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -544.5% | CA$-1.89 Million | CA$346.90K | CA$2.24 Million | ▼ -386.9 pp |
| 2024 | -157.6% | CA$-781.87K | CA$496.11K | CA$1.28 Million | ▼ -183.2 pp |
| 2023 | 25.6% | CA$297.78K | CA$1.16 Million | CA$863.97K | ▼ -2.8 pp |
| 2022 | 28.4% | CA$384.79K | CA$1.35 Million | CA$968.85K | ▼ -52.2 pp |
| 2021 | 80.6% | CA$1.51 Million | CA$1.87 Million | CA$362.25K | ▼ -15.5 pp |
| 2020 | 96.1% | CA$2.69 Million | CA$2.79 Million | CA$107.95K | ▼ -2.0 pp |
| 2019 | 98.2% | CA$2.90 Million | CA$2.95 Million | CA$53.94K | ▲ +7.6 pp |
| 2018 | 90.6% | CA$3.55 Million | CA$3.92 Million | CA$368.14K | ▲ +1.3 pp |
| 2017 | 89.3% | CA$949.37K | CA$1.06 Million | CA$113.38K | ▲ +55.2 pp |
| 2016 | 34.1% | CA$70.50K | CA$206.50K | CA$136.01K | ▼ -50.9 pp |
| 2015 | 85.1% | CA$416.34K | CA$489.49K | CA$73.16K | ▲ +6.7 pp |
| 2014 | 78.3% | CA$866.92K | CA$1.11 Million | CA$240.09K | ▼ -14.3 pp |
| 2013 | 92.6% | CA$13.50 Million | CA$14.57 Million | CA$1.08 Million | ▼ -5.7 pp |
| 2012 | 98.3% | CA$14.38 Million | CA$14.63 Million | CA$252.86K | ▲ +16.5 pp |
| 2011 | 81.8% | CA$843.72K | CA$1.03 Million | CA$188.25K | ▼ -0.1 pp |
| 2010 | 81.9% | CA$1.84 Million | CA$2.25 Million | CA$407.00K | ▼ -16.1 pp |
| 2009 | 98.0% | CA$2.04 Million | CA$2.08 Million | CA$41.12K | ▲ +26.8 pp |
| 2008 | 71.2% | CA$2.95 Million | CA$4.15 Million | CA$1.19 Million | ▼ -11.6 pp |
| 2007 | 82.8% | CA$2.41 Million | CA$2.91 Million | CA$500.09K | ▼ -6.1 pp |
| 2006 | 88.9% | CA$1.68 Million | CA$1.88 Million | CA$209.09K | ▼ -9.2 pp |
| 2005 | 98.1% | CA$3.27 Million | CA$3.33 Million | CA$62.15K | ▲ +33.0 pp |
| 2004 | 65.1% | CA$2.59 Million | CA$3.98 Million | CA$1.39 Million | ▼ -31.4 pp |
| 2003 | 96.5% | CA$2.90 Million | CA$3.01 Million | CA$106.47K | ▲ +153.7 pp |
| 2002 | -57.3% | CA$-205.38K | CA$358.60K | CA$563.98K | ▼ -114.0 pp |
| 2001 | 56.7% | CA$399.32K | CA$704.50K | CA$305.18K | ▲ +52.8 pp |
| 2000 | 3.9% | CA$19.13K | CA$492.79K | CA$473.66K | ▼ -95.4 pp |
| 1999 | 99.2% | CA$3.07 Million | CA$3.09 Million | CA$23.53K | ▲ +3300.8 pp |
| 1998 | -3201.6% | CA$-562.74K | CA$17.58K | CA$580.32K | ▼ -926.6 pp |
| 1997 | -2275.0% | CA$-489.37K | CA$21.51K | CA$510.88K | — |